Article

The Chronometry of Attention‐Modulated Processing and Automatic Mismatch Detection

Department of Neuroscience, Rose kennedy Center. Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Psychophysiology (Impact Factor: 3.29). 06/1992; 29(4):412 - 430. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1992.tb01714.x

ABSTRACT Event-related potentials were recorded from normal subjects in an auditory selective attention task. Targets were rare longer (170-ms) tones of a designated pitch, embedded in a sequence of 100-ms standard tones. The effects of attention-modulated processing were evident in the event-related potentials elicited by the standards. Those to relevant standards were similar for easy (1000 Hz vs. 2000 Hz) and hard (1000 Hz vs. 1030 Hz) pitch separations, and were more negative frontocentrally than those to irrelevant standards. Difference waveforms (attended minus unattended standards) revealed Nd, a negative deflection that was earlier in latency for the easy task (onset, 120 ms; peak, 250 ms) than for the hard task (onset, 250 ms; peak, 350 ms). The speed of detection of the deviant longer tones was insensitive to the attention-modulated processes indexed by Nd. Median reaction time did not differ between tasks, although there were more misses and false alarms in the hard task (and nearly all of the latter were to the irrelevant longer tones). Neither direction of attention nor task difficulty affected the latency of mismatch negativity, N2, or P3 (as identified in difference waveforms: attended or unattended longer tones). minus their respective standards). The data suggest that performance was guided by two independent but converging processes, automatic mismatch detection of the longer tone and attention-modulated processing of pitch, followed by selection of response.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
67 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Based on results showing that the “deviant-minus-standard” estimate of the mismatch negativity (MMN) amplitude increases with increasing amounts of deviance, it has been suggested that the MMN amplitude reflects the amount of difference between the neural representations of the standard and the deviant sound. However, the deviant-minus-standard waveform also includes an N1 difference. We tested the effects of the magnitude of deviance on MMN while minimizing this N1 confound. We found no significant magnitude of deviance effect on the genuine MMN amplitude. Thus we suggest that the average MMN amplitude does not reflect the difference between neural stimulus representations; rather it may index the percentage of detected deviants, each of which elicits an MMN response of uniform amplitude. These results are compatible with an explanation suggesting that MMN is involved in maintaining a neural representation of the auditory environment.
    Psychophysiology 12/2007; 45(1):60 - 69. · 3.29 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Research suggests that infants may be sensitive to the prosodic structure of their native language at an earlier age than the segmental structure. In adults, the right cerebral hemisphere is more involved than the left in processing certain types of prosodic information. A hypothesis derived from these 2 research findings is that similar right hemisphere specialization for prosodic information would be found in infants. Event‐related potentials (ERPs) recorded to tone probes superimposed on English and Italian passages (languages with different prosodic structure) and on English and Dutch passages (languages with similar prosodic structure) were used to test this hypothesis in 3‐month‐old infants (n = 24). Significant differences in ERP amplitude measures indicated that both left and right cerebral hemispheres were sensitive to differences between English and the 2 foreign languages, and that both play a role in processing speech in the early stages of language acquisition.
    Developmental Neuropsychology - DEVELOP NEUROPSYCHOL. 01/1999; 15(1):73-109.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Event-related potentials were recorded to tones that subjects ignored while reading a book of their choosing. In all conditions, 90% of the tones were 100 msec in duration and 10% of the tones were 170 msec in duration. In a control condition, a customary oddball paradigm was used in which all of the tones were identical except for the longer duration tones. In two conditions, the tones varied over a wide range of tonal frequencies from 700 to 2050 Hz in 10 steps of 150 Hz. In another condition, the tones varied over the same frequencies but also varied in intensity from about 60 to 87 dB in steps of 3 dB. Thus, there was no "standard" tone in the sense of a frequently presented tone that had identical stimulus features. A mismatch negativity (MMN) was elicited in all conditions. The data are discussed in terms of the storage of information in the memory upon which the MMN is based.
    Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 01/1995; 7(1):81-94. · 4.49 Impact Factor