Is there an interaction between perceived direction and perceived aspect ratio in stereoscopic vision?

Attention Perception & Psychophysics (Impact Factor: 2.15). 04/2012; 62(5):910-926. DOI: 10.3758/BF03212077

ABSTRACT In monocular vision, the horizontal/vertical aspect ratio (shape) of a frontoparallel rectangle can be based on the comparison
of the perceived directions of the rectangle’s edges. In binocular vision of a typical three-dimensional scene (when occlusions
are present), this is not the case: Frontoparallel rectangles would be perceived in a distorted fashion if an observer were
to base perceived aspect ratio on the perceived directions of the rectangle’s edges. We psychophysical^ investigated stereoscopically
perceived aspect ratios of frontoparallel occluding and occluded rectangles for various distances and fixation depths. We
found that observers did not perceive the distortions that would be predicted on the basis of the above-mentioned comparison
of the perceived visual directions of the edges of the rectangle. Our results strongly suggest that the mechanism that determines
perceived aspect ratio is dis-sociated from the mechanism that determines perceived direction. The consequences of the findings
for the Kanizsa, Poggendorff, and horizontal/vertical illusions are discussed.

  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: During binocular fixation, the eyes usually point in different directions, and yet, each object is judged to lie in a single direction. It is commonly believed that a particular location in the head serves as the origin for such directional judgments. This location is known as the cyclopean eye. We argue here that observers can judge visually perceived directions from angular information alone, and do not require positional information supplied by a cyclopean eye. We show that experimental findings reported as evidence for the cyclopean concept can also be explained solely by angular information without the need for a cyclopean eye. Recent findings concerning binocular shape perception and the cyclopean illusion demonstrate that binocular perception is incompatible with vision from a single vantage point. The concept of the cyclopean eye is sometimes inappropriate and always irrelevant as far as vision is concerned.
    Vision Research 05/2002; 42(9):1157-63. DOI:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00280-2 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The influence of binocular disparate targets on the perceived visual direction of adjacent monocular targets has been termed "binocular capture". The magnitude of capture increases significantly with increasing vertical separation between monocular targets. This study sets out to elucidate the interaction between spatial frequency content, contrast polarity and vertical separation between monocular targets to establish the roles of the monocular target's positional uncertainty and the underlying position-encoding mechanism in the production of binocular capture. Relative alignment thresholds and bias were measured separately for a pair of vertically separated monocular Vernier spatial frequency ribbons and a pair of monocular Gaussian bars presented across a random dot stereogram. Ribbon pairs comprised carrier frequencies that were either matched (8 cpd or 1 cpd) or mismatched (top ribbon 1 cpd, bottom ribbon 8 cpd, and vice versa). The Gaussian bars were presented with either matched contrast (bright/bright) or opposite polarity (bright/dark) contrast. Capture magnitudes increased significantly with vertical separation for all ribbon conditions and for both contrast polarity conditions. In these conditions, capture magnitude co-varied with relative alignment threshold. The matched 1 cpd ribbons showed a significant effect of separation and relative alignment threshold on capture magnitude for low contrast stimuli but not for high contrast stimuli. The results are consistent with the hypothesis that perceived visual direction of a monocular target becomes increasingly dependent on the surround visual direction when its relative position signals are poor. Furthermore, its vulnerability to capture by the surround visual direction seems to be dependent on the underlying position encoding mechanism employed to compute relative position information of the monocular target.
    Vision research 12/2011; 51(23-24):2369-77. DOI:10.1016/j.visres.2011.09.011 · 2.38 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: The class III β-tubulin isotype (β(III)) is expressed exclusively by neurons within the normal human retina and is not present in normal retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells in situ or in the early phase of primary cultures. However, aberrant expression of class III β-tubulin has been observed in passaged RPE cells and RPE cells with dedifferentiated morphology in pathologic epiretinal membranes from idiopathic macular pucker, proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) and proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) has been implicated in dedifferentiation of RPE cells and has a critical role in the development of proliferative vitreoretinal diseases. Here, we investigated the potential effects of TGF-β on the aberrant expression of class III β-tubulin and the intracellular signaling pathway mediating these changes. TGF-β-induced aberrant expression and O-linked-β-N-acetylglucosamine (O-GlcNac) modification of class III β-tubulin in cultured RPE cells as determined using Western blotting, RT-PCR and immunocytochemistry. TGF-β also stimulated phosphorylation of ERK. TGF-β-induced aberrant expression of class III β-tubulin was significantly reduced by pretreatment with U0126, an inhibitor of ERK phosphorylation. Our findings indicate that TGF-β stimulated aberrant expression of class III β-tubulin via activation of the ERK signaling pathway. These data demonstrate that mature RPE cells have the capacity to express a neuron-associated gene in response to TGF-β stimulation and provide useful information towards understanding the pathogenesis of proliferative vitreoretinal diseases.
    Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 11/2011; 415(2):367-72. DOI:10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.10.074 · 2.28 Impact Factor


Available from
Jun 2, 2014