Thermal expansion coefficient and bulk modulus of polyethylene closed‐cell foams

Journal of Polymer Science Part B Polymer Physics (Impact Factor: 2.22). 10/2004; 42(20):3741 - 3749. DOI: 10.1002/polb.20230

ABSTRACT A regular Kelvin foam model was used to predict the linear thermal expansion coefficient and bulk modulus of crosslinked, closed-cell, low-density polyethylene (LDPE) foams from the polymer and gas properties. The materials used for the experimental measurements were crosslinked, had a uniform cell size, and were nearly isotropic. Young's modulus of biaxially oriented polyethylene was used for modeling the cell faces. The model underestimated the foam linear thermal expansion coefficient because it assumed that the cell faces were flat. However, scanning electron microscopy showed that some cell faces were crumpled as a result of foam processing. The measured bulk modulus, which was considerably smaller than the theoretical value, was used to estimate the linear thermal expansion coefficient of the LDPE foams. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phys 42: 3741–3749, 2004

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Finite element analysis, of regular Kelvin foam models with all the material in uniform-thickness faces, was used to predict the compressive impact response of low-density closed-cell polyethylene and polystyrene foams. Cell air compression was analysed, treating cells as surface-based fluid cavities. For a typical 1 mm cell size and 50 s-1 impact strain rate, the elastic buckling of cell faces, and pop-in shape inversion of some buckled square faces, caused a non-linear stress strain response before yield. Pairs of plastic hinges formed across hexagonal faces, then yield occurred when trios of faces concertinaed. The predicted compressive yield stresses were close to experimental data, for a range of foam densities. Air compression was the hardening mechanism for engineering strains < 0.6, with face- to-face contact also contributing for strains > 0.7. Predictions of lateral expansion and residual strains after impact were reasonable. There were no significant changes in the predicted behavior at a compressive strain rate of 500 s-1.
    International Journal of Solids and Structures 02/2009; · 2.04 Impact Factor
  • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology-transactions of The Asme - J ENG MATER TECHNOL. 01/2008; 130(4).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Low-density closed-cell aluminum foam is promising to be used as load-bearing and thermal insulation components. It is necessary to systematically study its thermal expansion performance. In this work, linear thermal expansion coefficient (LTEC) of the closed-cell aluminum foam of different density was measured in the temperature range of 100–500 °C. X-ray fluorescence was used to analyze elemental composition of the cell wall material. Phase transition characteristics were analyzed with X-ray diffraction and differential scanning calorimetry. LTEC of the closed-cell aluminum foam was found to be dominated by its cell wall property and independent of its density. Particularly, two anomalies were found and experimentally analyzed. Due to the release of the residual tensile stress, the LTEC declined and even exhibited negative values. After several thermal cycles, the residual stress vanished. With temperature higher than 300 °C, instantaneous LTEC showed hysteresis, which should result from the redistribution of some residual hydrogen in the Ti2Al20Ca lattice.
    Chinese Science Bulletin 10/2014; 59(28):3669-3675. · 1.37 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 10, 2014