Article

CQC modal combination rule for high‐frequency modes

Department of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, U.S.A.
Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics (Impact Factor: 1.95). 11/1993; 22(11):943 - 956. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290221103

ABSTRACT The CQC rule for modal combination is extended to include the quasi-static contribution of truncated modes and the effects of input narrow-bandedness and cut-off frequency. A simple measure of the error in approximating a high-frequency modal response by its quasi-static contribution is derived. The extended rule is applicable to structures with high-frequency modes and to seismic inputs which may not be regarded as wide band. Numerical examples demonstrate the significance of input bandwidth and cut-off frequency on modal cross-correlation coefficients, and on the error resulting from truncation of high-freqeuncy modes.

5 Followers
 · 
556 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The complete Square-Root-of-Sum-of-Squares (c-SRSS) modal combination rule is presented. It expresses the structural response in terms of uncoupled SDOF modal responses, yet accounting fully for modal response variances and cross-covariances. Thus, it is an improvement over the classical SRSS rule which neglects contributions from modal cross-covariances. In the c-SRSS rule the spectral moments of the structural response are expressed rigorously in terms of the spectral moments of uncoupled modal responses and of some coefficients that can be computed straightforwardly as a function of modal frequencies and damping, without involving the computation of cross-correlation coefficients between modal responses. An example shows an application of the c-SRSS rule for structural systems with well separated and closely spaced modal frequencies, subjected to wide-band and narrow-band excitations. Comparisons with response calculations using the SRSS and the Complete Quadratic Combination rules are given and discussed in detail. Based on the c-SRSS rule a response spectrum formulation is introduced to estimate the maximum structural response. An example considering a narrow-band excitation from the great Mexico earthquake of September 19, 1985, is given and the accuracy of the response spectrum formulation is examined. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
    Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 09/2011; 40(11). DOI:10.1002/eqe.1082 · 1.95 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The objective of this paper is to describe the modelling of earthquake response spectra for strike slip earthquakes in the near and far field and assess the statistical significance of its fitting to strong motion data. The present data set consists of strong motion records from two magnitude 6½ events that occurred in the South-Iceland seismic zone in June 2000. This provides us with a data set consisting of roughly 47 records obtained in the two earthquakes, with epicentral distances between 5 and 150 km and hypocentral depth less than 10 km. The attenuation model of the sdof response spectrum is derived in a closed form based on the Brune spectra for the near-and the far-field, modelling the high frequency tail in both cases by an exponential function. The closed form solution is found to be advantageous in studies on structural reliability and risk. The main results are that the derived models fits the data fairly well providing residuals comparable to the residuals of models obtained by the widely used regression analysis. Furthermore, the response spectra attenuate with increasing distance more rapidly than R -1 where R is the distance to causative fault. The model based on the Brune theory is found to be adequate from an engineering point of view for many applications. It is also considerably more straightforward to apply than models based on the Haskel-Savage theory, although they may give a better fit to the response data, especially in the high frequency range of the response spectrum.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Assessment of structural performance under stochastic dynamic loadings requires estimation of the extremes of stochastic response components and the resultant responses as their linear and nonlinear combinations. This paper addresses the evaluations and combination rules for the extremes of scalar and vectorial resultant responses from two response components that may show non-Gaussian characteristics. The non-Gaussian response process is modeled as a translation process from an underlying Gaussian process. The mean crossing rates and extreme value distributions of resultant responses are calculated following the theory for vector-valued Gaussian processes. An extensive parameter study is conducted concerning the influence of statistical moments of non-Gaussian response components on the extremes of resultant responses. It is revealed that the existing combination rules developed for Gaussian processes are not applicable to the case of non-Gaussian process. New combination rules are suggested that permit predictions of the extremes of resultant responses directly from the extremes of response components. Keywords: Scalar combination; vectorial combination; non-Gaussian process; extreme value distribution; upcrossing theory; peak factor; combination rule Read More: http://www.worldscientific.com/doi/abs/10.1142/S0219455413500764
    International Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics 04/2014; 14(3):1350076-1 - 1350076-36. DOI:10.1142/S0219455413500764 · 1.06 Impact Factor