Article

Reconstruction of large posttraumatic skeletal defects of the forearm by vascularized free fibular graft

Microsurgery (Impact Factor: 1.62). 12/2003; 24(6):423 - 429. DOI: 10.1002/micr.20067
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Vascularized bone graft is most commonly applied for reconstruction of the lower extremity; indications for its use in the reconstruction of the upper extremity have expanded in recent years. Between 1993–2000, 12 patients with segmental bone defects following forearm trauma were managed with vascularized fibular grafts: 6 males and 6 females, aged 39 years on average (range, 16–65 years). The reconstructed site was the radius in 8 patients and the ulna in 4. The length of bone defect ranged from 6–13 cm. In 4 cases, the fibular graft was harvested and used as a vascularized fibula osteoseptocutaneous flap. To achieve fixation of the grafted fibula, plates were used in 10 cases, and screws and Kirschner wires in 2. In the latter 2 cases, an external skeletal fixator was applied to ensure immobilization of the extremity. The follow-up period ranged from 10–93 months. Eleven grafts were successful. The mean period to obtain radiographic bone union was 4.8 months (range, 2.5–8 months). Fibular grafts allow the use of a segment of diaphyseal bone which is structurally similar to the radius and ulna and of sufficient length to reconstruct most skeletal defects of the forearm. The vascularized fibular graft is indicated in patients with intractable nonunions where conventional bone grafting has failed or large bone defects, exceeding 6 cm, are observed in the radius or ulna. © 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 24:423–429, 2004.

1 Bookmark
 · 
91 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extensive destruction of the forearm bones may cause significant morbidity to the patients and require timely active surgical treatment. When the distal ulna is also lost, reconstruction of the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) is important to reduce the functional sequel. A case of reconstruction of a segmental bone defect of the radius and distal ulna with a double –barrel fibula flap and a metatarsal head free flap is presented. Pronation-supination was acceptable with good transverse stability of the forearm upon resisted elbow flexion.
    Injury 10/2014; · 2.46 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Treatment of complex hand trauma includes adequate debridement of nonviable tissue, early reconstruction, and careful selection of various available surgical procedures tailored to patients' needs and requests. Debridement of all necrotic tissue is crucial before any attempt at reconstruction. Surgeons should also consider cosmetic outcomes of the reconstructed hand and donor-site morbidity. For best results reconstruction should be performed early, with proper early postoperative therapy. This article reviews the principles and surgical options in the management of complex hand injuries involving the dorsal and the palmar aspects of the hand, and the different types of tissue in the hand.
    Clinics in Plastic Surgery 07/2014; 41(3):361-383. · 1.35 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Few reports have been published to help in guiding the treatment of diaphyseal forearm non-unions and in particular regarding isolated ulna non-unions. Aim of this work is to report our experience in the treatment of diaphyseal ulna non–union. The patients have been treated with osteosynthesis using a dynamic compression plate and biological enhancement of the consolidation using bone graft and autologous platelet injection. The follow-up consisted of clinical and radiographic assessment. Functional scores used were the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain and the Disability Assessment for the Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. The mean time of follow-up was 21 months. Considering both clinical and radiological criteria, bony union was achieved in 9/10 cases on average time of 4 months. According to the system of Anderson, 5 patients provided an excellent result, 2 a satisfactory result, 2 an unsatisfactory result and 1 treatment resulted in failure. At follow-up, the mean VAS score for pain in the upper limb was 1 (range, 0–4) at rest and 2 (range, 0–7) during activities.The physical function and symptoms of the upper limb, evaluated with the DASH questionnaire, scored 17 points. In conclusion, at a mean 21 months follow-up, there was high success regarding both forearm alignment, clinical and functional results.The use of three combined methods provides high success regarding both radiological and clinical results, even if we have no information on the prevalent efficacy of one particular method.
    Riv Chir Mano. 01/2013; 43:54-61.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
100 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014