Correlations of clinical and laboratory measures of balance in older men and women: The MOBILIZE boston study.

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA.
Arthritis Care and Research (Impact Factor: 4.71). 12/2012; 64(12). DOI: 10.1002/acr.21783
Source: PubMed


It is known that impaired balance is associated with falls in older adults; however, there is no accepted gold standard on how balance should be measured. Few studies have examined measures of postural sway and clinical balance concurrently in large samples of community-dwelling older adults. We examined the associations among 4 types of measures of laboratory- and clinic-based balance in a large population-based cohort of older adults.

We evaluated balance measures in the Maintenance of Balance, Independent Living, Intellect and Zest in the Elderly Boston Study (276 men and 489 women ages 64-97 years). The measures included laboratory-based anteroposterior (AP) path length and mean sway speed, mediolateral (ML) mean sway and root mean square, and area of ellipse postural sway; the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB); the Berg Balance Scale; and the one-leg stand test. Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were assessed among the balance measures.

The area of ellipse sway was highly correlated with the ML sway measures (r = >0.91, P < 0.0001) and sway speed was highly correlated with AP sway (r = 0.97, P < 0.0001). The Berg Balance Scale was highly correlated with the SPPB (r = 0.74, P < 0.001) and the one-leg stand test (r = 0.82, P < 0.001). Correlations between the laboratory- and clinic-based balance measures were low but statistically significant (-0.29 ≤ r ≤ -0.16, P < 0.0001).

Clinic-based balance measures, and laboratory-based measures comparing area of ellipse with ML sways or sway speed with AP sway, are highly correlated. There is less correlation between the clinic- and laboratory-based measures. Since both laboratory- and clinic-based measures inform balance in older adults, but are not highly correlated with each other, future work should investigate the differences.

Download full-text


Available from: Wenjun Li, Sep 30, 2015
42 Reads
  • Source
    • "It must be remembered that, any cognitive, proprioceptive (sensory), muscular strength or motor coordination impairment could result in postural control deficits, and clinical balance assessment tools (such as time, distance performance or COP parameters) can provide some information on a variety of dimensions of postural control deficits (Hughes et al., 1996; Mancini & Horak, 2010; Pollock et al., 2000). This is further supported by a recent study (Nguyen et al., 2012) that suggest clinical functional tests such as 6MWT and laboratory-based measures from COP parameters may capture different aspects of balance and likely complement each other. "
    Motriz. Revista de Educação Física 09/2015; 21(3):250-255. · 0.09 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Functional tests can measure balance deficit indirectly through the recorded time-limit of physical performance (i.e., one aspect of physical condition or muscular capacity of individual), while COP parameters from a force platform can directly analyze balance deficits related to proprioception and postural adjustments (feedback and feedfoward) of the neuromuscular system (Winter, 1995; Lacour et al., 1997; Lafond et al., 2004; Hughes et al., 1996; Holbein-Jenny et al., 2007; Pollock et al., 2000). This is further supported by a recent study (Nguyen et al., 2012) suggesting that clinical functional tests such as time-limit to stand one leg and laboratory-based measures from COP parameters may capture different aspects of balance and likely complement each other. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Poor posture control has been associated with an increased risk of falls and mobility disability among older adults. This study was conducted to assess the test-retest reliability and sensitivity to group differences regarding the time-limit (T(Limit)) of one-leg standing and selected balance parameters obtained with a force platform in older and young adults. A secondary purpose was to assess the relationship between T(Limit) and these balance parameters. Twenty-eight healthy older adults (age: 69±5years) and thirty young adults (age: 21±4years) participated in this study. Two one-leg stance tasks were performed: (1) three trials of 30s maximum and (2) one T(Limit) trial. The following balance parameters were computed: center of pressure area, RMS sway amplitude, and mean velocity and mean frequency in both the anterio-posterior and medio-lateral directions. All balance parameters obtained with the force platform as well as the T(Limit) variable were sensitive to differences in balance performance between older and young adults. The test-retest reliability of these measures was found to be acceptable (ICC: 0.40-0.85), with better ICC scores observed for mean velocity and mean frequency in the older group. Pearson correlations coefficients (r) between balance parameters and T(Limit) ranged from -0.16 to -0.54. These results add to the current literature that can be used in the development of measurement tools for evaluating balance in older and young adults.
    Journal of electromyography and kinesiology: official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology 02/2013; 23(3). DOI:10.1016/j.jelekin.2013.01.008 · 1.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Falls leading to osteoporotic fracture is a substantial issue clinically. By inference from the literature, women with osteoporosis who are classified as having a history of falls may not represent a distinct homogeneous population. However, studies exploring the potential heterogeneity within fallers in women with osteoporosis are scarce. The objective of this study was to better understand the physical function characteristics of women with osteoporosis, with and without a previous history of falls, by further stratifying them based on their single-leg stance (SLS) performance. Eighty-seven consecutive, community-dwelling women with osteoporosis were recruited from the Endocrinology Clinic at Singapore General Hospital. Laboratory-based and clinic-based standing balance tests, a lower limb strength test, and the 6-min walk test (6MWT) were measured. Fallers and non-fallers did not differ in standing balance, lower limb strength nor the 6MWT (P's>0.08). SLS performance was an independent predictor of the various functional measures, after adjusting for age and body mass index. Specifically, an increase in SLS time was associated with lower standing center-of-pressure velocities, greater lower limb strength, and greater 6-min walking distance. When the two groups were stratified based on their recent history of falls and clinic-based standing balance performance (SLS time), fallers with good SLS time (>30s) showed better functional outcomes than did non-fallers with poor SLS time (≤30s) (P's<0.08) and comparable functional outcomes with non-fallers with good SLS time (P's>0.11). The results indicate an important heterogeneity within fallers and non-fallers with osteoporosis and they argue for a individualized approach to rehabilitation.
    Gait & posture 12/2013; 39(3). DOI:10.1016/j.gaitpost.2013.12.009 · 2.75 Impact Factor
Show more