TCT-747 Efficacy and safety of intensified antiplatelet therapy on the basis of platelet reactivity testing in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: Systematic review and meta-analysis

University of Pécs, Heart Institute, Pécs, Hungary.
International journal of cardiology (Impact Factor: 4.04). 06/2012; 167(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.05.100
Source: PubMed


ADP-specific platelet function assays were shown to predict thrombotic events, and might be helpful to select candidates for more potent antiplatelet therapy. We aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of giving intensified antiplatelet therapy on the basis of platelet reactivity testing for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Electronic databases were searched to find prospective, randomized trials that reported the clinical impact of using an intensified antiplatelet protocol (repeated loading or elevated maintenance doses of clopidogrel, prasugrel or glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor) on the basis of ADP-specific platelet reactivity testing (VerifyNow, Multiplate, VASP or light transmission aggregometry) compared to standard-dose clopidogrel. Evaluated efficacy measures included cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction and definite/probable stent thrombosis (ST), while major bleeding events were recorded as safety endpoint.

Between 2008 and 2011, 10 clinical trials comprising 4213 randomized patients were identified. Compared to standard antiplatelet therapy, the intensified protocol was associated with a significant reduction in cardiovascular mortality, ST and myocardial infarction (p<0.01 for all). There was no difference in the rate of major bleeding events between intensified and standard groups (p=0.44). Although the observed effects regarding mortality, ST and bleeding were not heterogeneous, meta-regression analysis revealed that the net clinical benefit of the intensified treatment significantly depended on the risk of ST with standard-dose clopidogrel (p=0.023).

Intensifying antiplatelet therapy on the basis of platelet reactivity testing reduces cardiovascular mortality and ST after PCI; however, the net benefit of this approach depends on the risk of ST with standard-dose clopidogrel.

