Article

Autismus bei erwachsenen Menschen mit geistiger Behinderung

Der Nervenarzt (Impact Factor: 0.8). 11/2010; 81(11):1333-1345. DOI: 10.1007/s00115-010-3098-1

ABSTRACT Nach Angaben der WHO besteht bei 1–3% der Bevölkerung eine geistige Behinderung (GB). Bei etwa jedem 4.Menschen mit GB besteht
zusätzlich eine Autismusspektrumstörung (24,6%, Mittelwert aus 19 Studien, n=9675), wobei die Prävalenz mit dem Grad der GB
ansteigt (IQ 50–70: 9,9%, IQ<50: 31,7%). Besonders für die behandelnden Ärzte von psychisch kranken oder verhaltensauffälligen
Menschen mit GB ist es daher wichtig, die Störung zu erkennen, differenzialdiagnostisch abzuklären und therapeutische Schritte
einzuleiten.

Die Diagnose basiert – unabhängig vom IQ – auf einer vor dem 3.Lebensjahr begonnenen Beeinträchtigung in den Kernbereichen
soziale Interaktion, Kommunikation und eingeschränkten, repetitiven Interessen (frühkindlicher oder Kanner-Autismus). Auch
bei Menschen mit einer GB kann Autismus als zusätzliche, eigenständige Störung diagnostiziert werden, wobei die kommunikativen
und sozialen Fähigkeiten in Relation zum Intelligenz- und Entwicklungsniveau zu setzen sind.

Aufgrund der reduzierten Ausdrucks- und Introspektionsfähigkeit, der erhöhten Prävalenz körperlicher und psychischer Erkrankungen,
der erschwerten Anamnesebedingungen und der u.U. atypischen Symptompräsentation ist die Diagnosestellung bei erwachsenen
Menschen mit GB eine besondere Herausforderung.

Der vorliegende Artikel beschreibt die Symptomatik, das diagnostische Vorgehen, häufige Komorbiditäten und Differenzialdiagnosen
sowie therapeutische Möglichkeiten und Grenzen bei erwachsenen Menschen mit Intelligenzminderung und Autismusverdacht.

According to the World Health Organization (WHO) the estimated prevalence of intellectual disabilities (ID) is about 1–3%
and 1 out of 4 individuals with ID suffer from an additional autistic spectrum disorder (ASD) (arithmetic mean 24.6%, 19 studies,
n=9,675) whereby the prevalence increases with the severity of ID (IQ 50–70: 9.9%, IQ<50: 31.7%). Therefore, it is of particular
importance for physicians treating individuals with ID who have psychiatric disorders or behavioral problems to take ASD into
account as a differential diagnosis so that appropriate treatment can be initiated.

Irrespective of the IQ the diagnosis is based on an impairment of social interaction and communication and restricted repetitive
interests presenting before the age of 3 (infantile or Kanner autism). ASD can be diagnosed as a separate disorder in adults
with ID, however, the social and communicative abilities in respect of the cognitive and developmental level have to be considered.

Due to reduced verbal capacity, high prevalence of physical and mental disorders, difficulties in taking the past medical
history and presentation of atypical symptoms, the diagnostic assessment for autism in adults with ID is challenging.

This article describes the typical symptoms, diagnostic approach, frequent comorbidities, differential diagnoses treatment
options and their limitations for adults with ID suspected of having ASD.

SchlüsselworterAutismus-Diagnose-Geistige Behinderung-Prognose-Therapie
KeywordsAutism-Diagnosis-Mental retardation-Prognosis-Therapy

0 Bookmarks
 · 
151 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The areas of seven subregions of the corpus callosum and three subregions of the cerebellum were examined on midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging scans of 27 low-IQ autistic individuals and 17 nonautistic individuals of comparable mental age. Autistic individuals had a significantly smaller corpus callosum (most marked in the body). No significant between-group differences were found in cerebellum areas. Results demonstrate that abnormalities of the corpus callosum reported in high-functioning autistic individuals are also present in autistic individuals with mental retardation and extend previous reports showing no evidence for a selective hypoplasia of cerebellar lobules VI-VII.
    Journal of Neuropsychiatry 02/1999; 11(4):470-4. · 2.40 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Cambridge, 1993.
    01/2004;
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This paper was commissioned by the committee on the Effectiveness of Early Education in Autism of the National Research Council (NRC). It provides a review of epidemiological studies of pervasive developmental disorders (PDD) which updates a previously published article (The epidemiology of autism: a review. Psychological Medicine 1999; 29: 769-786). The design, sample characteristics of 32 surveys published between 1966 and 2001 are described. Recent surveys suggest that the rate for all forms of PDDs are around 30/10,000 but more recent surveys suggest that the estimate might be as high as 60/10,000. The rate for Asperger disorder is not well established, and a conservative figure is 2.5/10,000. Childhood disintegrative disorder is extremely rare with a pooled estimate across studies of 0.2/10,000. A detailed discussion of the possible interpretations of trends over time in prevalence rates is provided. There is evidence that changes in case definition and improved awareness explain much of the upward trend of rates in recent decades. However, available epidemiological surveys do not provide an adequate test of the hypothesis of a changing incidence of PDDs.
    Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders 09/2003; 33(4):365-82. · 3.34 Impact Factor