Extreme properties of GRB 061007: a highly energetic or a highly collimated burst?

Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Denver, Denver, Colorado, United States
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (Impact Factor: 5.11). 09/2007; 380(3):1041 - 1052. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12138.x


ABSTRACTGRB 061007 was the brightest gamma-ray burst (GRB) to be detected by Swift and was accompanied by an exceptionally luminous afterglow that had a V-band magnitude <11.1 at 80 s after the prompt emission. From the start of the Swift observations the afterglow decayed as a power law with a slope of αX= 1.66 ± 0.01 in the X-ray and αopt= 1.64 ± 0.01 in the UV/optical, up to the point that it was no longer detected above background in the optical or X-ray bands. The brightness of this GRB and the similarity in the decay rate of the X-ray, optical and γ-ray emission from 100 s after the trigger distinguish this burst from others and present a challenge to the fireball model. The lack of a cooling or jet break in the afterglow up to ∼105 s constrains any model that can produce the large luminosity observed in GRB 061007, which we found to require either an excessively large kinetic energy or highly collimated outflow. Analysis of the multiwavelength spectral and high-resolution temporal data taken with Swift suggests an early time jet break to be a more plausible scenario than a highly energetic GRB. This must have occurred within 80 s of the prompt emission, which places an upper limit on the jet opening angle of θj= 0.8°. Such a highly collimated outflow resolves the energy budget problem presented in a spherical emission model, reducing the isotropic-equivalent energy of this burst to Ecorrγ= 1050 erg, consistent with other GRBs.

Download full-text


Available from: Alice A. Breeveld, Dec 17, 2013
35 Reads
  • Source
    • "Reaching a peak magnitude < 11 (similar to 9th magnitude of GRB 990123), both the X-ray and optical lightcurves show single power law decaying behavior from the very beginning (∼ 80 s after the trigger). This suggests a strong external forward shock emission with enormous kinetic energy (Mundell et al. 2006) or a structured jet with very early jet break (Schady et al. 2006b). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Extended, fading emissions in multi-wavelength are observed following gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). Recent broad-band observational campaigns led by the Swift Observatory reveal rich features of these GRB afterglows. Here we review the latest observational progress and discuss the theoretical implications for understanding the central engine, composition, and geometric configuration of GRB jets, as well as their interactions with the ambient medium.
    Advances in Space Research 11/2006; 40(8-40):1186-1198. DOI:10.1016/j.asr.2007.01.016 · 1.36 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Since the successful launch of NASA's dedicated gamma-ray burst (GRB) mission, Swift, the study of cosmological GRBs has entered a new era. Here I review the rapid observational and theoretical progress in this dynamical research field during the first two-year of the Swift mission, focusing on how observational breakthroughs have revolutionized our understanding of the physical origins of GRBs. Besides summarizing how Swift helps to solve some pre-Swift mysteries, I also list some outstanding problems raised by the Swift observations. An outlook of GRB science in the future, especially in the GLAST era, is briefly discussed. Comment: Invited review for Chinese Journal of Astronomy & Astrophysics, 60 pages, to appear in 2007, ChJAA, 7, 1-50
    Chinese Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics 01/2007; 7(1). DOI:10.1088/1009-9271/7/1/01 · 0.85 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The early, highly time-variable X-ray emission immediately following GRBs exhibits strong spectral variations that are unlike the temporally smoother emission which dominates after $t\sim 10^3$ s. The ratio of hard channel (1.3-10.0 keV) to soft channel (0.3-1.3 keV) counts in the Swift X-ray telescope provides a new measure delineating the end time of this emission. We define $T_{H}$ as the time at which this transition takes place and measure for 59 events a range of transition times that span $10^2$ s to $10^{4}$ s, on average 5 times longer than the prompt $T_{90}$ duration observed in the Gamma-ray band. It is very likely that the mysterious light curve plateau phase and the later powerlaw temporal evolution, both of which typically occur at times greater than $T_{H}$ and hence exhibit very little hardness ratio evolution, are both produced by external shocking of the surrounding medium and not by the internal shocks thought responsible for the earlier emission. We use the apparent lack of spectral evolution to discriminate against proposed models for the plateau phase emission. We favor energy injection scenarios with a roughly linearly increasing input energy versus time for six well sampled events with nearly flat light curves at $t\approx 10^3-10^4$s. Also, using the transition time $T_{H}$ as the delineation between the GRB and afterglow emission, we calculate that the kinetic energy in the afterglow shock is typically a factor of 10 lower than that released in the GRB. Lack of hardness variations in these three events may be due to a very highly relatavistic outflow or due to a very dense circumburst medium. There are a handful of rare cases of very late time $t>10^4$s hardness evolution, which may point to residual central engine activity at very late time. Comment: 18 pages, 8 figures, 1 table, includes material removed from astro-ph/0612564 v1, Accepted to ApJ
    The Astrophysical Journal 02/2007; 668(1). DOI:10.1086/521072 · 5.99 Impact Factor
Show more