Comparison of bacteria and fungus-binding mesh, foam and gauze as fillers in negative pressure wound therapy - pressure transduction, wound edge contraction, microvascular blood flow and fluid retention
M Malmsjö, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden R Ingemansson, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden S Lindstedt, MD, PhD, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lund University, Lund, Sweden L Gustafsson, MD, PhD, Department of Ophthalmology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Bacteria- and fungus-binding mesh binds and inactivates bacteria and fungus, which makes it interesting, alternative, wound filler for negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT). This study was conducted to compare the performance of pathogen-binding mesh, foam and gauze as wound fillers in NPWT with regard to pressure transduction, fluid retention, wound contraction and microvascular blood flow. Wounds on the backs of 16 pigs were filled with pathogen-binding mesh, foam or gauze and treated with NPWT. The immediate effects of 0, -40, -60, -80 and -120 mmHg, on pressure transduction and blood flow were examined in eight pigs using laser Doppler velocimetry. Wound contraction and fluid retention were studied during 72 hours of NPWT at -80 and -120 mmHg in the other eight pigs. Pathogen-binding mesh, gauze and foam provide similar pressure transduction to the wound bed during NPWT. Blood flow was found to decrease 0·5 cm laterally from the wound edge and increase 2·5 cm from the wound edge, but was unaltered 5·0 cm from the wound edge. The increase in blood flow was similar with all wound fillers. The decrease in blood flow was more pronounced with foam than with gauze and pathogen-binding mesh. Similarly, wound contraction was more pronounced with foam, than with gauze and pathogen-binding mesh. Wound fluid retention was the same in foam and pathogen-binding mesh, while more fluid was retained in the wound when using gauze. The blood flow 0·5-5 cm from the wound edge and the contraction of the wound during NPWT were similar when using pathogen-binding mesh and gauze. Wound fluid was efficiently removed through the pathogen-binding mesh, which may explain previous findings that granulation tissue formation is more rapid under pathogen-binding mesh than under gauze. This, in combination with its pathogen-binding properties, makes this mesh an interesting wound filler for use in NPWT.
[Show abstract][Hide abstract] ABSTRACT: Unlike common antimicrobial dressings, the Cutimed Sorbact range does not kill pathogens, but instead binds them to its surface, so they can be safely removed at dressing change. As a result, it can be used long term with minimal risk of side effects. This supplement describes the evidence base on the efficacy of DACC technology.
Journal of Wound Care 05/2015; 24(Sup5a):S3-S5. DOI:10.12968/jowc.2015.24.Sup5a.S3 · 1.07 Impact Factor
Note: This list is based on the publications in our database and might not be exhaustive.
Data provided are for informational purposes only. Although carefully collected, accuracy cannot be guaranteed. The impact factor represents a rough estimation of the journal's impact factor and does not reflect the actual current impact factor. Publisher conditions are provided by RoMEO. Differing provisions from the publisher's actual policy or licence agreement may be applicable.