Deformations within moving kinetochores reveal different sites of active and passive force generation.

Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Science (Impact Factor: 31.2). 06/2012; 337(6092):355-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.1221886
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Kinetochores mediate chromosome segregation at mitosis. They are thought to contain both active, force-producing and passive, frictional interfaces with microtubules whose relative locations have been unclear. We inferred mechanical deformation within single kinetochores during metaphase oscillations by measuring average separations between fluorescently labeled kinetochore subunits in living cells undergoing mitosis. Inter-subunit distances were shorter in kinetochores moving toward poles than in those moving away. Inter-subunit separation decreased abruptly when kinetochores switched to poleward movement and decreased further when pulling force increased, suggesting that active force generation during poleward movement compresses kinetochores. The data revealed an active force-generating interface within kinetochores and a separate passive frictional interface located at least 20 nanometers away poleward. Together, these interfaces allow persistent attachment with intermittent active force generation.

  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The kinetochore, the proteinaceous structure on the mitotic centromere, functions as a mechanical latch that hooks onto microtubules to support directional movement of chromosomes. The structure also brings in a number of signaling molecules, such as kinases and phosphatases, which regulate microtubule dynamics and cell cycle progression. Erroneous microtubule attachment is destabilized by Aurora B-mediated phosphorylation of multiple microtubule-binding protein complexes at the kinetochore, such as the KMN network proteins and the Ska/Dam1 complex, while Plk-dependent phosphorylation of BubR1 stabilizes kinetochore-microtubule attachment by recruiting PP2A-B56. Spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) signaling, which is activated by unattached kinetochores and inhibits the metaphase-to-anaphase transition, depends on kinetochore recruitment of the kinase Bub1 through Mps1-mediated phosphorylation of the kinetochore protein KNL1 (also known as Blinkin in mammals, Spc105 in budding yeast, and Spc7 in fission yeast). Recruitment of protein phosphatase 1 to KNL1 is necessary to silence the SAC upon bioriented microtubule attachment. One of the key unsolved questions in the mitosis field is how a mechanical change at the kinetochore upon microtubule attachment is converted to these and other chemical signals that control microtubule attachment and the SAC. Rapid progress in the field is revealing the existence of an intricate signaling network created right on the kinetochore. Here we review the current understanding of phosphorylation-mediated regulation of kinetochore functions and discuss how this signaling network generates an accurate switch that turns on and off the signaling output in response to kinetochore-microtubule attachment.
    Chromosoma 03/2013; · 3.34 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Before cell division, two identical copies of chromosomes are pulled apart by microtubule (MT) filaments that approach the chromosomes from the opposite poles a mitotic spindle. Connection between the MTs and the chromosomes are mediated by a molecular complex called kinetochore. An externally applied tension can lead to detachment of the MTs from the kinetochore; the mean lifetime of such an attachment is essentially a mean first-passage time. In their in-vitro pioneering single-kinetochore experiments, Akiyoshi et al. (Nature 468, 576 (2010)), observed that the mean lifetimes of reconstituted MT-kinetochore attachments vary non-monotonically with increasing tension. The counter-intuitive stabilization of the attachments by small load forces was interpreted in terms of a catch-bond-like mechanism based on a phenomenological 2-state kinetic model. Here we develop the first detailed microscopic model for studying the dependence of the lifetime of the MT-kinetochore attachment on (a) the structure, (b) energetics, and (c) kinetics of the coupling. The catch-bond-like mechanism emerges naturally from this model. Moreover, in-silico experiments on this model reveal further interesting phenomena, arising from the subtle effects of competing sub-processes, which are likely to motivate new experiments in this emerging area of single-particle biophysics.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Aurora B kinase coordinates kinetochore-microtubule attachments with spindle checkpoint signaling on each mitotic chromosome. We find that EB1, a microtubule plus end-tracking protein, is required to enrich Aurora B at inner centromeres in a microtubule-dependent manner. This regulates phosphorylation of both kinetochore and chromatin substrates. EB1 regulates the histone phosphorylation marks (histone H2A phospho-Thr120 and histone H3 phospho-Thr3) that localize Aurora B. The chromosomal passenger complex containing Aurora B can be found on a subset of spindle microtubules that exist near prometaphase kinetochores, known as preformed K-fibers (kinetochore fibers). Our data suggest that EB1 enables the spindle microtubules to regulate the phosphorylation of kinetochores through recruitment of the Aurora B kinase.
    The Journal of Cell Biology 03/2014; · 10.82 Impact Factor


Available from