Article

Optimism, Pessimism, and Motivation: Relations to Adjustment

Social and Personality Psychology Compass 06/2009; 3(4):494 - 506. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00190.x

ABSTRACT The present work reviews the literature examining connections involving the key constructs of optimism and pessimism with motivation and adjustment. We review historical and conceptual models of optimism and pessimism. We then examine how these central constructs have been linked to both adaptive and maladaptive motivational processes and outcomes in the empirical literature. How cultural factors may impact the function of optimism and pessimism is also discussed. We end with a brief discussion of emerging issues that would be useful to examine in future research on optimism and pessimism.

3 Followers
 · 
598 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During the past few decades, the psychological trait of optimism has garnered an increasing amount of interest from scientists, and numerous studies have now shown that optimism is associated with important benefits. The present review summarizes the main findings from this body of research. We begin by describing the two main ways in which researchers have defined and operationalized optimism, as "optimistic explanatory style" and as "dispositional optimism". Second, we provide an overview of the various studies documenting the benefits of optimism. Optimism indeed appears to be associated with higher levels of subjective well-being, better health, and more success. In addition, we describe some of the ongoing controversies in this area of research. Third, we summarize what researchers currently know about the causes of optimism, and how optimism can be fostered in adults as well as in youth. Finally, the present review highlights the adaptive nature of optimism, while recognizing that being optimistic under all circumstances may not always be best. Cultivating flexible and realistic optimism may therefore be most advantageous. We conclude by pointing out important areas of research for the future. These include continuing the search for the biological and brain substrates of optimism, and investigating the psychological and physiological benefits of adopting a flexible (as opposed to rigid) optimistic outlook on life. (C) 2012 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of Societe franc aisede psychologie.
    Pratiques Psychologiques 06/2012; 18(2):107–120. DOI:10.1016/j.prps.2012.02.002 · 0.27 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Theories of bureaucratic reputation have been largely neglected despite major contributions from Carpenter and others, and despite novel empirical results. In the aggregate, and in sync with recent developments in social networks and social cognition, this paper offers a set of ideas for developing the study of bureaucratic reputation. It suggests that scholars of bureaucratic reputation have neglected research into two sets of relationships, the realization of which may turn this approach into a widely used theory. The first is the agency-audience relationships which revolve around how and what people think about public agencies, how these thoughts translate into agency behavior, and how information regarding this behavior is transformed within multiple agencies and how it impacts upon audience memory and behavior regarding that agency. The second is the relationships between agency heads and agency reputation. The paper provides a series of predictions on how systematic variation in both of these dimensions may bear on agency choices and on agency reputation.
    SSRN Electronic Journal 10/2014; DOI:10.2139/ssrn.2466425
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper develops both the concept of policy anti-bubble and the analytical contours of its life-cycle dynamics by building on the behavioral theories of human choice and organization, as well as on robust findings in psychology, indicating that pessimism and negative affects exert a great deal of influence on decision making and risk-taking. A policy anti-bubble is a real and/or perceived policy underreaction which is propelled by self-reinforcing processes over an extended period of time. The behavioral understanding of the term advanced here points at a possible process by which different valences of affective states, situational factors, specific emotions, cultural or geographical factors, trigger the emergence of policy anti-bubbles. Self-reinforcing processes interact with the contagion of ideas and emotions to reinforce the lack of confidence in the policy, thereby leading to the undersupply of policy. This process may be interrupted following modest endogenous or exogenous perturbations, as well as following the reduction in negativity bias when the information environment becomes predominantly negative.

Preview

Download
38 Downloads
Available from