The Income Elasticity of the Value per Statistical Life: Transferring Estimates between High and Low Income Populations

Journal of Benefit-Cost Analysis 01/2011; 2(1):1-1. DOI: 10.2202/2152-2812.1009
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT The income elasticity of the value per statistical life (VSL) is an important parameter for policy analysis. Mortality risk reductions often dominate the quantified benefits of environmental and other policies, and estimates of their value are frequently transferred across countries with significantly different income levels. U.S. regulatory agencies typically assume that a 1.0 percent change in real income over time will lead to a 0.4 to 0.6 percent change in the VSL. While elasticities within this range are supported by substantial research, they appear nonsensical if applied to populations with significantly smaller incomes. When transferring values between high and lower income countries, analysts often instead assume an elasticity of 1.0, but the resulting VSL estimates appear large in comparison to income. Elasticities greater than 1.0 are supported by research on the relationship between long-term economic growth and the VSL, by cross-country comparisons, and by new research that estimates the VSL by income quantile. Caution is needed when applying these higher elasticities, however, because the resulting VSLs appear smaller than expected future earnings or consumption in some cases, contrary to theory. In addition to indicating the need for more research, this comparison suggests that, in the interim, VSL estimates should be bounded below by estimates of future income or consumption.

1 Bookmark
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: We compare state-of-the-art implementation of Benefit Cost Analysis (BCA) and Cost Utility Analysis (CUA) as tools for making priorities in allocation of national public funds in the transport sector and health sector, respectively, in Sweden. While the principal distinctions between these methods are well known, less notice has been given to a number of other differences that have emerged as national and international practices have evolved over time along separate lines. We compare cost and benefit components and economic parameter values and find some surprising disparities. There are inconsistencies, both across methods and within each method. Both can be improved by learning from the other. We also find that some current practices conflict with the underlying welfare theory and/or insights from recent empirical analysis.
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Purpose The objective of this paper is to investigate the impact of the road environment (urban vs. rural) in the willingness-to-pay to reduce traffic risk. Methods The process is based on state-of-the-art econometric models (ordered probit and random effects ordered probit models), using data from a stated preference survey, with separate scenarios for urban and rural roads. The theoretical constructs of “willingness to pay to reduce a fatality” (WTPF) and “value of (statistical) life” (VOSL) are used. Results The WTPF for the rural area is found 3.6 times higher than for the urban environment. This finding is consistent with the literature and can be interpreted as a higher perception of traffic risk associated with rural trips over urban trips. When the WTPF is weighted by the traffic volume, this difference is reduced to 1.85 times higher VoSL for rural over urban trips. Conclusions The estimated values of statistical life seem somewhat high compared to other estimates around the world. However, they are consistent with similar studies in Greece. The VOT for the two cases is similar and has a reasonable magnitude, suggesting that the WTPF/VOSL differences are not due to a major discrepancy in valuation of rural vs. urban trips.
    European Transport Research Review
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Acceptance of basic surgical care as an essential element of any properly functioning health system is growing. To justify investment in surgical interventions, donors require estimates of the economic benefit of treating surgical disease. The present study aimed to establish a methodology for valuing the potential economic benefit of surgical intervention using cleft lip and palate (CLP) in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) as a model. Economic modeling of cleft lip and cleft palate (CLP) in SSA was performed with retrospective demographic and economic data from 2008. The total number of Disability-Adjusted Life-Years (DALYs) secondary to CLP in 2008 was calculated from accepted clefting incidence rates and disability weights taken from the Global Burden of Disease Project. DALYs were then converted to monetary terms ($US), using both a human capital approach and Value of a Statistical Life (VSL) approach. With the human capital approach, the potential economic benefit if all incident cases of CLP in SSA in 2008 were repaired at birth ranged from $252 million to $441 million. With VSL, the potential economic benefit of the same CLP repair would range from $5.4 billion to $9.7 billion. Cleft lip and cleft palate can have a substantial impact on the economic health of countries in the developing world. Further studies should be directed at quantifying the economic benefit of surgical interventions and quantifying their costs with an economically sound approach.
    World Journal of Surgery 03/2011; 35(6):1194-201. · 2.23 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 27, 2014