Article

Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting oncologic outcome after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
European Urology (Impact Factor: 10.48). 06/2012; 62(3):382-404. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.05.047
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Despite the large diffusion of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), literature and data on the oncologic outcome of RARP are limited.
Evaluate lymph node yield, positive surgical margins (PSMs), use of adjuvant therapy, and biochemical recurrence (BCR)-free survival following RARP and perform a cumulative analysis of all studies comparing the oncologic outcomes of RARP and retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP) or laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (LRP).
A systematic review of the literature was performed in August 2011, searching Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases. A free-text protocol using the term radical prostatectomy was applied. The following limits were used: humans; gender (male); and publications dating from January 1, 2008. A cumulative analysis was conducted using Review Manager software v.4.2 (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) and Stata 11.0 SE software (StataCorp, College Station, TX, USA).
We retrieved 79 papers evaluating oncologic outcomes following RARP. The mean PSM rate was 15% in all comers and 9% in pathologically localized cancers, with some tumor characteristics being the most relevant predictors of PSMs. Several surgeon-related characteristics or procedure-related issues may play a major role in PSM rates. With regard to BCR, the very few papers with a follow-up duration >5 yr demonstrated 7-yr BCR-free survival estimates of approximately 80%. Finally, all the cumulative analyses comparing RARP with RRP and comparing RARP with LRP demonstrated similar overall PSM rates (RARP vs RRP: odds ratio [OR]: 1.21; p=0.19; RARP vs LRP: OR: 1.12; p=0.47), pT2 PSM rates (RARP vs RRP: OR: 1.25; p=0.31; RARP vs LRP: OR: 0.99; p=0.97), and BCR-free survival estimates (RARP vs RRP: hazard ratio [HR]: 0.9; p=0.526; RARP vs LRP: HR: 0.5; p=0.141), regardless of the surgical approach.
PSM rates are similar following RARP, RRP, and LRP. The few data available on BCR from high-volume centers are promising, but definitive comparisons with RRP or LRP are not currently possible. Finally, significant data on cancer-specific mortality are not currently available.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
90 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive radical prostatectomy (RP) (robotic and laparoscopic), have brought improvements in the outcomes of RP due to improved views and increased degrees of freedom of surgical devices. Robotic and laparoscopic surgeries do not incorporate haptic feedback, which may result in complications secondary to inadequate tissue dissection (causing positive surgical margins, rhabdosphincter damage, etc). We developed a micro-engineered device (6 mm2 sized) [E-finger]) capable of quantitative elasticity assessment, with amplitude ratio, mean ratio and phase lag representing this. The aim was to assess the utility of the device in differentiating peri-prostatic tissue types in order to guide prostate dissection. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two embalmed and 2 fresh frozen cadavers were used in the study. Baseline elasticity values were assessed in bladder, prostate and rhabdosphincter of pre-dissected embalmed cadavers using the micro-engineered device. A measurement grid was created to span from the bladder, across the prostate and onto the rhabdosphincter of fresh frozen cadavers to enable a systematic quantitative elasticity assessment of the entire area by 2 independent assessors. Tissue was sectioned along each row of elasticity measurement points, and stained with haematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Image analysis was performed with Image Pro Premier to determine the histology at each measurement point. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in elasticity were identified between bladder, prostate and sphincter in both embalmed and fresh frozen cadavers (p = <0.001). Intra-class correlation (ICC) reliability tests showed good reliability (average ICC = 0.851). Sensitivity and specificity for tissue identification was 77% and 70% respectively to a resolution of 6 mm2. CONCLUSIONS: This cadaveric study has evaluated the ability of our elasticity assessment device to differentiate bladder, prostate and rhabdosphincter to a resolution of 6 mm2. The results provide useful data for which to continue to examine the use of elasticity assessment devices for tissue quality assessment with the aim of giving haptic feedback to surgeons performing complex surgery.
    PLoS ONE 11/2014; · 3.53 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose We determined whether the pattern of low detectable prostate specific antigen during the first 3 years of followup after radical prostatectomy would predict subsequent biochemical recurrence. Materials and Methods An institutional database was queried to identify 1,136 patients who underwent open retropubic or robot-assisted radical prostatectomy between January 5, 1993 and December 29, 2008. After applying exclusion criteria we used serum prostate specific antigen and the prostate specific antigen pattern during the first 3 years of followup to divide 566 men into 3 groups, including 1) undetectable prostate specific antigen (0.03 ng/ml or less), 2) low detectable-stable prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.03 and less than 0.2 ng/ml, no 2 subsequent increases and/or prostate specific antigen velocity less than 0.05 ng per year) and 3) low detectable-unstable prostate specific antigen (greater than 0.03 and less than 0.2 ng/ml, 2 subsequent increases according to NCCN criteria and/or prostate specific antigen velocity 0.05 ng per year or greater). The primary end point was biochemical recurrence, defined as prostate specific antigen 0.2 ng/ml or greater, or receipt of radiation therapy beyond 3 years of followup. Results Seven-year biochemical recurrence-free survival was 95%, 94% and 37% in the undetectable, low detectable-stable and low detectable-unstable groups, respectively (log rank test p <0.0001). On multivariate analysis the prostate specific antigen pattern during 3 years postoperatively (undetectable vs low detectable-unstable HR 15.9 and vs low detectable-stable HR 1.6), pathological T stage (pT2 vs greater than pT2 HR 1.8), pathological Gleason score (less than 7 vs 7 HR 2.3 and less than 7 vs 8–10 HR 3.3) and surgical margins (negative vs positive HR 1.8) significantly predicted biochemical recurrence. Conclusions The combination of prostate specific antigen velocity and NCCN criteria for biochemical recurrence separated well men with low detectable prostate specific antigen after radical prostatectomy into those who required treatment and those who could be safely watched.
    The Journal of Urology 11/2014; 192(5):1390–1396. · 3.75 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Robotic surgery has been advocated for the radical excision of rectal cancer. Most data supporting its use have been reported from European and Asian centers, with a paucity of data from the United States documenting clear advantages of the robotic technique. This study compares the short-term outcome of robotic versus laparoscopic surgery.
    JSLS: Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons / Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 07/2014; 18(3). · 0.79 Impact Factor

Full-text

Download
7 Downloads
Available from
Nov 18, 2014