Chapter

Quantitative Colocalisation Imaging: Concepts, Measurements, and Pitfalls

DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-71331-9_5

ABSTRACT Many questions in cell biology and biophysics involve the quantitation of the colocalisation of proteins tagged with different
fluorophores and their interaction. However, the incomplete separation of the different colour channels due to the presence
of autofluorescence, along with cross-excitation and emission ‘bleed-through’ of one colour channel into the other, all combine
to render the interpretation of multiband images ambiguous. Traditionally often used in a qualitative manner by simply overlaying
fluorescence images (‘red plus green equals yellow’), multicolour fluorescence is increasingly moving away from static dual-colour
images towards more quantitative studies involving the investigation of dynamical three-dimensional interaction of proteins
tagged with different fluorophores in live cells. Quantifying fluorescence resonance energy transfer efficiency, fluorescence
complementation and colour merging following photoactivation or photoswitching provide related examples in which quantitative
image analysis of multicolour fluorescence is required. Despite its widespread use, reliable standards for evaluating the
degree of spectral overlap in multicolour fluorescence and calculating quantitative colocalisation estimates are missing.
In this chapter, using a number of intuitive yet practical examples, we discuss the factors that affect image quality and
study their impact on the measured degree of colocalisation. We equally compare different pixel-based and object-based descriptors
for analysing colocalisation of spectrally separate fluorescence. Finally, we discuss the use of spectral imaging and linear
unmixing to study the presence in a ‘mixed pixel’ of spectrally overlapping fluorophores and discuss how this technique can
be used to provide quantitative colocalisation information in more complex experimental scenarios in which classic dual- or
triple-colour fluorescence would produce erroneous results.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
98 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: In this study, we have examined the transfection of aqueous CdS quantum dots (QDs) in the cytoplasm of PC12 neuronal cells using polyethylenimine (PEI) as carrier. The CdS QDs were prepared using a unique aqueous synthesis method, at 5 nm in size and capped with 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane (MPS). They exhibited a quantum yield of 7.5% and a zeta potential of -25 mV. With PEI they formed complexes by electrostatic attraction. At PEI/QD number ratios of>100, the PEI-QD complexes obtained exhibited a saturated size of about 24 nm and a zeta potential of about 15 mV. Confocal microscopy showed that PEI-QD complexes of a PEI/QD number ratio of 200 were successfully internalized and uniformly distributed inside the cells, indicating that the PEI-QD complexes were able to rupture the vesicles to enter the cytoplasm without aggregation. In addition, we showed that the presence of the PEI did not reduce the photoluminescence of the QDs and only mildly reduced the mitochondrial activity of the transfected cells-with no apparent reduction at a PEI/QD ratio of <40 to about 30% reduction at a PEI/QD number ratio of 200.
    Nanotechnology 11/2008; 19(47):475101. · 3.84 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Advances in microscopy and fluorescent probes provide new insight into the nanometer-scale biochemistry governing the interactions between eukaryotic cells and pathogens. When combined with mathematical modelling, these new technologies hold the promise of qualitative, quantitative and predictive descriptions of these pathways. Using the light microscope to study the spatial and temporal relationships between pathogens, host cells and their respective biochemical machinery requires an appreciation for how fluorescent probes and imaging devices function. This review summarizes how live cell fluorescence microscopy with common instruments can provide quantitative insight into the cellular and molecular functions of hosts and pathogens.
    Cellular Microbiology 02/2009; 11(4):540-50. · 4.81 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and the Mander's overlap coefficient (MOC) are used to quantify the degree of colocalization between fluorophores. The MOC was introduced to overcome perceived problems with the PCC. The two coefficients are mathematically similar, differing in the use of either the absolute intensities (MOC) or of the deviation from the mean (PCC). A range of correlated datasets, which extend to the limits of the PCC, only evoked a limited response from the MOC. The PCC is unaffected by changes to the offset while the MOC increases when the offset is positive. Both coefficients are independent of gain. The MOC is a confusing hybrid measurement, that combines correlation with a heavily weighted form of co-occurrence, favors high intensity combinations, downplays combinations in which either or both intensities are low and ignores blank pixels. The PCC only measures correlation. A surprising finding was that the addition of a second uncorrelated population can substantially increase the measured correlation, demonstrating the importance of excluding background pixels. Overall, since the MOC is unresponsive to substantial changes in the data and is hard to interpret, it is neither an alternative to nor a useful substitute for the PCC. The MOC is not suitable for making measurements of colocalization either by correlation or co-occurrence.
    Cytometry Part A 08/2010; 77(8):733-42. · 3.71 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

View
28 Downloads
Available from
May 30, 2014