Communication Breakdown in the Outpatient Referral Process

Journal of General Internal Medicine (Impact Factor: 3.42). 08/2000; 15(9):626 - 631. DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2000.91119.x
Source: PubMed Central

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE: To evaluate primary care and specialist physicians' satisfaction with interphysician communication and to identify the major problems in the current referral process.DESIGN: Surveys were mailed to providers to determine satisfaction with the referral process; then patient-specific surveys were e-mailed to this group to obtain real-time referral information.SETTING: Academic tertiary care medical center.PARTICIPANTS: Attending-level primary care physicians (PCPs) and specialists.MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The response rate for mail surveys for PCPs was 57% and for specialists was 51%. In the mail survey, 63% of PCPs and 35% of specialists were dissatisfied with the current referral process. Respondents felt that major problems with the current referral system were lack of timeliness of information and inadequate referral letter content. Information considered important by recipient groups was often not included in letters that were sent. The response rate for the referral specific e-mail surveys was 56% for PCPs and 53% for specialists. In this e-mail survey, 68% of specialists reported that they received no information from the PCP prior to specific referral visits, and 38% of these said that this information would have been helpful. In addition, four weeks after specific referral visits, 25% of PCPs had still not received any information from specialists.CONCLUSIONS: Substantial problems were present in the referral process. The major issues were physician dissatisfaction, lack of timeliness, and inadequate content of interphysician communication. Information obtained from the general survey and referral-specific survey was congruent. Efforts to improve the referral system could improve both physician satisfaction and quality of patient care.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract This article reports on research into the relationships that emerged between hospital-based and community-based interprofessional diabetes programs involved in inter-agency care. Using constructivist grounded theory methodology we interviewed a purposive theoretical sample of 21 clinicians and administrators from both types of programs. Emergent themes were identified through a process of constant comparative analysis. Initial boundaries were constructed based on contrasts in beliefs, practices and expertise. In response to bureaucratic and social pressures, boundaries were redefined in a way that created role uncertainty and disempowered community programs, ultimately preventing collaboration. We illustrate the dynamic and multi-dimensional nature of social and symbolic boundaries in inter-agency diabetes care and the tacit ways in which hospitals can maintain a power position at the expense of other actors in the field. As efforts continue in Canada and elsewhere to move knowledge and resources into community sectors, we highlight the importance of hospitals seeing beyond their own interests and adopting more altruistic models of inter-agency integration.
    Journal of Interprofessional Care 04/2014; · 1.48 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background: Poor coordination between levels of care plays a central role in determining the quality and cost of health care. To improve patient coordination, systematic structures, guidelines, and processes for creating, transferring, and recognizing information are needed to facilitate referral routines. Methods: Prospective observational survey of implementation of electronic medical record (EMR)-supported guidelines for surgical treatment. Results: One university clinic, two local hospitals, 31 municipalities, and three EMR vendors participated in the implementation project. Surgical referral guidelines were developed using the Delphi method; 22 surgeons and seven general practitioners (GPs) needed 109 hours to reach consensus. Based on consensus guidelines, an electronic referral service supported by a clinical decision support system, fully integrated into the GPs’ EMR, was developed. Fifty-five information technology personnel and 563 hours were needed (total cost 67,000 £) to implement a guideline supported system in the EMR for 139 GPs. Economical analyses from a hospital and societal perspective, showed that 504 (range 401–670) and 37 (range 29–49) referred patients, respectively, were needed to provide a cost-effective service. Conclusion: A considerable amount of resources were needed to reach consensus on the surgical referral guidelines. A structured approach by the Delphi method and close collaboration between IT personnel, surgeons and primary care physicians were needed to reach consensus. Keywords: hospital referrals, surgery, patient pathways, process health care assessment, electronic medical record
    Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare 09/2014;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Bei den gesundheitspolitischen Diskussionen um die Neustrukturierung des ambulanten Gesundheitssystems in Deutschland kommt den Hausärzten eine besondere Bedeutung zu. Von Interesse ist, wie das Versorgungsgeschehen von Hausärzten eingeschätzt wird. Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war, Einstellungen von Berliner Hausärzten zu einzelnen Bereichen ihres beruflichen Alltags zu erfassen.Mit 14 Hausärztinnen und 16 Hausärzten aus Berlin wurde eine qualitative Befragung durchgeführt. Die 30 niedergelassenen Kollegen wurden u.a. nach ihren Einstellungen bezüglich der Zusammenarbeit mit Spezialisten und den Vorstellungen zukünftiger Versorgungsstrukturen befragt. Die Interviews wurden durch formalisiertes Zusammenfassen, durch Strukturieren und durch Explikation im Sinne der qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse nach Mayring ausgewertet. Aus Sicht der Hausärzte wird die ambulante Zusammenarbeit durch Kenntnis des Spezialisten, durch den schnellen telefonischen Kontakt und die Möglichkeit einer kurzfristigen Terminvergabe beim Fachkollegen erleichtert. Eine digitale Vernetzung in regionalen Ärzteverbünden wird als wegweisend für zukünftige ambulante Versorgungsstrukturen betrachtet.Schnelle patientenbezogene Lösungsstrategien sind für die Entscheidung zur Zusammenarbeit mit Spezialisten von großer Bedeutung. Durch digitale Vernetzungsstrukturen lässt sich die Zusammenarbeit von Hausärzten und Spezialisten zukünftig möglicherweise verbessern.
    Medizinische Klinik 01/2004; 99(8). · 0.27 Impact Factor

Full-text (3 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014