Article

Graduate teacher motivation for choosing a job in education

International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance (Impact Factor: 0.97). 08/2007; 7(2):123-136. DOI: 10.1007/s10775-007-9117-5

ABSTRACT This article compares individuals already in teaching and non-teaching teacher graduates, and explores the motivation to pursue a teaching job based on job motives and work values. From the response of 241 recently graduated teachers it may be concluded that teachers consider intrinsic, altruistic and interpersonal features as strong job-specific motivators. Furthermore, teachers prefer altruistic and interpersonal work values, while non-teachers are more attracted by individualistic work values such as career opportunities and executive power.
Dieser Artikel stellt unter Absolventen eines Lehramts-Studiengangs einen Vergleich zwischen einer Gruppe an, die in eine
Lehrertätigkeit einmündete, mit einer anderen Gruppe, die in eine andere als eine lehrende Tätigkeit mündeten. Aus den Antworten
von 241 Lehrern, die kürzlich ihr Studium abgeschlossen hatten, kann die Schlussfolgerung gezogen werden, dass Lehrer sich
vor allem an intrinsischen, altruistischen und interpersonellen Motivatoren orientieren. Weiterhin bevorzugen Lehrer auch
altruistische und interpersonelle Werthaltungen, während sich Nicht-Lehrer stärker angesprochen fühlen von individualistischen
Werthaltungen wie Aufstiegsmöglichkeiten und Durchsetzungsmacht/Einfluss.
En este artículo se hace una comparación entre profesores que tienen un empleo relacionado con la educación y los que no.
Explora la motivación para elegir un trabajo en la enseñanza en función de motivos laborales y del puesto de trabajo en sí.
De 241 profesores encuestados recién titulados se puede concluir que el profesorado considera los aspectos intrínsecos, altruistas
e interpersonales como motivos importantes específicos relacionados con el trabajo. Además, los profesores prefieren los valores
laborales altruistas e interpersonales, mientras que los que no ejercen como profesores se sienten más atraídos por valores
individualistas como las oportunidades de promoción en su carrera y por cargos de poder.
Cet article compare les professeurs diplômés qui exercent une activité professionnelle dans l’enseignement à ceux qui l’exercent
ailleurs. Il explore la motivation à poursuivre un métier d’enseignement sur la base des motivations pour le métier et des
valeurs au travail. Des réponses de 241 personnes récemment diplômées professeurs, on peut conclure que les enseignants considèrent
les traits de motivation intrinsèque, altruiste et interpersonnelle comme les plus spécifiques pour leur travail. De plus,
les enseignants marquent leur préférence pour les valeurs de travail altruistes et interpersonnelles, tandis que les non-enseignants
sont plus attirés par des valeurs de travail individualistes telles que les opportunités de carrière et le pouvoir de décision.

0 Bookmarks
 · 
256 Views
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This study investigated whether teaching motivations and their outcomes in Hong Kong with a teacher surplus are similar to countries with teacher shortage. Results from 132 pre-service teachers showed altruistic and intrinsic motivations were the most important teaching motivations and they correlated positively with planned teaching engagement. Unlike other studies, two types of fallback career motivation were identified, but only one correlated negatively with planned engagement. Analysis of interview data revealed that the maladaptive effects of fallback career motivation could be reduced by altruistic and intrinsic subject matter motivations. The heuristic value to examine the complete motivation profile was discussed.
    Teaching and Teacher Education 07/2014; 41:81–91. DOI:10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.009 · 1.32 Impact Factor
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: This annual review of the research and practice literature related to career counseling and development during 2007 is presented in 9 areas: professional issues, career assessment, career development, career theory and concepts, career interventions, advances in technology, personnel selection and job placement, international perspectives, and book reviews. Professional issues of a multicultural, multiethnic, and diversified workforce have become among the most frequently enumerated themes of the 2007 career development literature. The author summarizes and discusses the implications of the findings in this literature for the practice of career counseling.
    12/2008; 57(2). DOI:10.1002/j.2161-0045.2008.tb00044.x
  • Source
    [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Most principal–agent literature of nonprofit organizations has focused on the relationship between board members and managers. However, in addition to the role as an agent of the board, the manager also performs a role as principal with respect to the nonprofit employees. By using a discrete choice experiment, we identify the objectives of managers and employees in nonprofit organizations and assess the presence of agency problems in this relationship. Our sample consists of 76 headmasters, 161 teachers, and 39 administrative employees in 74 secondary nonprofit schools in Belgium. We find that the six objectives set out in the experiment play an important role for both headmasters and subordinate staff. However, the results also indicate that some of these objectives are significantly more important for the headmasters. In sum, our results suggest that agency theory and stewardship theory are not necessarily in conflict with each other but can be combined into a more general governance framework for nonprofit organizations. Consequently, we argue that incentive structures that incorporate different types of objectives can facilitate the recruitment and retention of employees in nonprofit organizations.
    Nonprofit Management and Leadership 09/2013; 24(1):63-85. DOI:10.1002/nml.21081 · 0.58 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Download
115 Downloads
Available from
May 31, 2014