Article

Percutaneous Pinning of Fractures in the Proximal Third of the Proximal Phalanx: Complications and Outcomes

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hand Surgery, Naval Medical Center Portsmouth, Portsmouth, VA 237008-2197, USA.
The Journal of hand surgery (Impact Factor: 1.66). 07/2012; 37(7):1342-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2012.04.019
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT Two common techniques for fixation of extra-articular fractures at the proximal phalanx base are transarticular (across the metacarpophalangeal joint) and extra-articular cross-pinning. The aim of this study was to assess the complications and outcomes of these 2 techniques. Our hypothesis was that transarticular and extra-articular closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of base of proximal phalanx fractures have similar complication rates and outcomes.
A retrospective chart review identified 338 patients with base of proximal phalanx fractures. We treated 50 isolated fractures with closed reduction and percutaneous pinning using 1 of 2 techniques: transarticular (25 fractures through the metacarpal head) or extra-articular (25 fractures cross-pinned through the base of the proximal phalanx). Outcome measures included total active motion and complications.
We found a substantial overall complication rate in both groups. The mean total active motion for the transarticular group and cross-pinning group was 201° and 198°, respectively. Proximal interphalangeal joint motion was notably affected; nearly half of the patients in each group had flexion loss greater than 20° (average, 27°) at the proximal interphalangeal joint. Nearly a third of patients in both groups had fixed flexion contracture greater than 15° at the proximal interphalangeal joint. There were more secondary procedures in the transarticular group (6) than in the cross-pinning group (2). There was no statistical significance between groups in any of the outcome parameters used.
Closed pinning minimizes additional soft tissue injury and allows for early motion, but neither fixation method was superior in terms of the measured parameters. In addition, overall results were not as good as what has been reported in the literature.

0 Followers
 · 
188 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is no outcome measure designated as the gold standard when assessing the treatment results following fractures of the hand. Numerous measures have been described in the literature, but only a limited number have been validated to specifically evaluate functional recovery with respect to hand fractures. Of the outcome measures validated for use with hand fractures, few have been studied in comparative trials designed to analyze their ability to predict functional recovery. This review article provides an evidence-based description of the validated scales and scores frequently used in assessing the functional outcomes and their ability to predict recovery.
    Hand clinics 11/2013; 29(4):621-30. DOI:10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.013 · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Selecting the appropriate treatment method for hand fractures is challenging due to the wide spectrum of presentation and the enormous array of surgical and nonoperative treatment options. Unfortunately, the scientific evidence to help guide decision making is not of high quality. Because of this, the surgeon must rely on a few basic principles to guide treatment. This article provides an overview of the scientific evidence, and discusses the principles and rationale used to treat hand fractures.
    Hand clinics 11/2013; 29(4):501-5. DOI:10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.005 · 1.07 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This article discusses unstable finger fractures that require internal fixation to achieve bony stability and joint congruity. The article explains the value of minimally invasive closed reduction and K-wire fixation for the treatment of phalangeal fractures, as well as early protected movement for these K wired fingers, following the concept of early protected movement for flexor tendon repairs.
    Hand clinics 02/2014; 30(1):7-15. DOI:10.1016/j.hcl.2013.08.014 · 1.07 Impact Factor
Show more