Article

Caregiver Symptom Burden: The Risk of Caring for an Underserved Patient With Advanced Cancer

Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.9). 03/2011; 117(5):1070 - 1079. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.25695

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND:The growing diversity of the population of the United States and the high burden of cancer-related symptoms reflect the need for caregiver research within underserved groups. In this longitudinal study, the authors assessed changes in symptom severity in caregivers and underserved minority patients diagnosed with advanced solid tumors who were being treated at public hospitals.METHODS:A total of 85 matched patient-caregiver dyads completed the M. D. Anderson Symptom Inventory 3 times during 20 weeks of chemotherapy. At each time point, symptom severity and interference with daily activities were assessed. Group-based trajectory modeling was used to classify caregivers into high-symptom or low-symptom burden groups.RESULTS:Sadness and distress were more prevalent among caregivers (P = .005). Symptom burden remained stable among caregivers in the high-symptom group (40%), whereas the low-symptom group (60%) demonstrated a statistically significant decrease over time. Multivariate analysis found being a family-member caregiver (adjusted odds ratio [ADJ-OR], 4.1; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.4-11.6) and caring for a highly symptomatic patient (ADJ-OR, 8.0; 95% CI, 1.5-41.4), rather than race, ethnicity, or sociodemographic characteristics, were significant predictors of the caregiver's membership in the high-symptom burden group.CONCLUSIONS:Approximately 40% of the caregivers in the current study were found to be at an increased risk for moderate to severe sadness and distress, which remained severe throughout the patient's treatment course at public hospitals. To the authors' knowledge, this study marks the first time that the concept of symptom burden has been used to measure caregiver burden, and the first time that symptom burden has been measured and documented in dyads of caregivers and underserved minority patients. Cancer 2011. © 2010 American Cancer Society.

Download full-text

Full-text

Available from: Araceli Garcia-Gonzalez, Dec 13, 2013
1 Follower
 · 
131 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract To help family caregivers (FCs), social workers need to understand the complexity of FC's experiences and challenges. For this systematic review, several relevant, multidisciplinary electronic databases were searched. Of 1643 titles identified, 108 articles met the inclusion criteria and are included in this review. Various experiences, symptoms and burden related to caregiving responsibilities are described and discussed. The understanding evolving from this study about the FC's own health risk, caregiver burden and experiences over time can enhance social worker's awareness of FC's challenging situation and the potential impact this has on the FC's ability to provide care to the patient.
    Journal of Gerontological Social Work 03/2014; DOI:10.1080/01634372.2014.881450
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Measuring effects of cancer on family caregivers is important to develop methods which can improve their quality of life (QOL) . Nevertheless, up to now, only a few tools have been developed to be used in this group. Among those, the Caregiver Quality of Life Index-Cancer Scale (CQOLC) has met minimum psychometric criteria in different populations in spite of conflicting results. The present study was conducted to evaluate reliability and validity of CQOLC among Turkish cancer family caregivers. Materials and Methods: The CQOLC was administered to 120 caregivers, along with Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Medical Outcomes Study MOS 36- Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS). Internal consistency and test-retest stability were used to investigate reliability. Construct validity was examined by using known group method, convergent, and divergent validity. For the known group method, we hypothesized that CQOLC scores would differ between depressed and non-depressed subjects. We investigated convergent validity by correlating scores for CQOLC with scores for other similar measures including SF-36 and STAI. The MSPSS was completed at the same time as CQOLC to provide divergent validity. Results: The values for internal consistency and test-retest correlation were 0.88 and 0.96, respectively. The CQOLC discriminated those who were depressed from those who were not. Convergent validity supported strong correlations between CQOLC scores and two main component scores (PCS, MCS) in SF-36 although there was a weak correlation between CQOLC and STAI scores. Regarding divergent validity, the correlation between CQOLC and MSPSS was in the low range, as expected. Conclusions: The Turkish CQOLC is a reliable and valid tool and it can be utilized to determine QOL of family caregivers.
    Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention: APJCP 07/2013; 14(7):4415-9. DOI:10.7314/APJCP.2013.14.7.4415 · 1.50 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Navigation services may be strengthened by establishing a partnership between the patient, family/caregiver, and the navigator. Involvement of a patient's familial or social network in the navigation process would allow patient navigators to spend more time and resources with the subset of patients who do not have support from family and friends. The Partnership Approach evolves from combining the strength of a patient's existing social support and network with the delivery of navigation services. To develop this novel approach, the Family and Caregiver Workgroup was convened at the American Cancer Society's National Leadership Summit. Individuals were asked to serve in this group due to their interest, research, or experience in family and caregiver issues. By the end of the Summit, the workgroup had achieved 3 major outcomes: 1) enhancement of current patient navigation services by building a partnership between the patient, family or primary caregivers, and navigators; 2) identification of a set of core functions that a family/caregiver could perform in a partnership; and 3) consensus on a set of metrics to use with caregivers and patients. Five major domains were selected to measure patient and/or caregiver outcomes: quality of life, satisfaction with care, social support, distress, and caregiver burden. Metrics appropriate for each domain were recommended. Integration of these domains and scales in current navigation services is needed to develop future research. Evidence from such research would help determine whether the Partnership Approach contributes to improved patient and caregiver outcomes.
    Cancer 08/2011; 117(15 Suppl):3592-3602. DOI:10.1002/cncr.26263 · 4.90 Impact Factor