Article

The impossibility of experimental elicitation of subjective probabilities

Tel Aviv University, Tell Afif, Tel Aviv, Israel
Theory and Decision (Impact Factor: 0.48). 01/1995; 38(3):313-320. DOI: 10.1007/BF01362238

ABSTRACT We show that if decision makers may have stakes in certain events then the experimental elicitation of their subjective probabilities of these events is impossible.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
48 Views
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Atwo-sector, country-wide model of production, consumption, and regulation is developed to examine,the linkages between,water use and economic activity. The model indicates that water use is influenced by economic scale, composition, national income, openness to trade, and climatic factors. The relationships described by the ,model are tested using UNESCO data on
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The theoretical literature has a rich characterization of scoring rules for eliciting the subjective beliefs that an individual has for continuous events, but under the restrictive assumption of risk neutrality. It is well known that risk aversion can dramatically affect the incentives to correctly report the true subjective probability of a binary event, even under Subjective Expected Utility. To address this one can "calibrate" inferences about true subjective probabilities from elicited subjective probabilities over binary events, recognizing the incentives that risk averse agents have to distort reports. We characterize the comparable implications of the general case of a risk averse agent when facing a popular scoring rule over continuous events, and find that these concerns do not apply with anything like the same force. For empirically plausible levels of risk aversion, one can reliably elicit most important features of the latent subjective belief distribution without undertaking calibration for risk attitudes providing one is willing to assume Subjective Expected Utility.
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Understanding risky choice requires knowledge of beliefs and preferences. A variety of methods have been proposed to elicit beliefs. Theory shows that some methods should produce biased estimates except under restrictive assumptions, while others should produce unbiased estimates with fewer restrictive assumptions. The efficacy of alternative methods, however, has not been systematically documented empirically. We use an experiment to test whether induced beliefs can be recovered using a scoring rule and prediction-based elicitation method. Pooling subject responses, we are unable to recover the induced beliefs with either method. The bias associated with the prediction method tends to be larger than the bias associated with the scoring rule method. Using individual responses, we find the performance of each method is subject- specific. For some subjects, the scoring rule works, while for others, the prediction method works. Overall, one of the two methods successfully recovered the induced beliefs for 70 percent of subjects.