Download full-text


Available from: András Komócsi, Oct 05, 2015
1 Follower
161 Reads
  • Source
    • "Routine or platelet function testing-guided administration of higher or repeated clopidogrel loading doses (LDs) and higher maintenance doses (MDs) have failed to overcome hyporesponsiveness in a significant proportion of patients and yielded unsatisfactory long-term clinical results [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] [15]. Genetic variants of CYP2C19 and ABCB1 genes have been associated with hyporesponsiveness and cardiovascular events among patients on treatment with clopidogrel [16]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Background and objective: Additional loading doses and higher maintenance doses (MDs) have been used to overcome hyporesponsiveness of clopidogrel. We aimed to investigate whether genetic polymorphisms of two cytochromes (CYP2C19 and CYP2C9) and ABCB1 modify effect of such dose-adjustment strategy. Materials and methods: We enrolled 118 patients undergoing elective or acute percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with drug eluting stent (DES). Platelet reactivity index (PRI) was measured using the vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) index and a cut-off value of ≥ 60% was defined as hyporesponsiveness. Polymorphism of two cytochromes (CYP2C19, CYP2C9) and gene ABCB1 were determined. In patients hyporesponsive to the initial LD the dose-adjustment was performed using up to 3 additional 600 mg LDs in order to achieve PRI <60%, and both 150 mg and 75 mg MD were tested at the follow-up. Results: Patients with at least one CYP2C19*2 allele had higher baseline PRI after the initial LD (78.2 ± 13.1 vs. 65.3 ± 19.5, P=0.005). The PRI reduction with additional LD was significantly smaller in carriers of the CYP2C19*2 (25.2 ± 15.6 vs. 35.5 ± 16.8, P=0.025) and similar trend was observed with subsequent additional LDs. Both MDs were less effective in presence of CYP2C19*2. Target PRI was, however, more frequently achieved with higher MD even in presence of CYP2C19*2 (in 70.6% vs. 23.5% of hyporesponders, P=0.008). No such differences were observed for other polymorphisms. Conclusions: In patients hyporesponsive to a routine clopidogrel doses the potency of additional LD and higher MD of clopidogrel is compromised by presence of CYP2C19*2 allele. The dose-adjustment strategy is not affected by ABCB1 C3435T or CYP2C9 genotypes.
    Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) 12/2014; 50(1):19-27. DOI:10.1016/j.medici.2014.05.004 · 0.49 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "However, so far, no clear evidence indicates that a tailored strategy based on the correction of clopidogrel resistance is clinically superior to a “one-size-fits-all” approach. Two of the largest randomized clinical trials of tailored versus standard therapy (ARCTIC and GRAVITAS studies) failed to demonstrate that, in clopidogrel resistant patients, defined by specific tests for ADP receptors-dependent pathways, a high-dose clopidogrel is superior [26, 27]; on the other hand, overall data indicate that a personalized strategy based on different methods, not strictly specific for P2Y12 pathway activation, may be successful, especially in high-risk patients [28]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Von Willebrand factor (VWF) is an emerging risk factor in acute coronary syndromes. Platelet Function Analyzer (PFA-100) with Collagen/Epinephrine (CEPI) is sensitive to functional alterations of VWF and also identifies patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HPR). The objective of this study was to verify the effect of double dose (DD) of aspirin and clopidogrel on HPR detected by PFA-100 and its relation to VWF and to its regulatory metalloprotease ADAMTS-13. Between 2009 and 2011 we enrolled 116 consecutive patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI with HPR at day 5 after PCI. Patients recruited were then randomized between a standard dose (SD, n = 58) or DD of aspirin and clopidogrel (DD, n = 58), maintained for 6 months follow-up. Blood samples for PFA-100, light transmittance aggregometry, and VWF/ADAMTS-13 analysis were collected after 5, 30, and 180 days (Times 0, 1, and 2). At Times 1 and 2 we observed a significantly higher CEPI closure times (CT) in DD as compared to SD (P < 0.001). Delta of CEPI-CT (T1 - T0) was significantly related to VWF (P < 0.001) and inversely related to ADAMTS-13 (0.01). Responders had a significantly higher level of VWF at T0. Finally, in a multivariate model analysis, VWF and ADAMTS-13 in resulted significant predictors of CEPI-CT response (P = 0.02). HRP detected by PFA-100 in acute myocardial infarction is reversible by DD of aspirin and clopidogrel; the response is predicted by basal levels of VWF and ADAMTS-13. PFA-100 may be a useful tool to risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes given its sensitivity to VWF.
    The Scientific World Journal 12/2013; 2013:313492. DOI:10.1155/2013/313492 · 1.73 Impact Factor
  • Source
    • "Suboptimal inhibition of platelet function by clopidogrel in a considerable part of the patients has been demonstrated by a number of clinical studies [4,6,12,14–17]. To overcome the wide inter-individual variability in the response to clopidogrel, guided antiplatelet therapy has been suggested, which could improve clinical outcome and may result in a reduced rate of ischemic and hemorrhagic complications [12,18]. Tailored treatment based on the results of laboratory tests however is not yet adopted in routine clinical practice due to a number of important issues: questions of efficacy, cost-benefit ratios and lack of standardized laboratory test [14,16]. "
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Clinical studies suggest that 10-50% of patients are resistant to clopidogrel therapy. ADP induced platelet aggregation, a widely used test to monitor clopidogrel therapy, is affected by aspirin and is not specific for the P2Y12 receptor inhibited by clopidogrel. To develop a P2Y12-specific platelet aggregation test and to compare it with other methods used for monitoring clopidogrel therapy. Study population included 111 patients with the history of ischemic stroke being on clopidogrel monotherapy and 140 controls. The effect of clopidogrel was tested by a newly developed ADP(PGE1) aggregation test in which prostaglandin E1 treated platelets are used. Results of conventional ADP induced platelet aggregation, VerifyNow P2Y12 assay and ADP(PGE1) aggregation were compared to those obtained by flow cytometric analysis of vasodilator stimulated phosphoprotein (VASP) phosphorylation. Reference intervals for all assays were determined according to the guidelines of Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute. The P2Y12-specificity of ADP(PGE1) test was proven by comparing it with ADP aggregation in the presence of P2Y1 antagonist, adenosine 3', 5'-diphosphate. The method was not influenced by aspirin treatment. Approximately 50% of patients were clopidogrel resistant by conventional ADP aggregation and VerifyNow tests. The ADP(PGE1) method and the VASP phosphorylation assay identified 25.9% and 11.7% of patients as non-responders, respectively. ADP(PGE1) aggregation showed good correlation with VASP phosphorylation and had high diagnostic efficiency. The new ADP(PGE1) method is a reliable test for monitoring P2Y12 receptor inhibition by platelet aggregation. As a subset of patients are non-responders, monitoring clopidogrel therapy by adequate methods is essential.
    PLoS ONE 07/2013; 8(7):e69417. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0069417 · 3.23 Impact Factor
Show more