Article

Conspecific Attraction and the Conservation of Territorial Songbirds

Department of Animal Biology, University of Illinois, 61820, Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, IL; U.S.A; Program in Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 61820, Champaign, IL; U.S.A
Conservation Biology (Impact Factor: 4.36). 03/2004; 18(2):519 - 525. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00494.x

ABSTRACT  Conspecific attraction, the tendency for individuals of a species to settle near one another, is well described in colonial species, especially birds. Although this behavior may occur in territorial birds, evidence has been lacking. If territorial birds do exhibit this behavior, it would have major conservation implications. Birds could potentially be attracted to specific sites with artificial stimuli, making conservation of those species more efficient. In 2001 and 2002, we tested whether conspecific attraction occurs in an endangered, territorial songbird, the Black-capped Vireo (Vireo atricapilla) by playing vireo vocalizations in unoccupied habitats at Fort Hood, Texas. We were successful in attracting 73 birds to five experimental sites in 2001 and 75 birds to seven experimental sites in 2002. No birds settled on comparable control sites. Many birds attracted to the vocalizations paired and bred. At most research sites the primary threat to the species, the brood-parasitic Brown-headed Cowbird (Molothrus ater), was controlled, allowing vireos to achieve high nesting success relative to a nearby, unmanipulated population. Second-year birds were more responsive to conspecific vocalizations than older birds, as they were more common on experimental sites than in the established population. In 2002 birds recolonized experimental sites from 2001 where vocalizations were not played in 2002, indicating that 1 year of playbacks may be sufficient to establish a population. Our results provide the first experimental evidence that territorial songbirds use the presence of conspecifics when deciding where to settle and suggest that conspecific attraction may provide a valuable conservation tool.Resumen: La atracción conespecífica, tendencia de los individuos de una especie a establecerse cerca de otro de la misma especie, está bien descrita en especies coloniales, especialmente aves. Aunque este comportamiento puede ocurrir en aves territoriales, se carece de evidencia. Si aves territoriales muestran este comportamiento, tendría implicaciones mayores en la conservación. Las aves potencialmente serían atraídas a sitios específicos mediante estímulos artificiales, haciendo más eficiente la conservación de esas especies. En 2001 y 2002, probamos si ocurre la atracción conespecífica en una especie de ave canora territorial, en peligro, Vireo atricapilla, con la reproducción de vocalizaciones de vireo en hábitats desocupados en Fort Hood, Texas. Tuvimos éxito al atraer a 73 aves a cinco sitios experimentales en 2001 y 75 aves a siete sitios experimentales en 2002. No se establecieron aves en sitios controles comparables. Muchas de las aves atraídas a las vocalizaciones formaron pareja y se reprodujeron. En la mayoría de los sitios, la principal amenaza para la especie, el parásito Molothrus ater, fue controlada, lo que permitió un elevado éxito de anidación a los vireos en comparación con una población no manipulada cercana. Las aves de dos años tuvieron mayor respuesta a las vocalizaciones conespecíficas que las aves más viejas, porque fueron más comunes en los sitios experimentales que en la población establecida. En 2002 aves recolonizaron sitios experimentales de 2001 en los que no se reprodujeron vocalizaciones en 2002, lo que indica que 1 año de repetición de vocalizaciones puede ser suficiente para establecer una población. Nuestros resultados proporcionan las primeras pruebas experimentales de que aves canoras territoriales utilizan la presencia de conespecíficos al decidir donde se establecen y sugieren que la atracción conespecífica puede ser una valiosa herramienta de conservación.

1 Bookmark
 · 
307 Views
  • Source
    New Zealand Journal of Ecology 01/2013; 37:240-245. · 1.82 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We tested whether conspecific attraction can be more efficient than food bait for the detection and capture of an invasive, social species, the Norway rat Rattus norvegicus. We compared trapping rates between male and female laboratory rats and food baited controls at four mainland sites with low rat population densities, three recreational sites (Zoos) with an abundance of food in the environment, and in manipulated island rat incursions. Live lures were more efficient than food baits at both the mainland and recreational sites. There were no differences between the attractiveness of lure animals based on gender either of the lure or of the captured animals. In the manipulated rat incursions, where radio collared male rats were released on a rat free island, two animals were caught with female lures, and the third lost its collar and evaded detection. In the current study we advocate that animal behavior can help inform and guide innovative tools for the control and management of invasive species. We show that laboratory rats might be efficient as lures for their wild counterparts. Furthermore, our results emphasize the need for a flexible and varied rat control toolbox. We suggest that the use of laboratory rats should be considered in future control management plans for invasive Norway rats.
    Biological Control 01/2013; 66:83-91. · 1.92 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Habitat selection is a decision-making process that birds use to select a habitat in which they live. It is crucial for individuals to make the correct choices, because their living space directly affects their fitness. When making settlement decisions, birds are faced with uncer-tainty about habitat quality. In order to reduce it, they have to acquire information, which makes their world more predictable. Acquisition and use of information about habitat quality is the central part of the habitat selection process. Individuals can acquire information about habitat quality in various ways, e.g., by using own breeding experience (personal information), or by observing behavior and decisions made by other individuals (social information). In this review I briefly described the types of social information which songbirds use to assess the habitat quality. By using unified approach, I evaluated their value and availability for individuals, concluding that simultaneous use of several types of information provide the most effective way to habitat quality assessment. Furthermore, I argued why tits (Paridae) constitute a crucial link in the chain of interspecific social information transfer within songbirds’ communication networks throughout the Holarctic and suggested that they may be considered as the keystone cue-providers. Moreover, I evaluated current lit-erature on the artificial-attraction methods and highlighted urgent research needs in context of its practical application in the conservation and management of songbirds populations.
    Springer Science Reviews. 01/2013;

Full-text

View
0 Downloads
Available from