Article

2012 Update: World Allergy Organization Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis

Department of Pediatrics & Child Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Current Opinion in Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Impact Factor: 3.66). 06/2012; 12(4):389-99. DOI: 10.1097/ACI.0b013e328355b7e4
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT The World Allergy Organization (WAO) Guidelines for the assessment and management of anaphylaxis published in early 2011 provide a global perspective on patient risk factors, triggers, clinical diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of anaphylaxis. In this 2012 Update, subsequently published, clinically relevant research in these areas is reviewed.
Patient risk factors and co-factors that amplify anaphylaxis have been documented in prospective studies. The global perspective on the triggers of anaphylaxis has expanded. The clinical criteria for the diagnosis of anaphylaxis that are promulgated in the Guidelines have been validated. Some aspects of anaphylaxis treatment have been prospectively studied. Novel investigations of self-injectable epinephrine for treatment of anaphylaxis recurrences in the community have been performed. Progress has been made with regard to measurement of specific IgE to allergen components (component-resolved testing) that might help to distinguish clinical risk of future anaphylactic episodes to an allergen from asymptomatic sensitization to the allergen. New strategies for immune modulation to prevent food-induced anaphylaxis and new insights into subcutaneous immunotherapy to prevent venom-induced anaphylaxis have been described.
Research highlighted in this Update strengthens the evidence-based recommendations for assessment, management, and prevention of anaphylaxis made in the WAO Anaphylaxis Guidelines.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Motohiro Ebisawa, Jan 23, 2015
6 Followers
 · 
804 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: There are ongoing concerns about the quality of care provision for allergy in primary care. AIMS: To identify current training provision in allergy to GP trainees and to understand how this could be enhanced. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey of GP Speciality Training (GPST) programme directors was undertaken. Programme directors of the 174 GPST schemes were sent an online questionnaire which was informed by the content of the Royal College of General Practitioners curriculum. Quantitative data were descriptively analysed and a thematic analysis was undertaken of free text responses. RESULTS: We obtained responses from 146 directors representing 106 training programmes. Responses indicated that two-thirds (62%, 95% CI 53.1 to 71.5) of programmes were providing at least some allergy training, with the remaining third stating that they either provided no training or were unsure. Overall, one-third (33%, 95% CI 22.7 to 42.2) of programme directors believed that all the relevant allergy-related curriculum requirements were being met. Where provided, this training was believed to be best for organ-specific allergic disorders but was thought to be poorer for systemic allergic disorders, particularly food allergy where 67% (95% CI 57.5 to 76.5) of respondents indicated that training was poor. There was considerable interest in increasing the allergy training provided, preferably through eLearning modules and problem-based learning materials supported by those with relevant specialist knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: This UK-wide survey has identified important gaps in the training of GP trainees in relation to allergy care. Addressing these gaps, particularly in the management of systemic allergic disorders, should help to improve delivery of primary care-based allergy care.
    Primary care respiratory journal: journal of the General Practice Airways Group 10/2012; 22(1). DOI:10.4104/pcrj.2012.00087
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Anaphylaxis is in most cases an IgE-dependent immunologic reaction. Mast cells are activated and release several mediators. Recent data about possible triggers of anaphylaxis indicate a clear age-dependency. The most frequent triggers of anaphylaxis in children are foods; in adults venom and drugs predominate. In 2006 an anaphylaxis registry was established in German-speaking countries. In the registry the triggers, circumstances, and treatment measures are collected from patients with anaphylaxis. However, the registry cannot supply epidemiological data like prevalence or incidence rates since the registration of cases is based on collaboration with allergy centers only. Similarly, other approaches to obtain data on the epidemiology of anaphylaxis are problematic given that allergic reactions of varying severity are covered by a number of codes in the ICD-10. Research in the field of anaphylaxis is focused on the identification of risk factors. Several data indicate the relevance of co-factors and augmentation factors in well-defined patient groups. Among these factors physical activity, infection, alcohol and additives are relevant. In the future a unique coding system with a subtype analysis regarding the triggers and severity should help to provide data on the epidemiology of anaphylaxis. Furthermore the mechanisms of co-factors and identification of biomarkers for risk assessment are important research areas for the future.
    Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft 11/2012; 11(1). DOI:10.1111/j.1610-0387.2012.08045.x · 1.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
Show more