Report of the American Psychiatric Association Task Force on Treatment of Gender Identity Disorder

Department of Psychiatry, JJ Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA.
Archives of Sexual Behavior (Impact Factor: 3.53). 06/2012; 41(4):759-96. DOI: 10.1007/s10508-012-9975-x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Both the diagnosis and treatment of Gender Identity Disorder (GID) are controversial. Although linked, they are separate issues and the DSM does not evaluate treatments. The Board of Trustees (BOT) of the American Psychiatric Association (APA), therefore, formed a Task Force charged to perform a critical review of the literature on the treatment of GID at different ages, to assess the quality of evidence pertaining to treatment, and to prepare a report that included an opinion as to whether or not sufficient credible literature exists for development of treatment recommendations by the APA. The literature on treatment of gender dysphoria in individuals with disorders of sex development was also assessed. The completed report was accepted by the BOT on September 11, 2011. The quality of evidence pertaining to most aspects of treatment in all subgroups was determined to be low; however, areas of broad clinical consensus were identified and were deemed sufficient to support recommendations for treatment in all subgroups. With subjective improvement as the primary outcome measure, current evidence was judged sufficient to support recommendations for adults in the form of an evidence-based APA Practice Guideline with gaps in the empirical data supplemented by clinical consensus. The report recommends that the APA take steps beyond drafting treatment recommendations. These include issuing position statements to clarify the APA's position regarding the medical necessity of treatments for GID, the ethical bounds of treatments of gender variant minors, and the rights of persons of any age who are gender variant, transgender or transsexual.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is currently no consensus over how best to approach work with gender-nonconforming children and their families. We turn to attachment theory to develop a framework for assessing the impact of two different approaches, suggesting that new understandings of links between shame, shame proneness, depression, and identity might provide key questions to consider in developing services for these children. We outline arguments from both sides of the debate, highlighting the work of 2 leading clinicians. We suggest that supportive approaches are more consistent with an attachment-based framework while approaches aimed at correcting gender-nonconforming behavior risk increasing attachment dysfunction.
    International Journal of Transgenderism 07/2013; 14(3):113-126. DOI:10.1080/15532739.2013.824845
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Health care for individuals whose gender experience differs from the sex assigned to them at birth has so far taken place in the conflicted space between one's right to self-determination and the (mental) health professionals' fear of coming to wrong decisions. The "Standards of Care recommended by the German Society for Sex Research. The Academy for Sexual Medicine and the Society for Sexology" (Becker et al. 1997) were an attempt to regulate this field of controversy on the basis of scientific and clinical evidence within the German health care system. In the meantime, these standards are considered to be in need of revision, against the background of both the 7th version of the international Standards of Care of the World Professional Association of Transgender Health (WPATH 2011) and the most recent judgement of the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesver- fassungsgericht BVerfG). In the summer of 2011, the German Society of Sex Research (Deutsche Gesellschaft fiir Sexualforschung, DGfS) took the initiative to develop evidence-based guidelines in collaboration with related professional societies following methodologies proposed by the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF) in order to improve the quality of health care. The present article describes the background and procedures involved in the development of these clinical guidelines, and provides a view of future aspects of the process. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).
    Zeitschrift für Sexualforschung 03/2014; 27(1):59-76. DOI:10.1055/s-0034-1366127 · 0.33 Impact Factor
  • Source
    Gender Dysphoria and Disorders of Sex Development, Edited by Kreukels BPC, Steensma TD, de Vries ALC, 01/2013: chapter Gender Identity Diagnoses: History and Controversies: pages 137-150; Springer.


Available from
May 16, 2014