Article

A Comprehensive Meta-regression Analysis on Outcome of Anatomic Resection Versus Nonanatomic Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Liver and Multiorgan Transplant Unit, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, .
Annals of Surgical Oncology (Impact Factor: 4.12). 06/2012; 19(12):3697-705. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-012-2450-z
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT It remains unclear whether hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma should be performed as an anatomic resection (AR) or a nonanatomic resection (NAR). Because no randomized controlled trials are currently available on this topic, a meta-regression analysis was performed on available observational studies to control for confounding variables.
A systematic review of studies published from 1990 to 2011 in the PubMed and Embase databases was performed. Patient and disease-free survival (DFS), postoperative mortality, and morbidity were considered as outcomes. Results are expressed as relative risk (RR) or weighted mean differences with 95 % of confidence interval.
Eighteen observational studies involving 9,036 patients were analyzed: 4,012 were in the AR group and 5,024 in the NAR group. Meta-analysis suggested that AR provided better 5-year patient survival (RR 1.14; P = 0.001) and DFS than NAR (RR 1.38; P = 0.001). However, patients in the NAR group were characterized by a higher prevalence of cirrhosis (RR 1.27; P = 0.010), more advanced hepatic dysfunction (RR 0.90 for Child-Pugh class A; P = 0.001) and smaller tumor size (weighted mean difference 0.36 cm; P < 0.001) compared with patients in the AR group. Meta-regression analysis showed that the different proportion of cirrhosis in the NAR group significantly affected both 5-year patient survival (RR 1.28; P = 0.016) and DFS (RR 1.74; P = 0.022). Tumor size only slightly affected DFS (RR 1.72; P = 0.076). Postoperative mortality and morbidity were unaffected (P > 0.05 in all cases).
Patient survival and DFS after AR seem to be superior to NAR because the worse liver function reserve in the NAR group significantly affects prognosis.

1 Bookmark
 · 
111 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: It has been highly controversial whether the elevated serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level before hepatectomy predicts recurrence and mortality of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or not. This study is to identify whether the index predict the recurrence and mortality after hepatectomy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Of 568 consecutive patients, 342 with normal liver function (Child-Pugh score, 5) and no macro-vascular invasion were enrolled between April 2000 and March 2013. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). In multivariate analysis, the elevated serum AFP level was an independent risk factor for DFS (hazard ratio [HR], 1.9; P <0.0001) and OS (HR, 2.0; P <0.0001). The histological hepatic venous tumor thrombus was also an independent risk factor for DFS (HR, 2.6; P <0.0001) and OS (HR, 2.5; P =0.001). Anatomic resection decreases the risk factor for recurrence after hepatectomy (HR, 0.6; P=0.003), though it did not decrease the risk for OS (P=0.3). At 5 years, DFS rates were 42% and 21% (P < 0.0001) and OS rates were 75% and 46% among patients with low and high AFP levels, respectively (P < 0.0001). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUROCs) of serum AFP and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) were 0.65 and 0.58 for DFS and 0.65 and 0.57 for OS, respectively. Tumor size was the best predictor of micro-vascular invasion (AUROC = 0.70, P < 0.0001). Serum AFP had a highly reliable indices for DFS and OS (247 words).
    Hepatology Research 04/2014; · 2.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma, the sixth most common neoplasm and the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, represents an important clinical problem, since it may occur after both surgical and medical treatment. The recurrence rate involves 2 phases: an early phase and a late phase. The early phase usually occurs within 2 years after resection; it is mainly related to local invasion and intrahepatic metastases and, therefore, to the intrinsic biology of the tumor. On the other hand, the late phase occurs more than 2 years after surgery and is mainly related to de novo tumor formation as a consequence of the carcinogenic cirrhotic environment. Since recent studies have reported that early and late recurrences may have different risk factors, it is clinically important to recognize these factors in the individual patient as soon as possible. The aim of this review was, therefore, to identify predicting factors for the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma, by means of invasive and non-invasive methods, according to the different therapeutic strategies available. In particular the role of emerging techniques (e.g., transient elastography) and biological features of hepatocellular carcinoma in predicting recurrence have been discussed. In particular, invasive methods were differentiated from non-invasive ones for research purposes, taking into consideration the emerging role of the genetic signature of hepatocellular carcinoma in order to better allocate treatment strategies and surveillance follow-up in patients with this type of tumor.
    World journal of gastroenterology : WJG. 05/2014; 20(20):5935-5950.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To compare clinical outcomes between surgical resection (RES) and nonsurgical-RES (nRES) ablation therapies for small hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    World journal of gastroenterology : WJG. 08/2014; 20(29):10174-82.