Article

Perceptions of organ donation after circulatory determination of death among critical care physicians and nurses: A national survey

Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Critical care medicine (Impact Factor: 6.15). 06/2012; 40(9):2595-600. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182590098
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT We sought to identify factors related to critical care physicians' and nurses' willingness to help manage potential donors after circulatory determination of death, and to elicit opinions on the presence of role conflict in donors after circulatory determination of death and its impact on end-of-life care.
Randomized trial administered by Web or post of four donors after circulatory determination of death vignettes. Response rates were 31.0% and 44.3%, respectively.
Two thousand two hundred and six academic inten-sive care unit physicians and 988 intensive care unit nurses in the United States.
Majorities of intensive care unit physicians (72.5%; 95% confidence interval 69.2-75.9) and nurses (74.3%; 95% confidence interval 70.2-78.5) believed they should help manage potential donors after circulatory determination of death. 14.7% (95% confidence interval 12.0-17.4) of physicians and 14.3% (95% confidence interval 11.0-17.6) of nurses believed that management of donors after circulatory determination of death would create professional role conflicts. 33.8% (95% confidence interval 30.0-37.4) of physicians and 55.1% (95% confidence interval 50.3-59.7) of nurses believed that preserving opportunities for donors after circulatory determination of death could improve end-of-life care. More favorable views of donors after circulatory determination of death were provided by clinicians randomly assigned to vignettes depicting donors with previously denoted preferences for organ donation; similar effects were not introduced by vignettes in which surrogates actively initiated donation discussions.
These findings suggest that critical care physicians and nurses are generally supportive of managing donors after circulatory determination of death, particularly when patients were registered organ donors. However, minorities of clinicians harbor concerns regarding conflicts of interest, and many are uncertain of the practice's impact on end-of-life care.

1 Follower
 · 
80 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The pediatric literature addressing extubation readiness parameters and strategies to wean from mechanical ventilation is limited in children. A survey was designed to assess the implementation of extubation readiness parameters among Pediatric Critical Care Physicians who are affiliated to academic centers in the United States. The overall response rate to the survey was 44.1% (417/945). The majority of responders check for an air leak, and check for the amount of tracheal secretions; and fewer physicians use sedation scores, perform a Rapid Shallow Breath Index (RSBI), and measure an airway occlusion pressure at 0.1 sec (P0.1 sec) prior to extubation. The majority perform a SBT with pressure support (PS). The majority consider 30 cm of H2O as the upper limit of an air leak test, and the need for endotracheal suctioning once every 2-4 hours as acceptable for extubation. In preparation for termination of mechanical ventilation the majority wean daily ventilator rates and or PS instead of daily SBT. Most PCCP report assessing extubation readiness by checking for air leak and suctioning needs, and less often consider or perform sedation scores or RSBI. Future studies on the best extubation parameters in children are needed.
    08/2013; DOI:10.4187/respcare.02469
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe parents' experience of organ donation decision making in the case of donation after circulatory determination of death. Qualitative exploratory analysis. Participants were recruited from the ICU of a single children's hospital located in the western United States. Thirteen parents, 11 families who consented to donate their child's organs. Interviews (average 82 min). Transcribed interviews were analyzed using the constant comparative method to identify themes that reflected similarities in parents' experiences. The themes we found included 1) factors contributing to parental decision making, 2) under the circumstances of the child dying, and 3) donation decision and its impact on parental grief. Factors that influenced the decision making all related to the child dying, including protecting the child's body and helping the child to die peacefully. Finally, parents made recommendations about the organ donation process, including empathy, attend to end-of-life concerns, and the provision of relevant information for donation decisions. Parents' decision making was related directly to end-of-life experience and grief process. Providers need to orient to parents' end-of-life concerns to support parents' decision-making process and improve donation after circulatory determination of death procedures.
    Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 12/2013; 15(2). DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000000035 · 2.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Hintergrund Eine Organtransplantation ist für viele Patienten mit terminalem Organversagen die einzige Therapieoption. Aufgrund des Mangels an transplantierbaren Organen versterben täglich Patienten, die zur Transplantation auf den Wartelisten gelistet sind. Die Zahl der Organspender in Deutschland sank im Jahr 2012 um 12,8 % und erreichte den niedrigsten Stand seit dem Jahr 2002. Dem ärztlichen und pflegerischen Fachpersonal auf den Intensivstationen kommt bei der Rekrutierung von potentiellen Organspendern eine Schlüsselrolle zu, daher wurde eine Befragung zu dieser Thematik durchgeführt. Material und Methoden Auf dem 12. Kongress der Deutschen Interdisziplinären Vereinigung für Intensiv- und Notfallmedizin (DIVI) wurde im Dezember 2012 mittels Paper-pencil-Befragung eine Punktprävalenzstudie durchgeführt. Ergebnisse Es wurden 1045 Fragebögen ausgewertet. Von den Befragten befürwortete 81 % die eigene Organspende im Falle ihres Hirntods. Die Zustimmungsrate in der ärztlichen Berufsgruppe betrug 84 % und in der pflegerischen Berufsgruppe 75 %. Einen Organspendeausweis besaßen 45,3 % der Teilnehmer (Ärzte 47 %, Pflegekräfte 44 %), annähernd die Hälfte (45 %) hatte ihre Einstellung zur Organspende bereits der Familie oder Freunden mitgeteilt. Als Hauptgründe gegen eine Organspende wurden die fehlende Akzeptanz des Hirntodkonzepts (40 %), Angst vor Missbrauch durch Organhandel (29 %) sowie die fehlende Unversehrtheit des eigenen Körpers nach dem Tod (11 %) genannt. Die im Jahr 2012 besonders intensiv geführte Diskussion über Organspende und Transplantationsmedizin hat bei 45 % der Befragten zu einer vorwiegend negativen Veränderung der Haltung geführt. Schlussfolgerung Die überwiegende Mehrzahl des intensivmedizinischen Fachpersonals befürwortet die Organspende, allerdings besitzen weniger als die Hälfte der Befragten einen Organspendeausweis. Die Berichte über Unregelmäßigkeiten bei der Organvergabe wurden kritisch hinterfragt, hatten aber anscheinend bisher keinen wesentlichen Einfluss auf die individuelle und grundsätzliche Spenderentscheidung im befragten Kollektiv.
    02/2013; DOI:10.1007/s00063-013-0271-x