On the diffraction pattern of C $\mathsf{_{60}}$ peapods

Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology Slovak Technical University Radlinského 9 812 32 Bratislava Slovak Republic
Physics of Condensed Matter (Impact Factor: 1.46). 10/2004; 42(1):31-45. DOI: 10.1140/epjb/e2004-00355-x
Source: arXiv

ABSTRACT We present detailed calculations of the diffraction pattern of a powder of bundles of C 60 peapods. The influence of all pertinent structural parameters of the bundles on the diffraction diagram is discussed, which should lead to a better interpretation of X-ray and neutron diffraction diagrams. We illustrate our formalism for X-ray scattering experiments performed on peapod samples synthesized from 2 different technics, which present different structural parameters. We propose and test different criteria to solve the difficult problem of the filling rate determination. Copyright Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg 2004

Download full-text


Available from: Stéphane Rols, Jun 16, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: New one-dimensional (1D) hybrid nanosystems are elaborated with metalated or metal free phthalocyanine molecules encapsulated into the hollow core of single-walled carbon nanotubes. The X-ray diffraction experiments coupled to simulation allow evidencing the 1D structural organization of the molecules inside the nanotubes. The angle between the molecule ring and the nanotube axis is close to 32° as determined from our density functional theory calculations. Confined molecules display Raman spectra hardly altered with respect to the bulk phase, suggesting a rather weak interaction with the tubes. For comparison, noncovalent functionalization at the outer surface of the tube is also investigated. The vibrational properties of the molecules functionalized at the outer surface of tubes display important modifications. A significant curvature of the phthalocyanine is induced by the interaction with the tube walls, leading to change of the central atom position within the molecular ring, in good agreement with our first-principles calculations.
    The Journal of Physical Chemistry C 02/2016; 119:5203−5210. DOI:10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b00168 · 4.84 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The growth of double-walled carbon nanotubes from peapods was studied. The transformation was monitored by the decrease of fullerene Raman lines, the growth of inner tube Raman lines, and the development of X-ray diffraction patterns. A visual check of the growth process by HRTEM provided additional information. From the difference in time constants for the bleaching of fullerene Raman lines and for the growth of nanotube Raman lines, the existence of an intermediate phase was concluded that was eventually observed in X-ray diffraction and HRTEM. Time constants for the growth of large diameter inner tubes were up to a factor two larger than for small diameter inner tubes. The results fully support the fullerene coalescence growth model triggered by Stone-Wales transformations.
    Nano Letters 09/2007; 7(8):2428-34. DOI:10.1021/nl071107o · 12.94 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: 1D-confinement of polyiodides inside single-wall carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) is investigated. Structural arrangement of iodine species as a function of the SWCNT diameters is studied. Evidence for long range one dimensional ordering of the iodine species is shown by X-ray and electron diffraction experiments independently of the tube diameter. The structure of the confined polyiodides is investigated by X-ray absorption spectroscopy. The confinement influences the local arrangement of the chains. Below a critical diameter Uc of 1 nm, long linear polyiodides are evidenced leading to a weaker charge transfer than for nanotube diameter above Uc. A shortening of the polyiodides is exhibited with the increase of the nanotube diameter leading to a more efficient charge transfer. This point reflects the 1D-confinement of the polyiodides inside the nanotubes.
    Carbon 02/2013; 52:100. DOI:10.1016/j.carbon.2012.09.010 · 6.16 Impact Factor