The Regional Nature of the World's Automotive Sector

Warwick Business School, University of Warwick
European Management Journal (Impact Factor: 0.8). 10/2004; 22(5):471-482. DOI: 10.1016/j.emj.2004.09.006
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT There are 29 automotive firms in the world's largest 500 firms. Yet none of these are "global" firms, defined as having at least 20 per cent of their sales in each of the three regions of the broad "triad" of the E.U., North America and Asia. Indeed 23 of the 29 auto and auto parts firms are home-region based, with an average of 60.6 per cent of their sales as intra-regional. These are representative firms across the 500, as the average intra-regional sales for all manufacturing firms is 61.8 per cent. There are a few special cases, especially Toyota and Nissan of firms being active in two regions of the triad. DaimlerChrysler and Honda are "host-region oriented". Seven cases are discussed in some detail to explore the reasons for the lack of globalization in the world automotive business.


Available from: Simon Collinson, Apr 14, 2015
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A paradox of international business is that the multinational enterprises (MNEs) – which are the agents of international business – largely operate within their home-base markets in each part of the “triad” of North America, the E.U. and Japan. Here, empirical evidence is presented across the 500 largest MNEs. It shows that even the 20 most “international” MNEs (those with the highest ratio of foreign-to-total sales) are mainly home-triad based in their activities. We conclude that the strategic management of MNEs needs to be regionally focused, not global.
    03/2003; 11(1):3-12. DOI:10.1108/1525383X200300001
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper analyzes the regional characteristics and strategies of multinational enterprises (MNEs) in the world cosmetics and toiletries industry, based on the new work by Rugman on regional strategy. We test the proposition that MNEs may asymmetrically develop their upstream and downstream firm specific advantages (FSAs). We find that the downstream activities of the MNEs in cosmetics are home region based but that upstream activities are more so. Further, the asymmetry of FSAs in the world cosmetics industry is mainly due to the atypical Asian entry strategies of North American and West European cosmetics MNEs. Two case studies confirm how variations in FSAs can affect regional strategy.
    European Management Journal 04/2006; 24(2):163-173. DOI:10.1016/j.emj.2006.03.006 · 0.80 Impact Factor
  • Source