Prey selection and diets of bluegill Lepomis macrochirus with differing population characteristics in two Nebraska natural lakes

Fisheries Management and Ecology (Impact Factor: 1.76). 01/2003; 10(1):31 - 40. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2400.2003.00323.x


Abstract  Environmental prey samples and stomach contents of bluegill Lepomis macrochirus (Rafinesque) were collected in spring and summer 2000 from two Nebraska Sandhill lakes. Watts Lake contained a low-density bluegill population, whereas Cozad Lake contained a high-density bluegill population. Bluegill diets from both lakes were compared to determine if bluegill prey preference differed between the two populations. The highest median per cent (by calories) of zooplankton in the diet was 1.3%; the remainder was macroinvertebrates. Watts Lake bluegills preferred (based on Manly's alpha) amphipods in spring and chironomids in summer. Cozad Lake bluegills did not show a strong preference (compared with Watts Lake) for any macroinvertebrates, but still utilized amphipods and chironomids during both seasons. Larger bluegills in Watts Lake preferred chironomids in summer, but Cozad Lake bluegills did not exhibit this relationship. The higher density Cozad Lake bluegill population appeared to be more opportunistic than the lower density Watts Lake population, but both preferred macroinvertebrates.

Download full-text


Available from: Craig P Paukert,

Click to see the full-text of:

Article: Prey selection and diets of bluegill Lepomis macrochirus with differing population characteristics in two Nebraska natural lakes

217.97 KB

See full-text
  • Source
    • "In contrast to northern natural lakes where adult bluegill inhabit pelagic areas and forage extensively on zooplankton (Werner et al., 1983; Werner & Hall, 1988), several studies of bluegill diet and feeding behavior in reservoirs and natural lakes in the lower Midwest and southeastern United States have found that bluegills rely primarily on littoral macroinvertebrates independent of size or population density (Schramm & Jirka, 1989; Dewey et al., 1997; Olson et al., 2003). These differences may be caused by changes in the relative profitability of benthic versus pelagic resources due to environmental differences between lakes such as in water clarity, littoral habitat, and/or nutrient levels and should be investigated further. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Recent syntheses of trophic cascade and biomanipulation research have suggested that the effects of piscivores on planktivorous fish populations are reduced, when planktivores are capable of outgrowing predator gape limitation and in systems with complex food web interactions. These hypotheses, however, have not been tested in long-term, whole-lake, experiments where processes such as fish recruitment and compensatory food web responses may be important. We conducted a replicated whole-lake experiment to test for the effects of supplemental piscivore introductions on food webs of eutrophic lakes dominated by deep-bodied planktivores. Responses to piscivore enhancement were compared between lakes differing in food web structure due to the presence of omnivorous gizzard shad (Dorosoma cepedianum). A significant decrease in the relative abundance of juvenile planktivorous fish, and an increase in total benthic macroinvertebrate density was observed in lakes containing mainly bluegills (Lepomus machrochirus). In contrast, lakes containing gizzard shad exhibited no significant responses to piscivore manipulation. Our results support the hypothesis that food webs in lakes dominated by deep-bodied planktivorous fish species respond weakly to piscivore enhancement. In addition, our findings support the hypothesis that cascading trophic interactions are weaker in lake ecosystems with more complex food web interactions such as those containing gizzard shad.
    Hydrobiologia 09/2014; 736(1). DOI:10.1007/s10750-014-1885-6 · 2.28 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "A. rupestris are crepuscular benthic feeders that forage opportunistically as they migrate in the water column preying on decapods (crayfish) and an array of benthic invertebrates such as amphipods and chironomids (Keast and Webb 1966; Johnson and Dropkin 1993; Roell and Orth 1993). L. macrochirus has been found to be a generalist feeder utilizing zooplankton, benthic invertebrates, plants and even fish as food sources (Azuma 1992; Michaletz 2006; Olson et al. 2003; Uchii et al. 2007). Such variable foraging and omnivory has been found to obscure trends between trophic position and body size (Vander Zanden et al. 2000). "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Animal body size is a driving force behind trophic interactions within biological communities, yet few studies have explored relationships between body size and trophic position (based on δ15N) at a broad-scale in freshwater lakes. Therefore, our goals were to (1) determine whether body size is a good predictor of trophic position for multiple pelagic zooplankton taxa and fish communities, and (2) examine how body size-trophic position relationships at the community level compare to species level for fish. Zooplankton and fish were collected from 12 and 7 lakes, respectively, located in the Kawarthas, southern Ontario, Canada. The results indicated that for zooplankton, significant positive but different relationships were found between body size and trophic position for cladocerans, in general, and Daphnia, but not Holopedium. For fish, at the lake community level six out of seven relationships were positive and significant, but again, different among lakes. In contrast, at the species level only three of eight species-specific relationships were significant. Furthermore, for two widespread species, Perca flavescens and Micropterus dolomieu, significant differences were found between community- and lake-specific species relationships. Our community-level models and most species-level models provide evidence that trophic interactions in freshwater lakes are size-based. These results demonstrate that general species models should be applied with caution when using body size to predict trophic position. Additionally, the predictive power of some relationships found here is questionable since, albeit significant, their strengths are generally low. Together, our results suggest that body size may have limited use in predicting trophic position of some biota in temperate freshwater lakes.
    Aquatic Sciences 06/2011; 74(1-1):203-212. DOI:10.1007/s00027-011-0212-9 · 2.71 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Prey availability was another important variable in our analyses, particularly in the adult models. Bluegills are omnivorous and are known to feed extensively on zooplankton and benthic invertebrates (Mittelbach 1981; Werner and Hall 1988; Manatunge and Asaeda 1999; Olson et al. 2003). Although they undergo stagespecific diet and habitat shifts (Mittelbach 1981), these invertebrate food items remain important throughout their ontogeny. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding how life history variation and the environment affect growth and population size structure is an important theme of fisheries ecology. However, the interactions among important biotic and abiotic factors and their relative importance in the context of population-specific variation are seldom considered. We used an information theoretic approach to investigate how environmental variables interact with important life history parameters to influence population size structure of bluegills Lepomis macrochirus. We sampled bluegill populations in 23 Illinois reservoirs to examine the effects of temperature, water transparency, and prey availability and bluegill density, harvest, and size at maturation on bluegill growth and population size structure. Good growth and large body size were associated with warm, clear lakes containing abundant prey resources. An exception to this pattern was early growth (length at age 2): Larger body size at age 2 was associated with relatively low Secchi depth (i.e., turbid water). In addition, size at maturation was positively related to size of adult male bluegills. Interestingly, bluegill density and harvest mortality—factors that are often considered important within populations—did not contribute much explanatory power to our among-system models. Whereas harvest and density-dependent growth have been shown to influence individual bluegill populations, their effects across a range of populations appear to be mitigated by temperature, water transparency, and prey availability. Although growth of individuals can be influenced by a variety of factors, our investigation suggests that fairly straightforward mechanisms at broader spatial scales are responsible for explaining variation among populations.
    Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 03/2009; 138(2):423-432. DOI:10.1577/T08-076.1 · 1.47 Impact Factor
Show more