Aspirin but not ibuprofen use is associated with reduced risk of prostate cancer: a PLCO Study

Department of Human Health and Services, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Rockville, MD, USA.
British Journal of Cancer (Impact Factor: 4.82). 06/2012; 107(1):207-14. DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.227
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Although most epidemiological studies suggest that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is inversely associated with prostate cancer risk, the magnitude and specificity of this association remain unclear.
We examined self-reported aspirin and ibuprofen use in relation to prostate cancer risk among 29 450 men ages 55-74 who were initially screened for prostate cancer from 1993 to 2001 in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. Men were followed from their first screening exam until 31 December 2009, during which 3575 cases of prostate cancer were identified.
After adjusting for potential confounders, the hazard ratios (HRs) of prostate cancer associated with <1 and ≥ 1 pill of aspirin daily were 0.98 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.90-1.07) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85-0.99), respectively, compared with never use (P for trend 0.04). The effect of taking at least one aspirin daily was more pronounced when restricting the analyses to men older than age 65 or men who had a history of cardiovascular-related diseases or arthritis (HR (95% CI); 0.87 (0.78-0.97), 0.89 (0.80-0.99), and 0.88 (0.78-1.00), respectively). The data did not support an association between ibuprofen use and prostate cancer risk.
Daily aspirin use, but not ibuprofen use, was associated with lower risk of prostate cancer risk.

Download full-text


Available from: Jill Koshiol, Jan 27, 2014
  • Source
    • "COX-2 is overexpressed in numerous premalignant and malignant lesions, including colorectal cancer [20]. It has also been shown that inhibition of inflammatory mediators with anti-inflammatory drugs decreases cancer incidence and progression in patients with cancer [21] [22] [23] [24] [25]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is a strong relationship between metabolism and immunity, which can become deleterious under conditions of metabolic stress. Obesity, considered a chronic inflammatory disease, is one example of this link. Chronic inflammation is increasingly being recognized as an etiology in several cancers, particularly those of epithelial origin, and therefore a potential link between obesity and cancer. In this review, the connection between the different factors that can lead to the chronic inflammatory state in the obese individual, as well as their effect in tumorigenesis, is addressed. Furthermore, the association between obesity, inflammation, and esophageal, liver, colon, postmenopausal breast, and endometrial cancers is discussed.
    01/2013; 2013:697521. DOI:10.1155/2013/697521
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In 2011, The National Cancer Institute (NCI) has announced 24 provocative questions on cancer. Some of these questions have been already answered in "NCI's provocative questions on cancer: some answers to ignite discussion" (published in Oncotarget, 2011, 2: 1352.) The questions included "Why do many cancer cells die when suddenly deprived of a protein encoded by an oncogene?" "Can we extend patient survival by using approaches that keep tumors static?" "Why are some disseminated cancers cured by chemotherapy alone?" "Can we develop methods to rapidly test interventions for cancer treatment or prevention?" "Can we use our knowledge of aging to enhance prevention or treatment of cancer?" "What is the mechanism by which some drugs commonly and chronically used for other indications protect against cancer?" "How does obesity contribute to cancer risk?" I devoted a single subchapter to each the answer. As expected, the provocative questions were very diverse and numerous. Now I choose and combine, as a single problem, only three last questions, all related to common mechanisms and treatment of age-related diseases including obesity and cancer. Can we use common existing drugs for cancer prevention and treatment? Can we use some targeted "cancer-selective" agents for other diseases and … aging itself.
    Oncotarget 12/2012; 3(12):1711-24. · 6.63 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: α-Methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR; P504S) catalyzes a key chiral inversion step in the metabolism of branched-chain fatty acids, ibuprofen and related drugs. Protein levels are increased in all prostate and some other cancer cells and it is used as a marker (P504S). The enzyme requires no cofactors and catalyzes its reaction by a stepwise 1,1-proton transfer via an enolate intermediate. The biological role of AMACR in cancer is complex, linking lipid metabolism with nuclear receptor (e.g. FXR and PPAR) activity and expression of enzymes such as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2). The roles of the various splice variants and the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in cancers are discussed. A number of rationally designed AMACR inhibitors have been reported in the literature as potential cancer treatments. The opportunities and challenges for development of acyl-CoA esters as inhibitors are discussed from a medicinal chemical viewpoint. Other challenges for drug development include the problems in assaying enzymatic activity and the prediction of structure-activity relationships (SAR). Inhibitors of AMACR have potential to provide a novel treatment for castrate-resistant prostate cancers but this potential can only be realized once the biology is well understood. Recent work on the role of AMACR in parasitic diseases is also reviewed.
    Progress in lipid research 01/2013; DOI:10.1016/j.plipres.2013.01.001 · 12.96 Impact Factor