Double innervation in free-flap surgery for long-standing facial paralysis

Department of Maxillo-Facial Surgery, San Paolo Hospital, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery (Impact Factor: 1.47). 06/2012; 65(10):1343-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2012.04.030
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT One-stage free-flap facial reanimation may be accomplished by using a gracilis transfer innervated by the masseteric nerve, but this technique does not restore the patient's ability to smile spontaneously. By contrast, the transfer of the latissimus dorsi innervated by the contralateral facial nerve provides the correct nerve stimulus but is limited by variation in the quantity of contraction. The authors propose a new one-stage facial reanimation technique using dual innervation; a gracilis muscle flap is innervated by the masseteric nerve, and supplementary nerve input is provided by a cross-face sural nerve graft anastomosed to the contralateral facial nerve branch.
Between October 2009 and March 2010, four patients affected by long-standing unilateral facial paralysis received gracilis muscle transfers innervated by both the masseteric nerve and the contralateral facial nerve.
All patients recovered voluntary and spontaneous smiling abilities. The recovery time to voluntary flap contraction was 3.8 months, and spontaneous flap contraction was achieved within 7.2 months after surgery. According to Terzis and Noah's five-stage classification of reanimation outcomes, two patients had excellent outcomes and two had good outcomes.
In this preliminary study, the devised double-innervation technique allows to achieve a good grade of flap contraction as well as emotional smiling ability. A wider number of operated patients are needed to confirm those initial findings.

1 Follower
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: IMPORTANCE Free muscle transfer innervated by a cross-facial nerve graft represents the criterion standard for smile reconstruction in facial paralysis. If primary reconstruction fails, a second muscle transfer is usually needed. Herein, we investigated the possibility of avoiding a second free muscle transfer by in situ coaptation of the gracilis muscle to the masseteric nerve. OBSERVATIONS We report a series of 3 failed free muscle transfers for facial reanimation among 21 free flap transfers performed for facial reanimation between March 2008 and August 2013. To salvage the muscle, we performed coaptation of the neural pedicle from the cross-facial nerve graft to the masseteric nerve. This method allows for leaving the fixation sutures of the muscle at the oral commissure in place. All patients showed muscle contraction after 3 months and a smile with open mouth after 6 months. No significant difference in the range of commissure excursion was observed between the healthy and operated sides. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Recoaptation of the neural pedicle from the cross-facial nerve graft to the masseteric nerve, leaving the muscle transplant in place, is a suitable salvage procedure after unsuccessful reconstruction with a cross-facial nerve graft, avoiding a second free muscle transfer.
    07/2014; 16(5). DOI:10.1001/jamafacial.2014.163
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The masseteric nerve has many advantages including low morbidity, its proximity to the facial nerve, the strong motor impulse, its reliability, and the fast reinnervation that is achievable in most patients. Reinnervation of a neuromuscular transplant is the main indication for its use, but it has been used for the treatment of recent facial palsies with satisfactory results. We have retrospectively evaluated 60 patients who had facial animation procedures using the masseteric nerve during the last 10 years. The patients included those with recent, and established or congenital, unilateral and bilateral palsies. The masseteric nerve was used for coaptation of the facial nerve either alone or in association with crossfacial nerve grafting, or for the reinnervation of gracilis neuromuscular transplants. Reinnervation was successful in all cases, the mean (range) time being 4 (2-5) months for facial nerve coaptation and 4 (3-7) months for neuromuscular transplants. Cosmesis was evaluated (moderate, n=10, good, n=30, and excellent, n=20) as was functional outcome (no case of impairment of masticatory function, all patients able to smile, and achievement of a smile independent from biting). The masseteric nerve has many uses, including in both recent, and established or congenital, cases. In some conditions it is the first line of treatment. The combination of combined techniques gives excellent results in unilateral palsies and should therefore be considered a valid option.
    British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 01/2014; 52(3). DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2013.12.013 · 1.13 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose of review To review the growing literature on the use of the masseteric nerve in facial reanimation, from direct neurotization, to 'baby-sitter' techniques, to its use in powering neuromuscular free tissue transfer. We focus on the indications for the different uses based on the timing of the facial paralysis and other patient factors. Recent findings The use of the masseteric nerve in facial reanimation is gaining widespread acceptance for use in an expanding number of clinical scenarios. Surgeon's experience and preference as well as patient selection are very important factors in choosing the appropriate surgical use of this nerve. Summary Facial reanimation surgery is a difficult challenge for any reconstructive surgeon. The use of the masseteric nerve branch to reanimate the face is gaining popularity. Its versatility, anatomical location, relative ease of dissection, low morbidity, and high potential for motor neural input make it an excellent option for many different reanimating techniques. The appropriate nerve use should be based on the type of facial paralysis, its timing, and patient factors such as age, prognosis, and desires. Understanding the benefits and potential drawbacks of utilizing this nerve represents an essential piece of knowledge for the facial reanimation surgeon.
    Current Opinion in Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery 07/2014; 22(4). DOI:10.1097/MOO.0000000000000070 · 1.39 Impact Factor