Quantifying, Understanding and Managing the Carbon Cycle in the Next Decades

Climatic Change (Impact Factor: 4.62). 12/2004; 67(2):147-160. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-004-3765-y
Source: OAI

ABSTRACT The human perturbation of the carbon cycle via the release of fossil CO2 and land use change is now well documented and agreed to be the principal cause of climate change. We address three fundamental research areas that require major development if we were to provide policy relevant knowledge for managing the carbon-climate system over the next few decades. The three research areas are: (i) carbon observations and multiple constraint data assimilation; (ii) vulnerability of the carbon-climate system; and (iii) carbon sequestration and sustainable development.

1 Bookmark
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Guinea-Bissau is one of the poorest countries in the world with a large proportion of its population living in rural areas. While industry is limited, over 70% of the territory is covered by forests, which can potentially be used to attract investment through forest-based projects that promote reductions in carbon emissions and sustainable management. These can be leveraged by producing accurate maps of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) at national level and by developing cost-effective mapping methods that allow reliable future updating for management and engagement in international mechanisms such as the United Nations (UN) Collaborative Program on Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD) in developing countries.Using data from Japan's Advanced Land Observing Satellite (ALOS) Phased Array L-band Synthetic Aperture Radar (PALSAR), this study compared a semi-empirical and machine learning algorithm, with the latter based on bagging stochastic gradient boosting (BagSGB), for retrieving the AGB of woody vegetation thereby supporting estimation of national carbon stocks. AGB was estimated by using measurements of tree size collected from112 forest plots during two field campaigns (2007 and 2008) as input to published allometric equations.The BagSGB outperformed the semi-empirical algorithm, resulting in a coefficient of correlation (R) between observed and cross-validation predicted forest AGB values of 0.95 and in a root mean square error (RMSE) of 26.62 Mg ha− 1. Furthermore, the BagSGB model produced also a measure of forest AGB prediction variability (coefficient of variation) on a pixel-by-pixel basis, with values ranging from 7 to 250% (mean = 42%). An estimate of total forest AGB carbon stock of 96.93 Mt C was obtained in this study for Guinea-Bissau, with a mean forest AGB value of 65.17 Mg ha− 1. Although the mean error associated with this forest AGB map is still undesirably high, several issues were addressed. The heterogeneity of forest structural types, presence of palm trees, and dimension and type of field plots were identified as potential source of uncertainty that must be tackled in future studies. This study represents a step forward regarding the information currently available for Guinea-Bissau.
    Remote Sensing of Environment 06/2012; 121:426–442. · 4.77 Impact Factor
  • Source
    01/2009; CIFOR., ISBN: 978-979-1412-75
  • [Show abstract] [Hide abstract]
    ABSTRACT: Forested wetlands are recognized as long-term terrestrial C sinks, so they are very important in global C accounting. Daxing’anling is the main area of Chinese forested wetlands, however, effects of harvesting on ecosystem C storage for boreal forested wetlands are still poorly understood. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term effects of selective harvest on ecosystem C storage and C sequestration for Larix gmelinii–Carex schmidtii forested wetlands in Daxing’anling, northeast China, by measuring and comparing changes in its total ecosystem C storage (biomass, litter, and soil C pools) and annual C sequestration under four harvest treatments (0.0% – uncut, 25% – low, 35% – moderate and 50% – high of total volume) after 5 years, so as to provide references for managing wetland resources. We found that: (1) the vegetation C storage of harvested plots decreased significantly by 15.5–38.6% of that 99.61 t C ha−1 in the uncut stand and showed a decreasing trend with increasing harvest intensity; (2) low intensity harvest increased the soil C storage by 19.4%, however, both moderate- and high-intensity harvest caused significant reductions (30.1–48.5%) relative to 174.93 t C ha−1 in the uncut stand; (3) low intensity harvest led to a mild increase in the total ecosystem C storage while moderate- and high-intensity harvest resulted in significant reductions (33.2–41.6%) compared with the uncut stand (274.54 t C ha−1); (4) significantly greater total NPP (69.1–83.2%) and annual C sequestration (52.0–78.7%) were in the low- and moderate-intensity harvest stands compared to the high intensity harvest and uncut stands (8.28 t ha−1 yr−1, 5.08 t C ha−1 yr−1 and 6.48 t ha−1 yr−1, 3.52 t C ha−1 yr−1). Finally, it appears that low intensity harvest may not only be capable of sustaining the ecosystem C sink for this forested wetland type, but restore its C sequestration capacity more efficiently.
    Forest Ecology and Management 04/2013; 293:140–148. · 2.67 Impact Factor

Full-text (2 Sources)

Available from
May 22, 2014