Personal fables, narcissism, and adolescent adjustment

Psychology in the Schools (Impact Factor: 0.72). 03/2006; 43(4):481 - 491. DOI:10.1002/pits.20162

ABSTRACT The relationship among three personal fables (omnipotence, invulnerability, personal uniqueness), narcissism, and mental health variables was assessed in a large, cross-sectional sample of adolescents drawn from Grades 6 (n = 94), 8 (n = 223), 10 (n = 142), and 12 (n = 102). Participants responded to the New Personal Fable Scale, the Narcissistic Personality Inventory, the Children's Depression Inventory, three indices of suicidal ideation, an inventory of delinquent risk behaviors, the Global Self-Worth scales from the Self-Perception Profiles for Children and for Adolescents, and two subscales from the Self-Image Questionnaire for Young Adolescents. The results showed that omnipotence and narcissism strongly counterindicated internalizing symptomatology, and were robust predictors of positive mental health and adjustment. Invulnerability was strongly associated with risk behaviors. Personal uniqueness was strongly associated with depression and suicidal ideation, a relationship that increased with age. Hence, personal fable ideation is a multidimensional construct with differential implications for adolescent mental health. Adolescent fables of invulnerability and personal uniqueness are risk factors for externalizing and internalizing symptoms, respectively, while “narcissistic omnipotence” is associated with competence. Implications for theory, practice, and future research are discussed. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Psychol Schs 43: 481–491, 2006.

0 0
1 Bookmark
  • [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The relationship between subjective invulnerability and optimism bias in risk appraisal, and their comparative association with indices of risk activity, substance use and college adjustment problems was assessed in a sample of 350 (M (age) = 20.17; 73% female; 93% White/European American) emerging adults. Subjective invulnerability was measured with the newly devised adolescent invulnerability scale (AIS). Optimism bias in decision-making was assessed with a standard comparative-conditional risk appraisal task. Results showed that the danger- and psychological invulnerability subscales of the AIS demonstrated strong internal consistency and evidence of predictive validity. Subjective invulnerability and optimism bias were also shown to be empirically distinct constructs with differential ability to predict risk and adjustment. Danger invulnerability and psychological invulnerability were more pervasively associated with risk behavior than was optimism bias; and psychological invulnerability counter-indicated depression, self-esteem and interpersonal problems. Results support recent claims regarding the "two faces" of adolescent invulnerability. Implications for future research are drawn.
    Journal of Youth and Adolescence 08/2010; 39(8):847-57. · 2.72 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [show abstract] [hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The concept of invulnerability is explored from the perspective of nursing, medicine, psychology, sociology,public health, and education. Walker and Avant’s framework for concept analysis will be used. Definitions of theconcept are presented along with related terms. Antecedents, attributes, and consequences of the concept arediscussed in detail. Model, borderline, related, and contrary cases are presented to provide a rich representationof the concept. Empirical referents and implications for nursing are presented.
    Global Journal of Health Science. 01/2010;
  • Source

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
Nov 18, 2013