Article

Lung ventilation in salamanders and the evolution of vertebrate air‐breathing mechanisms

Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (Impact Factor: 2.54). 05/1993; 49(2):163 - 183. DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8312.1993.tb00896.x

ABSTRACT Functional analysis of lung ventilation in salamanders combined with historical analysis of respiratory pumps provides new perspectives on the evolution of breathing mechanisms in vertebrates. Lung ventilation in the aquatic salamander Necturus maculosus was examined by means of cineradiography, measurement of buccal and pleuroperitoneal cavity pressures, and electromyography of hypaxial musculature. In deoxygenated water Necturus periodically rises to the surface, opens its mouth, expands its buccal cavity to draw in fresh air, exhales air from the lungs, closes its mouth, and then compresses its buccal cavity and pumps air into the lungs. Thus Necturus produces only two buccal movements per breath: one expansion and one compression. Necturus shares the use of this two-stroke buccal pump with lungfishes, frogs and other salamanders. The ubiquitous use of this system by basal sarcopterygians is evidence that a two-stroke buccal pump is the primitive lung ventilation mechanism for sarcopterygian vertebrates. In contrast, basal actinopterygian fishes use a four-stroke buccal pump. In these fishes the buccal cavity expands to fill with expired air, compresses to expel the pulmonary air, expands to fill with fresh air, and then compresses for a second time to pump air into the lungs. Whether the sarcopterygian two-stroke buccal pump and the actinopterygian four-stroke buccal pump arose independently, whether both are derived from a single, primitive osteichthyian breathing mechanism, or whether one might be the primitive pattern and the other derived, cannot be determined.Although Necturus and lungfishes both use a two-stroke buccal pump, they differ in their expiration mechanics. Unlike a lungfish (Protopterus), Necturus exhales by contracting a portion of its hypaxial trunk musculature (the m. Iransversus abdominis) to increase pleuroperitoneal pressure. The occurrence of this same expiratory mechanism in amniotes is evidence that the use of hypaxial musculature for expiration, but not for inspiration, is a primitive tetrapod feature. From this observation we hypothesize that aspiration breathing may have evolved in two stages: initially, from pure buccal pumping to the use of trunk musculature for exhalation but not for inspiration (as in Necturus); and secondarily, to the use of trunk musculature for both exhalation and inhalation by costal aspiration (as in amniotes).

0 Followers
 · 
122 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The neural control of inspiratory muscles can be assessed in human subjects by measurement of the behavior of populations of single motor unit from the various inspiratory muscles. The discharge frequencies and patterns of firing of the motor units directly reflect the output of the motoneurons that innervate them. With the use of these methods, our work has revealed several features of the way the output of different inspiratory motoneuron pools are controlled. The output of inspiratory motoneurons is nonuniform across pools during quiet breathing and this coordinates the contraction of all the different muscles. This output is geared to the mechanical advantage of the muscles that they innervate. For the intercostal muscles, there is recruitment of the motor units by a principle of neuromechanical matching in which neural drive is higher in the muscles with the greatest mechanical advantage for inspiration, presumably to minimize the metabolic cost of ventilation. We summarize some evidence that this principle is likely to be organized at the spinal cord, although the exact underlying mechanisms are not known. The specific differences in the output from motoneurones innervating parasternal intercostal and diaphragm muscles during trunk rotation suggest that the output of inspiratory motoneurones engaged in a nonrespiratory voluntary task involve integration of corticospinal and bulbospinal drives at the spinal cord. An evolutionary argument is presented to support the importance of a role for spinal integration in ventilatory control.
    Progress in brain research 01/2014; 209:295-308. DOI:10.1016/B978-0-444-63274-6.00015-1 · 5.10 Impact Factor
  • Source
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studying vascular anatomy, especially in the context of relationships with hard tissues, is of great interest to biologists. Vascular studies have provided significant insight into physiology, function, phylogenetic relationships, and evolutionary patterns. Injection of resin or latex into the vascular system has been a standard technique for decades. There has been a recent surge in popularity of more modern methods, especially radiopaque latex vascular injection followed by CT scanning and digital "dissection." This technique best displays both blood vessels and bone, and allows injections to be performed on cadaveric specimens. Vascular injection is risky, however, because it is not a standardizable technique, as each specimen is variable with regard to injection pressure and timing. Moreover, it is not possible to view the perfusion of injection medium throughout the vascular system of interest. Both data and rare specimens can therefore be lost due to poor or excessive perfusion. Here, we use biplanar video fluoroscopy as a technique to guide craniovascular radiopaque latex injection. Cadaveric domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domestica) and white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus) were injected with radiopaque latex under guidance of fluoroscopy. This method was found to enable adjustments, in real-time, to the rate, location, and pressure at which latex is injected in order to avoid data and specimen loss. In addition to visualizing the injection process, this technique can be used to determine flow patterns, and has facilitated the development of consistent markers for complete perfusion.
    PLoS ONE 05/2014; 9(5):e97940. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0097940 · 3.53 Impact Factor