Article

Surface modification and physical properties of various UHMWPE‐fiber‐reinforced modified epoxy composites

Department of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 106
Journal of Applied Polymer Science (Impact Factor: 1.64). 04/2007; 104(1):655 - 665. DOI: 10.1002/app.25735

ABSTRACT Two surface modification methods—plasma surface treatment and chemical agent treatment—were used to investigate their effects on the surface properties of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fibers. In the analyses, performed using electron spectroscopy for chemical analysis, changes in weight, and scanning electron microscope observations, demonstrated that the two fiber-surface-modified composites formed between UHMWPE fiber and epoxy matrix exhibited improved interfacial adhesion and slight improvements in tensile strengths, but notable decreases in elongation, relative to those properties of the composites reinforced with the untreated UHMWPE fibers. In addition, three kinds of epoxy resins—neat DGEBA, polyurethane-crosslinked DGEBA, and BHHBP-DGEBA—were used as resin matrices to examine the tensile and elongation properties of their UHMWPE fiber-reinforced composites. From stress/strain measurements and scanning electron microscope observations, the resin matrix improved the tensile strength apparently, but did not affect the elongation. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci 104: 655–665, 2007

0 Followers
 · 
235 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: UHMWPE fibers have widely application, but the poor adhesion to polymer matrix limit its development. Polymerization of vapor phase pyrrole on UHMWPE fibers was introduced in this paper for improve the adhesion between UHMWPE fibers and epoxy. The Ppy-coated UHMWPE fiber was studied by SEM, FTIR, DSC and pullout test, respectively. The result showed that there is no chemical act between UHMWPE fiber and polypyrrole. The Ppy coatings have strong effect on the morphological and adhesion property of UHMWPE fiber. The most important, the maximum pullout force was improved after pyrrole polymerization on the surface of UHMWPE fiber.
    12/2010; 168-170:1695-1699. DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.168-170.1695
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Polyester fabrics have been treated with plasma to increase polypyrrole/PW12O403- (hybrid material) adhesion to its surface. With the plasma treatment, the roughness of the fibers increases as it has been observed by means of atomic force microscopy (AFM). Polar functional groups are also created on the surface of polyester fabrics as X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) measurements have shown. These polar groups contribute to the adhesion of polypyrrole to the fibers. Coatings obtained on plasma treated fabrics were more resistant to washing and rubbing fastness tests. The use of an inorganic counter ion (PW12O) that contains an element with a high atomic number (W) helps to locate zones where the coating is missed; this is achieved by means of micrographs obtained by backscattered electrons (BSE). The electrical resistance of the fabrics was also measured by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), obtaining also better results with the plasma treated fabrics. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2013
    Journal of Applied Polymer Science 07/2013; 129(1). DOI:10.1002/app.38652 · 1.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The two deposition polymerization techniques, i.e. vapor phase and liquid phase pyrrole deposition polymerization were applied to Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) fiber in this paper. The effect of deposition technique on the surface morphology, mechanical properties, electrical stability and surface roughness of fibers were discussed. The result showed that deposition technique has a strong effect on the properties of UHMWPE fibers. Fibers treated by vapor phase deposition polymerization has much fine and small granular structure, lower resistance, better mechanical property and higher surface roughness value.
    02/2012; 476-478:1374-1378. DOI:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.476-478.1374

Preview

Download
6 Downloads
Available from