The two facets of female violence: The public and the domestic domains

Bar-Ilan University
Journal of Family Violence (Impact Factor: 1.17). 11/1993; 8(4):345-359. DOI: 10.1007/BF00978098

ABSTRACT Violent behavior of women varies significantly in the public and private domains. Criminal statistics indicate a relatively low proportion of women among violent offenders in the public domain, while in the domestic and/or private domain statistics reflect almost no gender difference in violent behavior. The following paper proposes a dynamic model which draws upon psychological and sociological variables and suggests that the clue for understanding the paradoxical phenomenon lies in the relative importance the domestic domain plays in the woman''s value structure. Among the variables considered were: social learning patterns regarding violent behavior; perception of danger; and the ways in which women express their frustration and/or anger.

Download full-text


Available from: Sarah Ben-David, Jan 14, 2014
  • Source
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Studies of maladaptive behavior in women have traditionally focused on difficulties that are self-destructive in nature, such as suicidal behavior, eating disorders, and self-mutilation (e.g., Canetto & Lester, 1995; Cross, 1993; Nolen-Hoeksema, 1987). However, in the last several years, there has been a shift toward seeking to understand women’s maladjustment in its aggressive and socially harmful forms (Ayduk, Downey, Testa, Ying Yen, & Shoda, 1999). This shift has, in part, been the result of a greater awareness of the existence and prevalence of women’s harmful acts. For example, between 1988 and 1997, the rate of criminal activity rose more dramatically for female (69%) than for male (26%) adolescents, as msured by court referrals (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1999). Finally, interest in female aggressive behavior has also been encouraged by studies on close relationships that find women use strategies such as direct physical aggression (e.g., Archer & Ray, 1989; Arias, Samios, & O’Leary, 1987; Ben-David, 1993; Deal & Wampler, 1986; Plass & Gessner, 1983), verbal aggression (e.g., Billingham & Sack, 1987; deWeerth & Kalma, 1992), and the undermining of others’ social relationships (e.g., Bjorkqvist, Osterman, & Lagerspetz, 1992; Cairns & Cairns, 1994; Crick & Grotpeter, 1995) to inflict intentional harm (Ayduk et al., 1999).
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Abstract Thirty females, aged 15 to 18 years, 16 of whom had conduct disorder and 14 of whom were normal controls, completed the Iowa Gambling Task, a card game that replicates real-life decision-making.The task involved selecting cards over trials from four decks: two advantageous,and two disadvantageous.The hypotheses were that the controls would have better performance on the task, which is indicated by a higher final score, choosing more cards from
Show more