Article

Adsorption of ammonia on activated carbon from aqueous solutions

Environmental Progress (Impact Factor: 0.92). 06/2008; 27(2):225 - 233. DOI: 10.1002/ep.10252

ABSTRACT In this study, adsorption of ammonia on activated carbon from aqueous solutions has been studied in a batch stirred cell. Experiments have been carried out to investigate the effects of temperature, ammonia concentration, and activated carbon dose on ammonia adsorption. The experimental results manifest that the ammonia adsorption rate on activated carbon increases with its concentration in the aqueous solutions. Ammonia adsorption also increases with temperature. The ammonia removal from the solution increases as activated carbon mass increases. The Langmuir and Freundlich equilibrium isotherm models are found to provide a good fitting of the adsorption data, with r2 = 0.9749 and 0.9846, respectively. The adsorption capacity of ammonia obtained from the Langmuir equilibrium isotherm model is found to be 17.19 mg g−1. The kinetic study shows that ammonia adsorption on the activated carbon is in good compliance with the pseudo-second-order kinetic model. The thermodynamic parameters (▵G°, ▵H°, ▵S°) obtained indicate the endothermic nature of ammonia adsorption on activated carbon. © 2008 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2008

0 Bookmarks
 · 
280 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As a consequence of the Water Framework Directive and Marine Strategy Framework Directive, there is now more focus on discharges from wastewater treatment plants both to transitional and marine-coastal waters. The constraint to encourage sustainable water policy to prevent water deterioration and reduce or stop discharges has entailed new requirements for existing wastewater treatment plants in the form of advanced wastewater treatment technologies as further suggested by the Integrated Pollution and Prevention Control Bureau. A whole toolbox of physico-chemical and ecotoxicological parameters to investigate commercial and mixed domestic and industrial discharges was considered to check the efficiency of an Activated-Sludge Sequencing Batch Reactor (AS-SBR) and two Ultra-Filtration Membrane Biological Reactors (UF-MBRs) on a small scale decentralised basis. All discharges were conveyed into Venice lagoon (Italy), one of the widest impacted Mediterranean transitional environment. The UF-MBRs were able to provide good quality effluents potentially suitable for non-potable reuse, as well as reducing specific inorganic micro-pollutants concentration (e.g. metals). Conversely, the AS-SBR showed unpredictable and discontinuous removal abilities.
    Water Research 08/2010; 44(15):4437-50. · 4.66 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In the present investigation, removal of ammonium from aqueous solutions by a compound containing silica was considered. The compound was a waste of ferrosilicon compound produced during Ferro-alloy manufacturing. The results showed that an increase in the pH of solution up to 7 caused a rapid increase in the adsorbed ammonium to 36.21 mg/g. But adsorbed ammonium was decreased to 26.51 mg/g as the initial pH reached to 10. The amount of adsorbed ammonium was increased with contact time and initial ammonium concentration. A contact time of 180 min was selected because there was no significant increment in adsorbed ammonium as contact time was further increased. The results exhibited suitability of the pseudo-second order kinetic model (R2 = 0.9867). Increasing initial ammonium concentration from 10 to 180 mg/L resulted in an increment in adsorbed ammonium from 6.69 to 59.13 mg/g, respectively. The obtained data were fitted to Langmuir, Freundlich, and Dubinin–Radushkevich (D-R) isotherm models in which the obtained correlation coefficient showed the relatively better fitness of the data to Langmuir model (R2 = 0.9969) with a maximum adsorption capacity of 78.74 mg/g. © 2014 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Environ Prog, 2014
    Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy 03/2014; · 0.87 Impact Factor
  • Bone 01/2011; 48. · 3.82 Impact Factor