Misverstand: de behandeling van dissociatieve stoornissen moet zich richten op het verwerken van traumatische gebeurtenissen uit het verleden

Dth 12/2007; 27(4):169-170. DOI: 10.1007/BF03056869

ABSTRACT De literatuur over dissociatieve verschijnselen richt zich bijna zonder uitzondering op de relatie tussen dissociatie en traumatische
gebeurtenissen uit het verleden (Goodwin & Sachs, 1996). Als gevolg hiervan heeft een eenvoudig lineair trauma-dissociatiemodel
een soort ‘objectieve werkelijkheidswaarde’ gekregen in klinische milieus. Zo ontstond een individueel georiënteerd behandelmodel
dat sterk gericht is op het doorwerken van traumatische ervaringen uit het verleden.

12 Reads
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The purpose of this study was to: a) assess the link between sexual and/or physical abuse and dissociation in conversion disorder and chronic pelvic pain patients; and b) assess whether this effect is independent of level of general psychopathology. This report examines data from four separate samples. Fifty-two patients with chronic pelvic pain, 61 patients with non-epileptic seizures, and two samples of patients (102 and 54) with predominantly motor or sensory types of conversion disorder were studied. Using point-biserial correlations no compelling evidence for a consistent and positive association of sexual and/or physical abuse with dissociation was found. After statistically controlling for level of psychopathology using multiple regression analyses, in most of the cases the association of abuse with dissociation was no longer statistically significant. Only physical abuse predicted level of somatoform dissociation over and above level of psychopathology. In future clinical studies of dissociation in patients with conversion disorder and chronic pelvic pain more complex models may be needed with less exclusive reliance on historical antecedents such as childhood abuse and more emphasis on recent potentially traumatizing experiences or co-morbid psychiatric disorders.
    The International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine 02/2004; 34(4):305-18. DOI:10.2190/YDK2-C66W-CL6L-N5TK · 0.89 Impact Factor
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Although the presence of psychological stress factors in the evolution of conversion symptoms forms an important criterion for the DSM-IV diagnosis of conversion disorder, little is known about the nature and timing of these stress factors. Fifty-four patients with conversion disorder and 50 control patients with an affective disorder were screened for life events experienced in the year before the symptom onset. Conversion patients did not differ from control patients in the number or severity of life events, but showed a significant relation between the recent life events and the severity of conversion symptoms. Especially life events with respect to work and relationships contributed to this effect. These results remained when controlling for the previously found effects of childhood traumatization on the severity of conversion symptoms. The findings imply that conversion symptoms may be elicited by a complex of early and later negative life events and that traditional unifactorial trauma-theories of conversion disorder should be replaced by multifactorial stress models.
    Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease 09/2005; 193(8):508-14. DOI:10.1097/01.nmd.0000172472.60197.4d · 1.69 Impact Factor