A Controlled Clinical Trial With Pirfenidone in the Treatment of Pathological Skin Scarring Caused by Burns in Pediatric Patients

University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL .
Annals of plastic surgery (Impact Factor: 1.49). 07/2012; 69(1):111; author reply 111-2. DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e31824ba4fd
Source: PubMed
Download full-text


Available from: M. Felix Freshwater, Jul 30, 2014
93 Reads
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Pathologic skin scarring reversion remains a big challenge for surgeons, as disfiguring scars have a dramatic influence on patient's quality of life. A controlled clinical trial was conducted to evaluate 8% pirfenidone (PFD) gel administered topically 3 times a day during 6 months to 33 pediatric patients with hypertrophic scars caused by burns. A total of 30 patients with hypertrophic scars with identical Vancouver Scar Scale values were treated with pressure therapy and included as controls. Improvements were evaluated by Vancouver Scar Scale and a Visual Analog Scale. Safety parameters were determined by the presence of adverse events and monitoring laboratory and hematology parameters. Patients treated with PFD during 6 months presented a continuous monthly statistically significant scar regression in comparison with the initial Vancouver measurement (P = <0.001). PFD group showed a higher improvement of all scar features as compared with control group treated with pressure therapy (P = <0.001). In the PFD group, 9 of 33 patients (27%) had their scores decreased in Vancouver classification by more than 55%, 22 patients (67%) had a 30% to 45% decrease, whereas 2 patients (6%) had a 30% decrease or less. Control group treated with pressure therapy showed a slight improvement in 16% of cases on an average. Patients did not show serious adverse effects or laboratory alterations throughout the study. Topical administration of 8% PFD gel 3 times a day is more effective and safe in the treatment of hypertrophic scars caused by burns in children, as compared with standard pressure therapy.
    Annals of plastic surgery 06/2011; 68(1):22-8. DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e31821b6d08 · 1.49 Impact Factor
  • Plastic &amp Reconstructive Surgery 01/1999; 102(7):2515-6. DOI:10.1097/00006534-199812000-00056 · 2.99 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Tattooing is increasingly common in Western society. The aim of the study was to create an overview of the surgical options when a tattoo is present in the operative site and to present an algorithm for the surgical plan.A literature-based study was conducted, using the Pubmed database. The following search terms have been used: "tattoo" in combination with "incision," "scar," and "surgery." Apart from the literature, we also used our own clinical experience with the tattoos.An overview is presented on the different options when a tattoo is at risk because of a surgical intervention. An algorithm is presented to help surgeons to choose the best option before the operation.By realizing that a tattoo can be of great value to a patient and by using surgical skills to preserve the tattoo as much as possible, it becomes possible to increase patient satisfaction in these difficult cases.
    Annals of plastic surgery 01/2010; 64(1):125-7. DOI:10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181b1429f · 1.49 Impact Factor