T1/T2*-weighted MRI provides clinically relevant pseudo-CT density data for the pelvic bones in MRI-only based radiotherapy treatment planning

Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Central Hospital , HUS , Finland.
Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) (Impact Factor: 3). 06/2012; 52(3). DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.692883
Source: PubMed


Background and purpose:
In radiotherapy (RT), target soft tissues are best defined on MR images. In several cases, CT imaging is needed only for dose calculation and generation of digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs). Image co-registration errors between MRI and CT can be avoided by using MRI-only based treatment planning, especially in the pelvis. Since electron density information can not be directly derived from the MRI, a method is needed to convert MRI data into CT like data. We investigated whether there is a relationship between MRI intensity and Hounsfield unit (HU) values for the pelvic bones. The aim was to generate a method to convert bone MRI intensity into HU data surrogate for RT treatment planning.

Material and methods:
The HU conversion model was generated for 10 randomly chosen prostate cancer patients and independent validation was performed in another 10 patients. Data consisted of 800 image voxels chosen within the pelvic bones in both T1/T2*-weighted gradient echo and CT images. Relation between MRI intensity and electron density was derived from calibrated HU-values. The proposed method was tested by constructing five "pseudo"-CT series.

We found that the MRI intensity is related to the HU value within a HU range from 0 to 1400 within the pelvic bones. The mean prediction error of the conversion model was 135 HU. Dose calculation based on the pseudo-CT images was accurate and the generated DRRs were of good quality.

The proposed method enables generation of clinically relevant pseudo-CT data for the pelvic bones from one MRI series. It is simpler than previously reported approaches which require either acquisition of several MRI series or T2* maps with special imaging sequences. The method can be applied with commercial clinical image processing software. The application requires segmentation of the bones in the MR images.

Download full-text


Available from: Mika Kapanen, Jul 24, 2014
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: To determine whether bones could be localized accurately by using MR images only in radiotherapy treatment planning. Furthermore, to measure absorbed dose in a material behind different parts of the bone, and to evaluate dose calculation error in a pseudo-CT image by assuming a single electron density for the bones. Methods: A dedicated phantom was constructed using fresh deer bones and gelatine. The accuracy of the bone edge location and the bone diameter in MR images were evaluated by comparing those in the images with the actual measures. The absorbed dose behind the bones was measured by a matrix detector at 6 and 15 MV. Thedose calculation error in the bulk density pseudo-CT image was quantified by comparing the calculation results with those obtained in a standard CT image by superposition and Monte Carlo algorithms (TPSs: Xio 4.60 and Monaco 3.00, Elekta CMS Software). Results: The examination of bone position revealed that the bones can be localized within a 1-mm-pixel-size in the MR images. The measured dose behind less than 2.5-cm-thick femur indicated that the absorbed dose behind the middle part of the bone is approximately one percentage unit (6 MV: 1.3%, 15 MV: 0.9%) smallerthan that of the physically narrower bone edge. The calculations illustrated that the bulk density pseudo-CT image used causes errors up to nearly 2% to the dose behind the middle part, but also, the edge of the femur. Conclusions: This research ascertains that the bone localization is not a restrictive issue for radiotherapy treatment planning by using MR imageonly. The work indicates also that the decrease in absorbed dose is not necessarily dependent on the diameter of the bone. Future research shouldinvestigate the generation of more complex pseudo-CT images and the dosecalculations by using these. Supported by Elekta.
    Medical Physics 06/2012; 39(6):3664. DOI:10.1118/1.4734889 · 2.64 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose: Magnetic resonance (MR) images are used increasingly in external radiotherapy target delineation because of their superior soft tissue contrast compared to computed tomography (CT) images. Nevertheless, radiotherapy treatment planning has traditionally been based on the use of CT images, due to the restrictive features of MR images such as lack of electron density information. This research aimed to measure absorbed radiation doses in material behind different bone parts, and to evaluate dose calculation errors in two pseudo-CT images; first, by assuming a single electron density value for the bones, and second, by converting the electron density values inside bones from T(1)∕T(2)∗-weighted MR image intensity values. Methods: A dedicated phantom was constructed using fresh deer bones and gelatine. The effect of different bone parts to the absorbed dose behind them was investigated with a single open field at 6 and 15 MV, and measuring clinically detectable dose deviations by an ionization chamber matrix. Dose calculation deviations in a conversion-based pseudo-CT image and in a bulk density pseudo-CT image, where the relative electron density to water for the bones was set as 1.3, were quantified by comparing the calculation results with those obtained in a standard CT image by superposition and Monte Carlo algorithms. Results: The calculations revealed that the applied bulk density pseudo-CT image causes deviations up to 2.7% (6 MV) and 2.0% (15 MV) to the dose behind the examined bones. The corresponding values in the conversion-based pseudo-CT image were 1.3% (6 MV) and 1.0% (15 MV). The examinations illustrated that the representation of the heterogeneous femoral bone (cortex denser compared to core) by using a bulk density for the whole bone causes dose deviations up to 2% both behind the bone edge and the middle part of the bone (diameter <2.5 cm), but in the opposite directions. The measured doses and the calculated ones in the standard CT image were within 0.4% (through gelatine only) and 0.9% (behind bones). Conclusions: This study indicates that the decrease in absorbed dose is not dependent on the bone diameter with all types of bones. Thus, performing dose calculation in a pseudo-CT image by assuming a single electron density value for the bones can lead to a substantial misrepresentation of the dose distribution profile. This work showed that dose calculation accuracy can be improved by using a pseudo-CT image in which the electron density values have been converted from the MR image intensity values inside bones.
    Medical Physics 01/2013; 40(1):011701. DOI:10.1118/1.4769407 · 2.64 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In radiotherapy, target tissues are defined best on MR images due to their superior soft tissue contrast. Computed tomography imaging is geometrically accurate and it is needed for dose calculation and generation of reference images for treatment localization. Co-registration errors between MR and computed tomography images can be eliminated using magnetic resonance imaging-only based treatment planning. Use of ionizing radiation can be avoided which is especially important in adaptive treatments requiring several re-scans. We commissioned magnetic resonance imaging-only based procedure for external radiotherapy, treatment planning of the prostate cancer. Geometrical issues relevant in radiotherapy, were investigated including quality assurance testing of the scanner, evaluation of the displacement of skin contour and radiosensitive rectum wall, and detection of intraprostatic fiducial gold seed markers used for treatment localization. Quantitative analysis was carried out for 30 randomly chosen patients. Systematic geometrical errors were within 2.2 mm. The gold seed markers were correctly identified for 29 out of the 30 patients. Positions of the seed midpoints were consistent within 1.3 mm in magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography. Positional error of rectal anterior wall due to susceptibility effect was minimal. Geometrical accuracy of the investigated equipment and procedure was sufficient for magnetic resonance imaging-only based radiotherapy, treatment planning of the prostate cancer including treatment virtual simulation. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 07/2013; 70(1). DOI:10.1002/mrm.24459 · 3.57 Impact Factor
Show more