Evidence for spontaneous immunosuppression in autoimmune hepatitis

I. Department of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg-University
Hepatology (Impact Factor: 11.06). 08/1995; 22(2):381 - 388. DOI: 10.1002/hep.1840220202


Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) runs a variable clinical course. Slow disease progression or even spontaneous remissions can be observed and suggest that the autoimmune process can, at least to a certain extent, be controlled by regulatory elements of the patient's own immune system. In experimental autoimmune hepatitis (EAH) spontaneous recovery is regularly observed and associated with antigen-specific and antigen-nonspecific suppression. The aim of the current study was to search for similar immunoregulatory phenomena in patients with AIH. We examined T-cell reactivity to soluble human liver antigens in 11 patients with active autoimmune hepatitis and 30 patients with other liver diseases (chronic viral hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, fatty liver). T-cell reactivity to liver antigens was almost exclusively confined to the AIH patients. In 9 of these 11 patients we were able to compare the T-cell response in active untreated disease, directly after initiation of immunosuppressive therapy and in remission, at which point T-cell reactivity was found to be markedly reduced. Addition of irradiated peripheral blood cells from the active disease phase or the remission phase to the responding cells taken before treatment showed that in eight of the nine patients there was marked suppression of the liver-specific T-cell response by cells from the remission phase. Study of the in vivo immune responsiveness by giving a tetanus toxoid booster immunization to nine patients with active untreated AIH as well as healthy controls and patients with other liver diseases showed that none of the patients with AIH showed a response to the tetanus immunization, whereas almost all the other patients showed marked responses. Taken together these results show the presence of active suppression of T-cell autoreactivity in vitro in AIH and marked nonresponsiveness to in vivo challenge with an unrelated antigen, suggesting generalized spontaneous immunosuppression that is more pronounced in vivo than what can be measured in vitro. Spontaneous immunosuppression, however, is not sufficient to effectively suppress the disease process. Immunosuppressive therapy is required for remission induction, but is apparently helped by the patient's own immunoregulatory activity. These observations support the concept of peripheral control mechanisms being operative in patients with AIH, and these could be the basis for a more effective and specific immunotherapy of this condition in the future. (Hepatology 1995;22:381–388.)

10 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) is a distinct form of acute and chronic inflammatory liver disease in which immune reactions against host antigens are found to be the major pathological mechanism. If left untreated it carries an unfavourable prognosis, and the diagnosis should be made as soon as possible. The diagnostic approach has been greatly facilitated by the establishment of a panel of marker autoantibodies, which do not define distinct therapeutic groups of AIH, but do allow a subgrouping based on differences in patient populations, some clinical features and prognosis. The characterization of organ-specific components of the liver cell surface as targets of cellular and humoral autoimmune reactions give new insights into the pathogenesis of the disease, even though the primary event triggering the disease remains to be defined. The most important diseasepromoting factor seems to be a genetically determined background for autoimmunity. Without this different environmental factors, including viruses, toxins, cytokines and drugs, are only able to induce transient autoimmune phenomena and not autoimmune disease. The histopathology of AIH is in keeping with the present pathogenetic concept. Although there is no pathognomonic feature distinguishing this type of hepatitis from virus-induced forms, some distinct morphological lesions are regarded as characteristic. Clinical research on AIH has benefited greatly from observations of experimental AIH in mice. Recognition of the critical role of autoreactive T-lymphocytes in the pathogenesis and the observation of spontaneous recovery from AIH in the animal model associated with antigen-specific and antigen-non-specific T-cell suppression have made basic contributions to our improved understanding of the natural course of AIH in humans.
    Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin 08/1996; 429(1):1-12. DOI:10.1007/BF00196814 · 2.65 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Transforming growth factor-beta1 (TGF-beta1) is considered the most important mediator of hepatic fibrogenesis. At the same time, TGF-beta1 is an immunosuppressive cytokine. Development of fibrosis, often rapid, is a characteristic of autoimmune hepatitis, as is spontaneous systemic immunosuppression. The aim of our study was therefore to define the role of TGF-beta1 in autoimmune hepatitis. Using the MV 1Lu bioassay, we found markedly elevated serum levels of TGF-beta1 (median 109 ng/ml) in active autoimmune hepatitis, which normalised when patients reached biochemical remission following immunosuppressive therapy (median 34 ng/ml; p=0.0001 compared to active disease). With a newly established ELISPOT-assay for TGF-beta1-producing cells, we could exclude an increase in TGF-beta1-producing peripheral blood cells as a source of the elevated TGF-beta1. However, by in situ hybridisation and immunohistochemistry, we found strong TGF-beta1 expression in the inflamed liver. In addition to non-parenchymal and infiltrating cells, many hepatocytes showed strong staining for TGF-beta1. TGF-beta1 expression in the liver normalised in remission, yet was still somewhat increased in patients with biochemical remission but remaining histological disease activity. These results suggest that TGF-beta1 is an important mediator in active autoimmune hepatitis. They support the theory that immunosuppressive therapy needs to be guided by histology, as prevention of the development of cirrhosis presumably requires near complete suppression of TGF-beta1 in the liver; this is only found when there is no longer any histological evidence of inflammation.
    Journal of Hepatology 06/1998; 28(5):803-11. DOI:10.1016/S0168-8278(98)80230-4 · 11.34 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Classification of autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) into different subgroups according to autoantibody status has been proposed: type I (ANA/SMA), type II (LKM-1) and type III (anti-SLA). However, whether type III AIH forms a clinically distinct disease entity remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the subclassification of AIH into ANA/SMA and anti-SLA positive patients with regard to clinical, biochemical and histologic differences. Ninety-seven consecutive patients with a well-documented long-term course of AIH with ANA/SMA and/or anti-SLA autoantibodies were studied. Clinical, biochemical and histological features of patients with ANA/SMA and/or anti-SLA autoantibodies were compared in a secondary analysis of data acquired prospectively. Anti-SLA autoantibodies were found in 21.6% of patients. Anti-SLA-positive patients tended to have lower transaminases (mean: 153 vs. 247 IU/l), gamma-globulins (25 vs. 31%) and bilirubin (1.8 vs. 3.3 mg/dl) in comparison to ANA/SMA positive patients, but there was a large overlap. HLA-type A1 B8 was more frequent in anti-SLA positive patients, while there was no difference in HLA DR3 and DR4 allotype. Response to immunosuppressive therapy was excellent, but relapse occurred frequently. Diagnosis of anti-SLA positive AIH was often delayed (mean: 68 months from first elevation of transaminases) since testing for anti-SLA autoantibodies is currently not generally available. ANA/SMA and anti-SLA positive patients share most clinical, biochemical, histologic and prognostic features. Distinction between type I and type III AIH is therefore clinically not helpful. However, testing for anti-SLA autoantibodies helps in the diagnosis of AIH in many patients who may otherwise be misdiagnosed.
    Journal of Hepatology 11/1999; 31(4):635-40. DOI:10.1016/S0168-8278(99)80342-0 · 11.34 Impact Factor
Show more