Article

Testing sequential quantum measurements: how can maximal knowledge be extracted?

Dipartimento di Fisica, Sapienza Università di Roma, Roma 00185, Italy.
Scientific Reports (Impact Factor: 5.08). 06/2012; 2:443. DOI: 10.1038/srep00443
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT The extraction of information from a quantum system unavoidably implies a modification of the measured system itself. In this framework partial measurements can be carried out in order to extract only a portion of the information encoded in a quantum system, at the cost of inducing a limited amount of disturbance. Here we analyze experimentally the dynamics of sequential partial measurements carried out on a quantum system, focusing on the trade-off between the maximal information extractable and the disturbance. In particular we implement two sequential measurements observing that, by exploiting an adaptive strategy, is possible to find an optimal trade-off between the two quantities.

0 Followers
 · 
94 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In quantum mechanics, observing is not a passive act. Consider a system of two quantum particles A and B: if a measurement apparatus M is used to make an observation on B, the overall state of the system AB will typically be altered. When this happens, no matter which local measurement is performed, the two objects A and B are revealed to possess peculiar correlations known as quantum discord. Here, we demonstrate experimentally that the very act of local observation gives rise to an activation protocol which converts discord into distillable entanglement, a stronger and more useful form of quantum correlations, between the apparatus M and the composite system AB. We adopt a flexible two-photon setup to realize a three-qubit system (A, B, M) with programmable degrees of initial correlations, measurement interaction, and characterization processes. Our experiment demonstrates the fundamental mechanism underpinning the ubiquitous act of observing the quantum world and establishes the potential of discord in entanglement generation.
    Physical Review Letters 04/2014; 112(14):140501. DOI:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.140501 · 7.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We propose a measurement-based method to produce a maximally-entangled state from a partially-entangled pure state. Our goal can be thought of as entanglement distillation from a single copy of a partially-entangled state. The present approach involves local two-outcome weak measurements. We show that application of these local weak measurements leads to a probabilistic amplification of entanglement. In addition, we examine how the probability to find the maximally-entangled state is related to the entanglement of the input state. We also study the application of our method to a mixed initial state. We show that the protocol is successful if the separable part of the mixed initial state fulfils certain conditions.
    Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical 01/2012; 45(41). DOI:10.1088/1751-8113/45/41/415303 · 1.69 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We study the procedure for sequential unambiguous state discrimination. A qubit is prepared in one of two possible states, and measured by two observers Bob and Charlie in order. A necessary condition for the state to be unambiguous discriminated by Charlie is the absence of entanglement between the principle qubit and Bob's auxiliary system. In general, this procedure for both Bob and Charlie to conclusive recognize between two nonorthogonal states relies on the availability of quantum discord which is precisely the quantum dissonance when the entanglement is absent. In the state in Bob's measurement, the left discord is positive correlated with the information extracted by Bob, and the right discord enhances the information leave to Charlie Their product achieves its maximum when occurs the optimal probability for both Bob and Charlie to identify the state.
    Physical Review A 07/2013; 88(5). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevA.88.052331 · 2.99 Impact Factor