Article

Psychological distress in long‐term survivors of solid tumors diagnosed in childhood: A report from the childhood cancer survivor study

Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, New York, United States
Pediatric Blood & Cancer (Impact Factor: 2.56). 07/2007; 49(1):47 - 51. DOI: 10.1002/pbc.20914

ABSTRACT PurposeTo evaluate and compare psychological distress in long-term survivors of solid tumors diagnosed in childhood and their siblings, and to identify significant correlates of psychological distress.ProcedureAdult survivors (2,778) of solid tumors diagnosed in childhood and 2,925 siblings completed a long-term follow-up questionnaire assessing symptoms associated with depression, somatization, and anxiety, as well as demographic, health, and medical information.ResultsOverall, a large majority of siblings and survivors reported few, if any, symptoms of psychological distress. In the aggregate, solid tumor cancer survivors reported significantly higher levels of global distress as measured by the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18), as well as higher levels of somatization and anxiety, when compared to siblings. However, when compared to population norms, both survivors and siblings reported lower levels of global and dimensional distress. Female gender, lower educational and income attainment, perceived poor health status and reports of current health problems all were associated with reporting psychological distress symptoms for both survivors and siblings. Among survivors, having a limb amputation was associated with reporting fewer symptoms of global and dimensional distress.Conclusion
Poor health status, low levels of income, education, and employment appear to be predictors of distress for survivors of solid tumors. Thus, interventions that promote health and facilitate educational advancement, income attainment and social interaction to minimize isolation and maximize social support may reduce psychological distress and promote quality of life for childhood cancer survivors. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;49:47–51. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

3 Followers
 · 
67 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: To describe how the quality of life (QOL) discussion in childhood medulloblastoma (MB) relates to treatment developments, survival and sequelae from 1920 to 2014. Articles containing "childhood medulloblastoma" and "quality of life" were identified in PubMed. Those containing phrases pertaining to psychological, emotional, behavioral or social adjustment in the title, abstract or keywords were selected. Inclusion of relevant older publications was assured by cross-checking references. 1920-1930s: suction, electro-surgery, kilovolt (KV) irradiation. Survival = months. Focus on operative mortality, symptoms and survival. 1940s: radiotherapy improved. 1950s: chemotherapy and intubation. Survival = years. Opinions oscillated between optimism/awareness of physical sequelae of radiotherapy. 1960s: magnified vision, ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunts, megavolt (MV) irradiation. Long-term survival shifted the attention towards neurological problems, disability and carcinogenesis of radiotherapy. 1970s: CT, microscope, bipolar coagulation, shunt filters, neuroanesthesia, chemotherapy trials and staging studies. Operative mortality decreased and many patients (re)entered school; emphasis on neuropsychological sequelae, IQ and academic performance. 1980s: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), Cavitron ultrasonic aspiration (CUSA), laser surgery, hyper-fractionated radiotherapy (HFRT). Cerebellar mutism, psychological and social issues. 1990s: pediatric neurosurgery, proton beams, stem cell rescue. Reflections on QOL as such. 21st century: molecular genetics. Premature aging, patterns of decline, risk- and resilience factors. QOL is a critical outcome measure. Focus depends on survival and sequelae, determined after years of follow-up. Detailed measurements are limited by time, money and human resources, and self-reporting questionnaires represent a crude measure limited by subjectivity. Therapeutic improvements raise the question of QOL versus cure. QOL is a potential primary research endpoint; multicenter international studies are needed, as are web-based tools that work across cultures.
    Child s Nervous System 02/2014; DOI:10.1007/s00381-014-2388-5 · 1.16 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND Serious psychological distress (SPD) is associated with adverse health outcomes such as poor quality of life and shorter survival in cancer survivors, but to the authors' knowledge, the relationship between SPD and health care use and medical expenditures is not clear.METHODSA total of 4326 cancer survivors and 57,109 noncancer participants were identified from the 2008 through 2010 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, a nationwide population-based survey, and their psychological distress was assessed with the 6-item Kessler Psychological Distress Scale (SPD defined by a score ≥13). The association between SPD and use and medical expenditures of various types of health care (office-based, outpatient, hospital inpatient, emergency department, dental, and prescriptions) was examined using a 2-part modeling approach that adjusted for demographic, personal, and comorbidity factors. The marginal effects of SPD on health care use and expenditures were calculated for cancer survivors and were compared with those of noncancer participants.RESULTSThe weighted prevalence of SPD in cancer survivors was 8.2% compared with 4.8% in the noncancer participants. SPD was significantly associated with higher use of all care types except dental care in cancer survivors. Cancer survivors with SPD spent $4431 (95% confidence interval, $3419-$5443) more than survivors without SPD on medical services each year, whereas this extra expenditure associated with SPD for participants without cancer was $2685 (95% confidence interval, $2099-$3271).CONCLUSIONS In a national representative sample of cancer survivors, SPD was found to be associated with higher health care use and medical expenditures. Distress screening and psychosocial care in cancer survivors may help reduce the economic burden of cancer in the United States. Cancer 2014. © 2014 American Cancer Society.
    Cancer 10/2014; 121(4). DOI:10.1002/cncr.29102 · 4.90 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Objectives. To assess the prevalence of psychosocial distress (depression, anxiety, somatization, and perceived stress) in a consecutive sample of patients presenting with voice concerns and to qualitatively analyze patient comments on challenges associated with voice problems. Study Design. Cross-sectional study. Methods. New patients presenting to a multidisciplinary voice clinic with voice concerns were invited to participate. Respondents (n = 197) completed the Brief Symptom Inventory 18-item scale, the 4-item Perceived Stress Scale, and the Voice Handicap Index 10-item scale. Qualitative analysis was performed of responses to an open-ended question about challenges associated with a voice problem. Results. Approximately one-third (32%) of the patients met the strict case criteria for depression, anxiety, and/or somatic concerns based on the Brief Symptom Inventory 18-item scale. Most patients had no prior diagnosis of depression or anxiety, and the degree of distress was not predicted by the type of voice-related diagnosis. Perceived stress was higher among female patients (P = 0.02). As expected, scores on the Voice Handicap Index 10-item scale were indicative of concurrent voice-related handicap (mean, 19.5; standard deviation, 9.4). In qualitative analysis of responses regarding challenges associated with a voice problem, 19 themes were identified (eg, threat to occupational functioning). Conclusions. These findings identify a high prevalence of multiple types of distress among patients with voice disorders, presenting an opportunity to provide more comprehensive care to this patient population.
    Journal of voice: official journal of the Voice Foundation 06/2014; 28(6). DOI:10.1016/j.jvoice.2014.02.010 · 0.94 Impact Factor