Unilateral Prefrontal Direct Current Stimulation Effects are Modulated by Working Memory Load and Gender

The Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel.
Brain Stimulation (Impact Factor: 4.4). 06/2012; 6(3). DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2012.05.014
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: Recent studies revealed that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) may improve verbal working memory (WM) performance in humans. In the present study, we evaluated executive attention, which is the core of WM capacity, considered to be significantly involved in tasks that require active maintenance of memory representations in interference-rich conditions, and is highly dependent on DLPFC function. OBJECTIVES: We investigated verbal WM accuracy using a WM task that is highly sensitive to executive attention function. We were interested in how verbal WM accuracy may be affected by WM load, unilateral DLPFC stimulation, and gender, as previous studies showed gender-dependent brain activation during verbal WM tasks. METHODS: We utilized a modified verbal n-Back task hypothesized to increase demands on executive attention. We examined "online" WM performance while participants received transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), and implicit learning performance in a post-stimulation WM task. RESULTS: Significant lateralized "online" stimulation effects were found only in the highest WM load condition revealing that males benefit from left DLPFC stimulation, while females benefit from right DLPFC stimulation. High WM load performance in the left DLPFC stimulation was significantly related to post-stimulation recall performance. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the idea that lateralized stimulation effects in high verbal WM load may be gender-dependent. Further, our post-stimulation results support the idea that increased left hemisphere activity may be important for encoding verbal information into episodic memory as well as for facilitating retrieval of context-specific targets from semantic memory.

Download full-text


Available from: Oded Meiron, Feb 10, 2015
1 Follower
22 Reads
  • Source
    • "The results also show that the effects of tDCS are highly variable and may be dependent upon the task and stimulation parameters, as illustrated in studies probing working memory function. For instance, working memory was shown to be enhanced by cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC [29], anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC [21,41e49]; and anodal tDCS over the right DLPFC [48]. Working memory performance was also shown to be decreased by cathodal tDCS over the left DLPFC [21], anodal tDCS over the left DLPFC [36]; and tDCS over bilateral DLPFC (left anodal/ right cathodal: [62]). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is increasingly used in research and clinical settings, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is often chosen as a target for stimulation. While numerous studies report modulation of cognitive abilities following DLPFC stimulation, the wide array of cognitive functions that can be modulated makes it difficult to predict its precise outcome. Objective The present review aims at identifying and characterizing the various cognitive domains affected by tDCS over DLPFC. Methods Articles using tDCS over DLPFC indexed in PubMed and published between 2000 and January 2014 were included in the present review. Results tDCS over DLPFC affects a wide array of cognitive functions, with sometimes apparent conflicting results. Conclusion Prefrontal tDCS has the potential to modulate numerous cognitive functions simultaneously, but to properly interpret the results, a clear a priori hypothesis is necessary, careful technical consideration are mandatory, further insights into the neurobiological impact of tDCS are needed, and consideration should be given to the possibility that some behavioral effects may be partly explained by parallel modulation of related functions.
    Brain Stimulation 10/2014; 7(6). DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2014.10.003 · 4.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "The speed measure also showed benefits of a left ventral PFC anode (F9), insofar as that group performed better than the other groups, except for C4. We speculate that the working memory load associated with retaining and updating memory of “foe” mines from game to game may have benefited from stimulation of left PFC, previously found to benefit working memory (e.g., Hoy et al., 2013; Meiron and Lavidor, 2013). However, both left and right PFC stimulation at F3 and F4 have been found to have other effects, e.g., more cautious driving in a simulator (Beeli et al., 2008) and reduced risk taking (Fecteau et al., 2007). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a need to facilitate acquisition of real world cognitive multi-tasks that require long periods of training (e.g., air traffic control, intelligence analysis, medicine). Non-invasive brain stimulation-specifically transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)-has promise as a method to speed multi-task training. We hypothesized that during acquisition of the complex multi-task Space Fortress, subtasks that require focused attention on ship control would benefit from tDCS aimed at the dorsal attention network while subtasks that require redirection of attention would benefit from tDCS aimed at the right hemisphere ventral attention network. We compared effects of 30 min prefrontal and parietal stimulation to right and left hemispheres on subtask performance during the first 45 min of training. The strongest effects both overall and for ship flying (control and velocity subtasks) were seen with a right parietal (C4, reference to left shoulder) montage, shown by modeling to induce an electric field that includes nodes in both dorsal and ventral attention networks. This is consistent with the re-orienting hypothesis that the ventral attention network is activated along with the dorsal attention network if a new, task-relevant event occurs while visuospatial attention is focused (Corbetta et al., 2008). No effects were seen with anodes over sites that stimulated only dorsal (C3) or only ventral (F10) attention networks. The speed subtask (update memory for symbols) benefited from an F9 anode over left prefrontal cortex. These results argue for development of tDCS as a training aid in real world settings where multi-tasking is critical.
    Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 09/2014; 8:665. DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00665 · 2.99 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • ", 2012 ; Meiron and Lavidor , 2013 ) . One study found a gender - dependent improvement in accuracy , with male subjects profiting more from left DLPFC stimulation and female subjects profiting more from right DLPFC stimulation , but only if distractor loads were high ( Meiron and Lavidor , 2013 ) . The other study used a modified Sternberg task , which introduced additional distractor stimuli dur - ing the delay period ( Gladwin et al . "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Learning and memory functions are crucial in the interaction of an individual with the environment and involve the interplay of large, distributed brain networks. Recent advances in technologies to explore neurobiological correlates of neuropsychological paradigms have increased our knowledge about human learning and memory. In this chapter we first review and define memory and learning processes from a neuropsychological perspective. Then we provide some illustrations of how noninvasive brain stimulation can play a major role in the investigation of memory functions, as it can be used to identify cause-effect relationships and chronometric properties of neural processes underlying cognitive steps. In clinical medicine, transcranial magnetic stimulation may be used as a diagnostic tool to understand memory and learning deficits in various patient populations. Furthermore, noninvasive brain stimulation is also being applied to enhance cognitive functions, offering exciting translational therapeutic opportunities in neurology and psychiatry.
    Handbook of Clinical Neurology 10/2013; 116C:693-737. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00055-3
Show more