Article

# Large Einstein radii: a problem for ΛCDM

Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, University of Tokyo, Kashiwa 277-8582, Japan
(Impact Factor: 5.11). 11/2008; 390(4):1647 - 1654. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13852.x
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT

The Einstein radius of a cluster provides a relatively model-independent measure of the mass density of a cluster within a projected radius of ∼150 kpc, large enough to be relatively unaffected by gas physics. We show that the observed Einstein radii of four well-studied massive clusters, for which reliable virial masses are measured, lie well beyond the predicted distribution of Einstein radii in the standard Λ cold dark matter (ΛCDM) model. Based on large samples of numerically simulated cluster-sized objects with virial masses ∼1015 M⊙, the predicted Einstein radii are only 15–25 arcsec, a factor of 2 below the observed Einstein radii of these four clusters. This is because the predicted mass profile is too shallow to exceed the critical surface density for lensing at a sizable projected radius. After carefully accounting for measurement errors as well as the biases inherent in the selection of clusters and the projection of mass measured by lensing, we find that the theoretical predictions are excluded at a 4σ significance. Since most of the free parameters of the ΛCDM model now rest on firm empirical ground, this discrepancy may point to an additional mechanism that promotes the collapse of clusters at an earlier time thereby enhancing their central mass density.

0 Followers
·
• Source
##### Article: Arc Statistics
[Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: The existence of an arc statistics problem was at the center of a strong debate in the last fifteen years. With the aim to clarify if the optical depth for giant gravitational arcs by galaxy clusters in the so called concordance model is compatible with observations, several studies were carried out which helped to significantly improve our knowledge of strong lensing clusters, unveiling their extremely complex internal structure. In particular, the abundance and the frequency of strong lensing events like gravitational arcs turned out to be a potentially very powerful tool to trace the structure formation. However, given the limited size of observational and theoretical data-sets, the power of arc statistics as a cosmological tool has been only minimally exploited so far. On the other hand, the last years were characterized by significant advancements in the field, and several cluster surveys that are ongoing or planned for the near future seem to have the potential to make arc statistics a competitive cosmological probe. Additionally, recent observations of anomalously large Einstein radii and concentrations in galaxy clusters have reinvigorated the debate on the arc statistics problem. In this paper, we review the work done so far on arc statistics, focussing on what is the lesson we learned and what is likely to improve in the next years.
Space Science Reviews 08/2013; 177(1-4). DOI:10.1007/s11214-013-9981-x · 6.28 Impact Factor
• Source
##### Article: Imprints of primordial non-Gaussianities on large-scale structure: Scale-dependent bias and abundance of virialized objects
[Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: We study the effect of primordial nongaussianity on large-scale structure, focusing upon the most massive virialized objects. Using analytic arguments and N-body simulations, we calculate the mass function and clustering of dark matter halos across a range of redshifts and levels of nongaussianity. We propose a simple fitting function for the mass function valid across the entire range of our simulations. We find pronounced effects of nongaussianity on the clustering of dark matter halos, leading to strongly scale-dependent bias. This suggests that the large-scale clustering of rare objects may provide a sensitive probe of primordial nongaussianity. We very roughly estimate that upcoming surveys can constrain nongaussianity at the level |fNL| <~ 10, competitive with forecasted constraints from the microwave background.
Physical review D: Particles and fields 11/2007; 77(12). DOI:10.1103/PhysRevD.77.123514 · 4.86 Impact Factor
• Source
##### Article: Combining Lens Distortion and Depletion to Map the Mass Distribution of A1689
[Hide abstract]
ABSTRACT: [Abridged] We derive a projected 2D mass map of the well studied galaxy cluster A1689 based on an entropy-regularized maximum-likelihood combination of the lens magnification and distortion of red background galaxies registered in deep Subaru images. The known strong lensing information is also readily incorporated in this approach, represented as a central pixel with a mean surface density close to the critical value. We also utilize the distortion measurements to locally downweight the intrinsic clustering noise, which otherwise perturbs the depletion signal. The projected mass profile continuously steepens with radius and is well fitted by the NFW model, but with a surprising large concentration c_vir=13.4^{+5.3}_{-3.3}, lying far from the predicted value of c_vir ~ 5, corresponding to the measured virial mass, M_vir=(2.1\pm 0.2)\times 10^15M_{\odot}, posing a challenge to the standard assumptions defining the LCDM model. We examine the consistency of our results with estimates derived with the standard weak lensing estimators and by comparison with the inner mass profile obtained from strong lensing. All the reconstructions tested here imply a virial mass in the range, M_vir=(1.5-2.1)\times 10^15M_{\odot}, and the combined ACS and Subaru-2D mass reconstruction yields a tight constraint on the concentration parameter, c_vir=12.7 \pm 1(stat.) \pm 2.8(systematic) (c_200 ~ 10), improving upon the statistical accuracy of our earlier 1D analysis. Importantly, our best fitting profile properly reproduces the observed Einstein radius of 45 arcsec (z_s=1), in contrast to other weak lensing work, reporting lower concentration profiles, which underestimate the observed Einstein radius. Comment: 36 pages, 20 figures, accepted for publication in ApJ. Added a discussion on the shear calibration error in Section 5.5
The Astrophysical Journal 12/2007; 684(1). DOI:10.1086/589683 · 5.99 Impact Factor