Article

Major differences in bleeding symptoms between factor VII deficiency and hemophilia B

Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis (Impact Factor: 6.08). 04/2009; 7(5):774 - 779. DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2009.03329.x

ABSTRACT Background: The autosomally-inherited factor VII (FVII) deficiency and X-linked hemophilia B offer an attractive model to investigate whether reduced levels of FVII and FIX, acting in the initiation and amplification of coagulation respectively, influence hemostasis to a different extent in relation to age and bleeding site. Methods: Hemophilia B patients (n = 296) and FVII-deficient males (n = 109) were compared for FVII/FIX clotting activity, F7/F9 genotypes and clinical phenotypes in a retrospective, multi-centre, cohort study. Results: Major clinical differences between diseases were observed. Bleeding occurred earlier in hemophilia B (median age 2.0 years, IR 0.9–5.0) than in FVII deficiency (5.2 years, IR 1.9–15.5) and the bleeding-free survival in FVII deficiency was similar to that observed in ‘mild’ hemophilia B (P = 0.96). The most frequent disease-presenting symptoms in hemophilia B (hematomas and oral bleeding) differed from those in FVII deficiency (epistaxis and central nervous system bleeding). Differences were confirmed by analysis of FVII-deficient women. Conclusions: Our data support the notion that low FVII levels sustain hemostasis better than similarly reduced FIX levels. On the other hand, minute amounts of FVII, differently to FIX, are needed to prevent fatal bleeding, as indicated by the rarity of null mutations and the associated life-threatening symptoms in FVII deficiency, which contributes towards shaping clinical differences between diseases in the lowest factor level range. Differences between diseases are only partially explained by mutational patterns and could pertain to the specific roles of FVII and FIX in coagulation phases and to vascular bed-specific components.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
89 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Individuals with inherited factor VII (FVII) deficiency display bleeding phenotypes ranging from mild to severe, with 30% of patients having always been asymptomatic (non-bleeding). In 626 FVII-deficient individuals, by analysing data from the International Factor VII (IF7) Registry and the Seven Treatment Evaluation Registry (STER), we determined whether bleeding type at disease presentation and FVII coagulant activity (FVIIc) predict ensuing bleeds. At disease presentation/diagnosis, 272 (43.5%) individuals were non-bleeding, 277 (44.2%) had minor bleeds, and 77 (12.3%) had major bleeds. During a median nine-year index period (IP) observation, 87.9% of non-bleeding individuals at presentation remained asymptomatic, 75.1% of minor-bleeders had new minor bleeds, and 83.1% of major-bleeders experienced new major bleeds. After adjusting for FVIIc levels and other clinical and demographic variables, the relative risk (RR) for ensuing bleedings during the IP was 6.02 (p <0.001) and 5.87 (p <0.001) in individuals presenting with major and minor bleeds, respectively. Conversely, compared to non-bleeding individuals, a 10.95 (p = 0.001) and 28.21 (p <0.001) RR for major bleedings during the IP was found in those with minor and with major bleeds at presentation, respectively. In conclusion, in FVII deficiency, the first bleeding symptom is an independent predictor of the risk of subsequent major bleeds.
    Thrombosis and Haemostasis 03/2013; 109(6). · 5.76 Impact Factor
  • Source
    British Journal of Haematology 08/2014; · 4.94 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bleeding symptoms are frequently reported even in otherwise healthy subjects, and differentiating a normal subject from a patient with a mild bleeding disorder (MBD) can be extremely challenging. The concept of bleeding rate, that is, the number of bleeding episodes occurring within a definite time, could be used as the unifying framework reconciling the bleeding risk observed in congenital and acquired coagulopathies into a single picture. For instance, primary prevention trials have shown that the incidence of non-major bleeding symptoms in normal subjects is around five per 100 person-years, and this figure is in accordance with the number of hemorrhagic symptoms reported by normal controls in observational studies on hemorrhagic disorders. The incidence of non-major bleeding in patients with MBDs (e.g. in patients with type 1 VWD carrying the C1130F mutation) is also strikingly similar with that of patients taking antiplatelet drugs, and the incidence in moderately severe bleeding disorders (e.g. type 2 VWD) parallels that of patients taking vitamin K antagonists. The severity of a bleeding disorder may therefore be explained by a bleeding rate model, which also explains several common clinical observations. Appreciation of the bleeding rate of congenital and acquired conditions and of its environmental/genetic modifiers into a single framework will possibly allow the development of better prediction tools in the coming years and represents a major scientific effort to be pursued.
    Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis 06/2013; 11(s1). · 6.08 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Download
4 Downloads
Available from
Dec 9, 2014