Toward an Empirically Based Classification of Personality Pathology

Department of Psychology, University of Colorado
Clinical Psychology Science and Practice (Impact Factor: 2.92). 05/2007; 14(2):77 - 93. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2007.00065.x

ABSTRACT A number of investigations have utilized factor analysis or similar data analytic methods to examine the empirical validity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders classification system of Axis II personality pathology. This article reviews analyses of the Axis II cluster structure and the latent structure of individual personality disorder criteria. Overall, these studies do not provide sound empirical support for the current personality disorder organization described in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. They highlight the need for identifying the latent dimensions of personality pathology in order to create a different representation that would more accurately correspond to both a theoretical and functional model of personality disorder. Preliminary research identifying consensus across datasets is summarized. Clinical implications of these findings and future directions for research on personality pathology are discussed.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study explores longitudinally a four-factor structure of pathological personality trait dimensions (PPTDs) to examine both its structural stability and intra-individual changes among PPTDs over time. Personality Disorder (PD) scales of the Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III were administered to 361 low-income women with various psychiatric conditions (drug dependence, depression), who were followed in a two-wave study over 5-years. Cross-sectional and longitudinal factor analyses outlined a robust factorial structure of PPTDs, extrinsically invariant over time, representing Negative Emotionality, Introversion, Antagonism and Impulsivity. Despite moderate rank-order stability in the PPTDs, results also indicated substantial intra-individual variability in the degree and direction of change, consistent with trajectories of change in participants' clinical diagnoses. Results are discussed in light of current debates on the structure and dynamic of pathological personality.
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 06/2013; 35(2):173-185. · 1.55 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The review of Sheets and Craighead (2007) affirms the lack of discriminant validity of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders personality disorders, focusing in particular on the three clusters. They call for an empirically based, dimensional classification of personality disorder. Quite a bit of progress toward such an approach has occurred. This commentary emphasizes in particular the importance of having a dimensional model of personality disorder be integrated with general personality structure.
    Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 05/2007; 14(2):94 - 98. · 2.92 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: As Sheets and Craighead (2007) note, the current organization of personality disorders (PDs) in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM) is limited by excessive comorbidity among different forms of personality pathology and by co-occurrence of symptoms from ostensibly unrelated PDs. In this commentary, I offer an alternative solution to the syndrome- and symptom-level problems that characterize our current organization of PDs. This solution involves (a) formally conceptualizing each DSM PD using multiple theoretical frameworks, and (b) using psychological assessment data to obtain information relevant to key elements of these theoretical frameworks. Guidelines for multimodal assessment of PDs are offered, and suggestions for integrating diagnostic information and psychological test data are described.
    Clinical Psychology Science and Practice 05/2007; 14(2):99 - 102. · 2.92 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Jun 5, 2014