Journal of the European Economic Association (Impact Factor: 1.36). 05/2011; 9(3):522-550. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-4774.2011.01015.x
Source: RePEc

ABSTRACT This paper studies risk attitudes using a large representative survey and a complementary experiment conducted with a representative subject pool in subjects' homes. Using a question asking people about their willingness to take risks “in general”, we find that gender, age, height, and parental background have an economically significant impact on willingness to take risks. The experiment confirms the behavioral validity of this measure, using paid lottery choices. Turning to other questions about risk attitudes in specific contexts, we find similar results on the determinants of risk attitudes, and also shed light on the deeper question of stability of risk attitudes across contexts. We conduct a horse race of the ability of different measures to explain risky behaviors such as holdings stocks, occupational choice, and smoking. The question about risk taking in general generates the best all-round predictor of risky behavior.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study explores people's risk taking behaviour after having suffered large real-world losses following a natural disaster. Using the margins of the 2011 Australian foods (Brisbane) as a natural experimental setting, we �find that homeowners who were victims of the foods and face large losses in property values are 50% more likely to opt for a risky gamble - a scratch card giving a small chance of a large gain ($500,000) - than for a sure amount of comparable value ($10). This�finding is consistent with prospect theory predictions regarding the adoption of a risk-seeking attitude after a loss.
    European Economic Review 10/2014; 71:121-131. · 1.53 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: One of the challenges that mobile services face is the high cost of data delivery over cellular networks. This problem is further aggravated with the use of multimedia type content (understood in the context of this research as video in combination with audio and possible text) that can lead to congestion and higher bills. Although higher cost might not be a problem for everyone, there are people who would not like to pay that much. This paper proposes delivering personalized content that is cost effective for the user considering the user attitude towards risk. A novel model is proposed to assess the user risk attitude by taking into account the user self-assessment, his/her age and gender. Based on this information, a personalized mechanism for delivering adaptive multimedia content can be achieved. The proposed user model was validated through a series of case studies.
    Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), 2012 IEEE; 01/2012
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: A growing body of literature has suggested that agents’ risk attitudes may not be constant and are correlated with factors such as wealth. We introduce state-dependent risk aversion into Aiyagari’s (1994) heterogenous-agent version of standard neoclassical growth model with uninsurable idiosyncratic shocks to earning. We first quantitatively show the relationships among risk aversion, saving rate, equilibrium interest rate and wealth distribution. In particular, we show that if agent’s risk aversion increases with wealth, the model predicts a larger wealth inequality, while assuming risk decreases with wealth leads to a smaller wealth inequality. We then use experimental data to estimate how risk aversion is correlated with an individual’s wealth. We found that the relationship between risk aversion and wealth is hump-shaped. That is, risk aversion first increases with an individual’s wealth and then decreases with it. Using the same model, we quantify the implication of this relationship between risk aversion and wealth on wealth inequality. The results show that the overall wealth inequality changes very little compared to the case with constant risk aversion. This is because, though the poorest agents save less, which increases wealth inequality, the richest agents also save less, which reduces the wealth inequality. Putting these two together, it leaves the overall wealth inequality implied by the model similar to that of the case of constant risk aversion.

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 20, 2014