Mandibular elevator muscles: physiology, action, and effect of dental occlusion

Department of Oral Function and Physiology, School of Dentistry, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
European Journal Of Oral Sciences (Impact Factor: 1.42). 09/1993; 101(5):314 - 331. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.1993.tb01127.x

ABSTRACT In spite of differences in embryologic origin, central nervous organization, and muscle fiber distribution, the physiology and action of mandibular elevator muscles are comparable to those of skeletal muscles of the limbs, back, and shoulder. They also share the same age-, sex-, and activity-related variations of muscular strength. With respect to pathogenesis, the type of muscular performance associated with the development of fatigue, discomfort, and pain in mandibular elevators seems to be influenced by the dental occlusion. Clinical research comparing the extent of occlusal contact in patients and controls as well as epidemiologic studies have shown reduced occlusal support to be a risk factor in the development of craniomandibular disorders. In healthy subjects with full natural dentition, occlusal support in the intercuspal position generally amounts to 12–14 pairs of contacting teeth, with predominance of contact on first and second molars. The extent of occlusal contact clearly affects electric muscle activity, bite force, jaw movements, and masticatory efficiency. Neurophysiologic evidence of receptor activity and reflex interaction with the basic motor programs of craniomandibular muscles tends to indicate that the peripheral occlusal control of the elevator muscles is provided by feedback from periodontal pressoreceptors. With stable intercuspal support, especially from posterior teeth, elevator muscles are activated strongly during biting and chewing with a high degree of force and masticatory efficiency, and with relatively short contractions, allowing for pauses. These variables of muscle contraction seem, in general, to strengthen the muscles and prevent discomfort. Therefore, occlusal stability keeps the muscles fit, and enables the masticatory system to meet its functional demands.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: [Purpose] This study was conducted to investigate the changes in torque and power during flexion and extension of the shoulder and the knee joints caused by midline correction using mouth guards made from different materials in adults with mild midline discrepancy. [Subjects] The subjects of this study were males (n=12) in their 20s who showed a 3-5 mm difference between the midlines of the upper and lower teeth but had normal masticatory function. [Methods] The torque and average power of the lower limb and upper limb were measured during flexion and extension according to various types of mouth guard. [Results] There were significant differences in relative torque and average power between three conditions (no mouth guard, soft-type mouth guard, and hard-type mouth guard) at shoulder flexion and extension. There were no significant differences in relative torque and average power between the three conditions at knee flexion and extension. [Conclusions] These results suggest that use of a mouth guard is a method by which people with a mild midline discrepancy can improve the stability of the entire body.
    Journal of Physical Therapy Science 07/2014; 26(7):1051-3. · 0.18 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Occlusal devices can protect the dentition from attrition and are commonly prescribed for the treatment of myogen-ous orofacial pain. The occlusal scheme of the device controls the forces on teeth during mandibular closure and excursions. Smooth anterior guidance from anterior teeth contact and posterior teeth disclusion has been described as a component of a therapeutic occlusion. Clinical research on the effects of occlusal devices is extensive, but documentation about the actual occlusion studied is lacking. A classification of anterior guidance design for occlusal devices and the rationale for optimum force distribution is presented. This classification can guide clinicians as to the criteria for proper occlusal device fabrication and improve dental research.
    The Journal of prosthetic dentistry 10/2013; 110(4):259-263. · 1.22 Impact Factor
  • Source


Available from
May 23, 2014