Targeting Aurora Kinases with Danusertib (PHA-739358) Inhibits Growth of Liver Metastases from Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in an Orthotopic Xenograft Model

Labor Lademannbogen, Hamburg, Germany.
Clinical Cancer Research (Impact Factor: 8.19). 07/2012; 18(17):4621-32. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2968
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Aurora kinases play a crucial role in cell-cycle control. Uncontrolled expression of aurora kinases causes aneuploidy and tumor growth. As conservative treatment options for advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) are disappointing, aurora kinases may be an interesting target for novel therapeutic strategies.
Human GEP-NETs were tested for aurora kinase expression. The efficacy of the new aurora kinase inhibitor danusertib was evaluated in two human GEP-NET cell lines (BON1 and QGP) in vitro and in vivo.
The majority of ten insulinomas and all 33 nonfunctional pancreatic or midgut GEP-NETs expressed aurora A despite a mostly high degree of cell differentiation. Both human GEP-NET cell lines expressed aurora kinase A and B, and high Ser10 phosphorylation of histone H3 revealed increased aurora B activity. Remarkably, danusertib led to cell-cycle arrest and completely inhibited cell proliferation of the GEP-NET cells in vitro. Decreased phosphorylation of histone H3 indicated effective aurora B inhibition. In a subcutaneous murine xenograft model, danusertib significantly reduced tumor growth in vivo compared with controls or mice treated with streptozotocine/5-fluorouracil. As a consequence, decreased levels of tumor marker chromogranin A were found in mouse serum samples. In a newly developed orthotopic model for GEP-NET liver metastases by intrasplenic tumor cell transplantation, dynamic MRI proved significant growth inhibition of BON1- and QGP-derived liver metastases.
These results show that danusertib may impose a new therapeutic strategy for aurora kinase expressing metastasized GEP-NETs.


Available from: Harald Ittrich, Jun 03, 2015
1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Over the last few years, there have been important advances in the understanding of the molecular biology of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) that have already translated into relevant advances in the clinic. Several studies have extensively assessed the mutational profile of NETs, and have shown the key roles that angiogenesis and the PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway play in the pathogenesis of these tumors. Recent data has also revealed the potential relevance of transcription factors such as death domain-associated protein, x-linked mental retardation, and α-thalassemia syndrome protein or ataxia telangiectasia-mutated in NETs of pancreatic origin. This fast progress is leading to a rapidly increasing number of new agents being explored in the field of NETs. However, and despite some unquestionable success, objective remission rates remain low, and evidence of a substantial survival impact is lacking. Thus, there is an important need to improve our ability to identify patients most likely to benefit from specific therapies, and to incorporate biomarkers in the management of NETs. In addition, further efforts to understand mechanisms of escape and acquired resistance to the different available agents is of utmost importance, and will likely require performing paired tumor biopsies (prior and after treatment) or sequential sampling of surrogate tissues. Combinations of approved agents with new agents, either in a rational or biomarker-driven manner, are certainly warranted in this field. Likewise, sequential strategies to modulate and compensate for escape phenomenons are also of great interest. It should also be noted, however, that targeted agents are not innocuous and frequently yield toxicities that need to be adequately addressed by experienced specialists, particularly when drug combinations are considered. This review summarizes the salient data on biomarker and new agent development for the treatment of NETs.
    CANCER AND METASTASIS REVIEW 12/2013; 33(1). DOI:10.1007/s10555-013-9467-z · 6.45 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Introduction: Aurora kinase A, B and C, members of serine/threonine kinase family, are key regulators of mitosis. As Aurora kinases are overexpressed in many of the human cancers, small-molecule inhibitors of Aurora kinase have emerged as a possible treatment option for cancer. Areas covered: In 2009 and 2011, the literature pertaining to Aurora kinase inhibitors and their patents was reviewed. Here, the aim is to update the information for Aurora kinase inhibitors in clinical trials and the patents filed between the years 2011 and 2013. Pubmed, Scopus®, Scifinder®, USPTO, EPO and databases were used for searching the literature and patents for Aurora kinase inhibitors. Expert opinion: Even though both Aurora sub-type selective as well as pan-selective inhibitors show preclinical and clinical efficacy, so far no Aurora kinase inhibitor has been approved for clinical use. Particularly, dose-limiting toxicity (neutropenia) is a key issue that needs to be addressed. Preliminary evidence suggests that the use of selective Aurora A inhibitors could avoid Aurora B-mediated neutropenia in clinical settings. Also, use of adjunctive agents such as granulocyte stimulating factor to overcome neutropenia associated with Aurora B inhibition could be an answer to overcome the toxicity and bring Aurora inhibitors to market in the future.
    Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Patents 06/2014; DOI:10.1517/13543776.2014.931374 · 3.44 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose BI 831266 is a potent, selective, low-molecular-weight inhibitor of Aurora kinase B. This trial aimed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BI 831266 in patients with advanced solid tumors (NCT00756223; EudraCT 2008-001631-36; 1257.1). Methods BI 831266 (4-130 mg) was administered over 24 h on days 1 and 15 of a 4-week schedule. A modified 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was utilized to evaluate the MTD. Safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and exploratory biomarkers were secondary endpoints. Results Twenty-five patients received BI 831266. The most frequent tumor type was colorectal cancer (48 %). One patient (130 mg) experienced a dose-limiting toxicity of grade 3 febrile neutropenia. The trial was prematurely terminated (sponsor decision) without further dose-escalation. The most frequent treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were fatigue (20 %), neutropenia, alopecia (16 % each), anemia, dry skin, and nausea (12 % each). Treatment-related grade ≥3 AEs were neutropenia (12 %), anemia (8 %), and febrile neutropenia (4 %); 15 patients experienced serious AEs. High variability in the pharmacokinetic profiles precluded definitive pharmacokinetic conclusions. Exploratory biomarker determination revealed consistency with the mode of action as an Aurora kinase B inhibitor. One patient (4 %; 32 mg) with cervical cancer demonstrated a confirmed partial response (duration 141 days, PFS 414 days). Four patients had stable disease. Conclusion The MTD of BI 831266 was not reached because of early trial termination. BI 831266 demonstrated a generally manageable safety profile and signs of antitumor activity in some patients' solid tumors.
    Investigational New Drugs 12/2014; DOI:10.1007/s10637-014-0201-7 · 2.93 Impact Factor