Nosocomial Pneumonia and Oral Health

Dept. of Periodontics/Prevention/Geriatrics, University of Michigan School of Dentistry, Ann Arbor
Special Care in Dentistry 07/2005; 25(4):179 - 187. DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2005.tb01647.x
Source: PubMed

ABSTRACT This article will critically review the evidence linking pneumonia to the aspiration of microbe-laden oropharyngeal secretions and tie that to the predisposition for these processes to affect dependent, medically compromised individuals. The goal of this review is to alert the reader to the role that oral disease and oral health play in fostering and preventing, respectively, widespread and potentially fatal pulmonary disease among high-risk individuals.

Download full-text


Available from: Frank Scannapieco, Jun 21, 2015
1 Follower
  • Journal of Gerontological Nursing 11/2012; 38(11):11-9. DOI:10.3928/00989134-20121003-02 · 0.62 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: There is considerable clinical interest in the risks and benefits of offering oral water intake, in the form of water protocols, to patients with thin-liquid dysphagia. We describe the design and implementation of a water protocol for patients in a rehabilitation setting with videofluoroscopically confirmed thin-liquid aspiration. The GF Strong Water Protocol (GFSWP) is an interdisciplinary initiative, with roles and accountabilities specified for different members of the interprofessional health-care team. Rules of the water protocol specify mode of water access (independent, supervised), the implementation of any safe swallowing strategies recommended on the basis of the patient's videofluoroscopy, and procedures for evaluating and addressing oral care needs. Trial implementation of the water protocol in 15 participants showed that they remained free of adverse events, including pneumonia, over the course of an initial 14-day trial and continuing until discharge from the facility (range = 13-108 days). Seven participants were randomly assigned to a 14-day control phase in which they received standard care (without water access). Fluid intake measures taken after the oral water intake phase were increased (mean = 1,845 cc; 95% confidence interval: 1,520-2,169 cc) compared to those in the control phase (mean = 1,474 cc; 95% CI: 1,113-1,836 cc), with oral water intake measures comprising, on average, 563 cc (range = 238-888 cc) of the total post water trial fluid intake values. Fluid intake increased at least 10% of the calculated fluid requirements in 11/15 participants who received oral water access. These participants reported favorable quality-of-life outcomes, measured using the Swal-QOL. These findings support the implementation of the GFSWP, including its exclusion criteria, rules, and plans of care, for rehabilitation patients who aspirate thin liquids.
    Dysphagia 09/2011; 27(3):297-306. DOI:10.1007/s00455-011-9366-9 · 1.60 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The goal of this paper was to report the prevalence of dental care — a Healthy People 2010 objective — for nursing home residents 65 years and older, and to assess the association between receipt of dental care with other oral status and workforce measures. Data from 7,363 residents aged 65 years and older with information in the 1997 National Nursing Home Survey (NNHS) were used.Overall, 18.2% of elderly nursing home residents had received dental care in the last month. Multivariable modeling found residents were more likely to receive dental care in the past month if they lived in the Northeast (OR=3.32, 95% CI 2.51-4.39); were dentate (OR=1.46, 95% CI 1.26-1.69); had a length of stay 12 months or longer (OR=1.37, 95% CI 1.17-1.62); or resided in facilities with dental professional services (OR=2.05, 95% CI 1.60-2.62).The results showed that disparities in receipt of dental care existed by region, length of stay, dentate status, and availability of dental services in nursing homes. Additionally, current oral health surveillance measures for nursing homes may have been inadequate.
    Special Care in Dentistry 08/2007; 27(5):177 - 186. DOI:10.1111/j.1754-4505.2007.tb00343.x