Reconstruction of large posttraumatic skeletal defects of the forearm by vascularized free fibular graft

Microsurgery (Impact Factor: 1.62). 12/2003; 24(6):423 - 429. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20067
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Vascularized bone graft is most commonly applied for reconstruction of the lower extremity; indications for its use in the reconstruction of the upper extremity have expanded in recent years. Between 1993–2000, 12 patients with segmental bone defects following forearm trauma were managed with vascularized fibular grafts: 6 males and 6 females, aged 39 years on average (range, 16–65 years). The reconstructed site was the radius in 8 patients and the ulna in 4. The length of bone defect ranged from 6–13 cm. In 4 cases, the fibular graft was harvested and used as a vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap. To achieve fixation of the grafted fibula, plates were used in 10 cases, and screws and Kirschner wires in 2. In the latter 2 cases, an external skeletal fixator was applied to ensure immobilization of the extremity. The follow-up period ranged from 10–93 months. Eleven grafts were successful. The mean period to obtain radiographic bone union was 4.8 months (range, 2.5–8 months). Fibular grafts allow the use of a segment of diaphyseal bone which is structurally similar to the radius and ulna and of sufficient length to reconstruct most skeletal defects of the forearm. The vascularized fibular graft is indicated in patients with intractable nonunions where conventional bone grafting has failed or large bone defects, exceeding 6 cm, are observed in the radius or ulna. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 24:423–429, 2004.

1 Bookmark
  • The Journal of hand surgery 06/2013; · 1.33 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Im vorliegenden Artikel berichten wir über unsere Erfahrungen bei der Behandlung von Knochendefekten an der oberen Extremität mit vaskularisierten Knochentransplantaten. Unter Berücksichtigung der aktuellen Literatur und aus unserer eigenen klinischen Erfahrung stellt die freie, vaskularisierte Knochentransplantation bei ausgedehnten Knochendefekten der oberen Extremität mit Weichteilbeteiligung die bestmögliche Behandlungsoption dar. Alternative, technisch weniger aufwändige Methoden haben keine nachweisbaren Vorteile. Komplikationen treten häufiger auf und die Behandlungsdauer ist länger als bei einer optimal durchgeführten mikrochirurgischen Rekonstruktion. This article reports on our experience treating bone defects of the upper extremity with vascularized bone grafts. In consideration of the current literature and our own experience, free vascularized bone grafts provide the best possibility to treat extensive bone defects that involve soft tissue of the upper extremity. Alternative, less challenging methods show no explicit advantages. Complications occur more often and the duration of treatment is even longer compared to a microsurgical reconstruction performed by an experienced surgeon. SchlüsselwörterKnochen–Transplantation–Knochentransplantate–Operationstechnik–Behandlungsergebnis KeywordsBone–Transplantation–Grafting, bone–Surgical procedures, operative–Treatment outcome
    Obere Extremität 01/2011; 6(3):177-188.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to review the results of 5 diaphyseal non-unions reconstructed using vascularized fibular grafts. This study included six non-unions (3 males and 3 females; average age: 47 years; range: 21 to 57 years) reconstructed using vascularized fibular grafts between 2002 and 2007. Average duration of non-union was 59 (range: 12 to 156) months. Fixation was achieved with intramedullary nailing in 3 patients and plates in 3. One case was lost to follow-up at the third postoperative month. The remaining five patients were followed up for an average of 37 (range: 12 to 53) months. In four cases, union was achieved with a single operation at an average of 4.4 months. A secondary intervention for grafting was required for one patient for inadequate consolidation of the proximal bone-graft interface. Mean radiographic humeral length difference was 3.6 (range: 1 to 7) cm. Average elbow range of motion was 130 (range: 100 to 145), shoulder flexion 167.5 (range: 165 to 170), shoulder abduction 172.5 (range: 170 to 180), internal rotation 75 (range: 70 to 80), and external rotation 92.5 (range: 80 to 100) degrees. Mean DASH score was 10 (range: 5 to 19). According to the Tang system, 3 patients had excellent and 2 good clinical evaluations. Radiologic evaluation revealed four excellent and one fair result. No donor site morbidity was detected. Our results suggest that vascularized fibular grafting is an effective treatment option for the reconstruction of humeral diaphyseal non-unions.
    acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica 01/2012; 46(3):149-53. · 0.60 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 30, 2014